Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) M. Daniels , Justin Willis , Lutfi Khalil , Gareth Disler , April (Ye) Zhou
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
ANO 2017
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO SAGE Open
ISSN 2158-2440
E-ISSN 2158-2440
EDITORA SAGE Publications Inc.
DOI 10.1177/2158244017739339
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 b9e861ed6ea44b581a2f248bb46c05cf

Resumo

Compromise is largely based on being able to come to a common perspective while sacrificing marginal values that would otherwise deny a reconciliation of disparate ideas. Due to the absence of an established intergroup compromise measure in the extant political or social psychology literature, we attempted to develop and psychometrically examine such a scale within the political psychology domain. Across two studies, we found construct and predictive validity for three scales that predict individuals' propensity to compromise in a political context. In Study 2, we found evidence of model invariance between Democrats and Republicans, suggesting that our measures of compromise, political animus, and distrust are assessing these constructs equally for both major parties.

Ferramentas