Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparing Food Label Experiments Using Samples from Web Panels versus Mall Intercepts

Bibliographic Data

ID2407481
AuthorsLinchiat Chang (LinChiat Chang Consulting, LLC, San Francisco, CA, USA, corresponding author), Chung-Tung Jordan Lin (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA), Chung‐tung Jordan Lin (United States Food and Drug Administration)
Year2015
Volume27
Issue2
Pages182-198
Publication date2015-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCAM (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-8513 • E-ISSN: 1552-3969
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1525822x14548395
OpenAlexW2097959060
LanguageEN
References cited19

To regulate health messages on food labels, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) traditionally relied on mall intercepts to collect consumer data. In recent years, web surveys have presented a viable alternative for presenting visual stimuli with more control and efficiency in data collection. However, there is a paucity of empirical data that compares mall intercept versus web panel samples to inform the relative merits and weaknesses of each sample source and their corresponding impact on study outcomes. We analyzed an FDA experiment deployed concurrently on a sample of consumers intercepted at shopping malls and a sample of consumers recruited by a web panel. Despite sample differences in demographics, topic knowledge, and time spent on survey, results from the core experiment were the same, that is, both samples yielded the same conclusions about the effects of the food label statements on consumer perceptions and intentions

Advertising · Business · Data collection · Demographics · Environmental health · Food and drug administration · Sample (material) · Shopping mall · Statistics · Web survey · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Marketing · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Smoking Behavior and Cessation

  • Conjoint Analysis in Marketing

    Open Access•Paul E Green, V Srinivasan•Journal of Marketing•1990

  • Students as Experimental Participants

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Cindy D Kam•Cambridge Handbook of Experimental…•2011

  • Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk

    Open Access•Gabriele Paolacci, Joan Chandler et al.•Judgment and Decision Making•2010

  • Amazon's Mechanical Turk

    Open Access•Michael D Buhrmester, Michael Buhrmester et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2011

  • A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience

    Open Access•Daniel Kahneman, Alan B Krueger et al.•Science•2004

  • Self-Reported Smoking in Online Surveys

    J Douglass Klein, Randall K Thomas et al.•Medical Care•2007

  • Should We Trust Web-Based Studies? A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions About Internet Questionnaires

    Samuel D Gosling, Simine Vazire et al.•American Psychologist•2004

  • National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet

    Linchiat Chang, Jon A Krosnick•Public Opinion Quarterly•2009

  • Comparing Oral Interviewing with Self-Administered Computerized QuestionnairesAn Experiment

    Liu Chang, Jon A Krosnick•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  • Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-Probability Samples

    David S Yeager, Jon A Krosnick et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • College sophomores in the laboratory

    David O Sears•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • Survey Research

    Jon A Krosnick•Annual Review of Psychology•1999

  • Consumer Learning

    Stephen J Hoch, Young-Won Ha•Journal of Consumer Research•1986

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae