Criteria for quality in qualitative research and use of freedom of information requests in the social sciences
Dados Bibliográficos
| AUTOR(ES) | |
|---|---|
| AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | University of Winnipeg, Canada, Carleton University |
| ANO | 2017 |
| TIPO | Artigo |
| PERIÓDICO | Qualitative Research |
| ISSN | 1468-7941 |
| E-ISSN | 1741-3109 |
| DOI | 10.1177/1468794116679726 |
| CITAÇÕES | 4 |
| ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
| MD5 |
dcf930bce252177abea32ee5c03f5dd9
|
Resumo
Access to information (ATI) and freedom of information (FOI) requests are an under-used means of producing data in the social sciences, especially across Canada and the United States. We use literature on criteria for quality in qualitative inquiry to enhance ongoing debates and developments in ATI/FOI research, and to extend literature on quality in qualitative inquiry. We do this by building on Tracy's (2010) article on criteria for quality in qualitative inquiry, which advances meaningful terms of reference for qualitative researchers to use in improving the quality of their work; and illustrating these criteria using examples of ATI/FOI research from our own work and from others' in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom. We argue that, when systematically designed and conducted, ATI/FOI research can prove extraordinary in all eight of Tracy's criteria.