An Algorithmically Woven Community
Disclosing Mental Illness and Connecting with Similar Others on an Algorithm-Mediated Platform in China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2414696 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jinping Wang (0000-0001-8164-8025, University of Florida, corresponding author), Jiayu Gina Qu (0000-0001-8031-1842, Chinese University of Hong Kong), Jindong Leo-Liu (0000-0002-5456-0148, Chinese University of Hong Kong) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Media + Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2056-3051 • E-ISSN: 2056-3051 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20563051231205596 |
| OpenAlex | W4387708762 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 50 |
Nowadays, algorithms are extensively used on social platforms for content recommendations and user connections. In this study, through semi-structured interviews with 22 China-based users of RED (i.e., an algorithm-mediated platform similar to TikTok), we investigate how users who have experienced mental illnesses (depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder) understand RED algorithms and how these algorithms shape their self-disclosure, imagined audience, and community building. Specifically, both the norms of self-disclosure and content recipients are governed by algorithms, while users with limited agency form various folk theories to navigate the process. Moreover, based on accurate content recommendations, the algorithms of RED enable users who have experienced mental illnesses to connect with similar others across the platform. By proposing the concept of an 'algorithmically woven community,' we conceptualize and visualize a novel mechanism of how an algorithm works akin to a responsive authority to weave a loosely knit, decentralized, and boundless network
Algorithm · Mental health · Mental illness · Psychiatry · Sociology · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Mental Health via Writing · Psychology
The lonely algorithm problem
“Am I Truly Depressed or Just Pretending To Be?” A Discourse-Analytical Approach to Online Illness Narratives by People Living With Depression on Zhihu
Domesticating algorithms through data reflectivity and user reflexivity
What Drives Patient Preferences for AI Chatbots Over Doctors? A Survey Study Using the O-S-O-R Model
“Modern-Day Instruments of Torture for Women”
Taking back and giving back on TikTok
Learning From Strangers
Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity
A Disclosure Decision Model
Self-disclosure and social media
Disclosure and concealment of stigmatized identities
Fostering empowerment in online support groups
How People Form Folk Theories of Social Media Feeds and What it Means for How We Study Self-Presentation
Mental Health Discourse on reddit
First I "like" it, then I hide it
The future of mental health care
The stress-buffering effect of self-disclosure on Facebook
Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks
The algorithmic imaginary
The Cultural Geography Reader
Social Comparison
Characterizing Depression Issues on Sina Weibo
Affective coding
Hashtagging depression on Instagram
Norms of online expressions of emotion
Hazing as a Process of Boundary Maintenance in an Online Community
Technical Features of Asynchronous and Synchronous Community Platforms and their Effects on Community Cohesion
Reply distribution in online discussions
AI agency vs. human agency
To Reveal or Not to Reveal
The Social Dimension of Blogging about Health
Decoding algorithms
Fostering intimacy on TikTok
I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately
The Great Interview
Why's Everyone on TikTok Now? The Algorithmized Self and the Future of Self-Making on Social Media
Imagined Affordance
An invitation to use craigslist ads to recruit respondents from stigmatized groups for qualitative interviews
Qualitative Research and Translation Dilemmas
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |