Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Jennifer R. Wolgemuth , Jennifer E. Cross , Tara Opsal , Tanya Kaanta , Soria Colomer , Zeynep Erdil-Moody , Ellyn M Dickmann
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of South Florida, USA, Colorado State University, USA, Park University, USA, University of Wisconsin – Whitewater, USA
ANO 2015
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Qualitative Research
ISSN 1468-7941
E-ISSN 1741-3109
EDITORA Sage Publications Ltd
DOI 10.1177/1468794114524222
CITAÇÕES 15
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 c79f0372ec1562dd7ca52e69397516d3

Resumo

We used a multiple-case study to investigate participants' experiences in interviews from six qualitative studies that differed in interview orientations, designs, methods, participants, and topics. Roulston's (2010a, 2010b) interview orientation heuristic guided our 'paradigm-driven' analysis of participants' experiences. We found no differences in participants' articulation of benefits and risks by interview orientation. Participants' experiences differed based on the opportunity to reflect on their interview experiences, the sensitivity of the topic explored, and the number of interviews conducted. We discuss the implications of our findings for 'paradigm-driven' qualitative research and suggest ethical questions qualitative interview researchers can ask to maximize the benefits of their interviews.

Ferramentas