Methodologies and Epistemologies of the South
Folktales, Flesh Memory, and Transcultural Decolonial Duoethnography
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 24143147 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Esther O Ohito (0000-0002-7827-7945, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, autor correspondente), Lin Wu (0000-0002-6359-4593, Western Oregon University) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-01-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Journal of Qualitative Methods (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1609-4069 • E-ISSN: 1609-4069 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/16094069261478479 |
| OpenAlex | W7211891718 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 23 |
This article advances folktales as methodological tools for critical transcultural qualitative inquiry. We argue that mobilizing folktales as methodological pathways and content in transcultural qualitative research disrupts extractive, decontextualized Western research practices by foregrounding Indigenous, embodied, and storied onto-epistemologies. Using decolonial duoethnography, we place our autobiographical narratives in dialogue with the Luo folktale “Simbi Nyaima” (The Village That Sank) and the Chinese folktale “三打白骨精” (The Monkey King Beats the White Bone Demon Three Times) to show how engaging storywork sharpens the methodological imagination by recasting data analysis as a relational and ethical encounter rather than a purely procedural activity and as an embodied, affective, and dialogic practice of knowledge-making. We demonstrate that folktales can function as far more than cultural expressions that transmit knowledge; they can also operate as narrative and performative practices through which meaning is made, lived, and remembered, allowing for preserving memory and enacting research ethics grounded in communal responsibility, human–land reciprocity, and relational accountability. As such, folktales can be instrumental in actively challenging colonial hierarchies of knowing that privilege text over orality, and observation over participation, thereby fostering epistemic and cognitive justice. We propose three interlocking methodological insights as core contributions of folktale-based inquiry: thinking with rather than about the other, embracing relationality over productivity or outcome, and deepening transcultural connections and feelings. We contend that when coupled with decolonial duoethnography, folktales reposition qualitative research within the methodological traditions of the South, thereby expanding what counts as knowledge and who is validated as a knowledge producer. Ultimately, utilizing folktales as methodological utensils within a decolonial duoethnographic framework enables qualitative researchers to envision futures not only as representational but as storied, embodied, and relationally enacted, narrated through flesh memories across multiple languages, embodied ethics, and participatory, nonextractive research design.
Dialogic · Ethnography · Foregrounding · Hybridity · Meaning (existential) · Narrative · Objectification · Performative utterance · Privilege (computing) · Qualitative research · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Qualitative Research Methods and Applications · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Epistemic Injustice
The Darker Nations
Thinking through decolonizing the hopelessly hegemonic curriculum of gender and sexuality in the present moment
Continuing the Journey to the West
Asia as Method
Empires of knowledge
Asia–Latin America as Method
From colonial port to socialist metropolis
大话西游之悟空 [A posthumanist account of becoming
Hear Our Languages, Hear Our Voices
Black Like Me”
Shifting Positionalities
Democracy, Empires, and the Chinese Diasporas
Reframing Metanarratives on Africa and the Caribbean Through Decolonial Pedagogy
Epistemic Disobedience and the Decolonial Option
Outing Duoethnography as a Queer Methodology
Decolonizing Methodologies
Decolonizing Methodologies in Qualitative Research
Reciprocity in Indigenous Educational Research
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |