Secondary Use of Health Data in Canada and the European Union
Expectations, Frictions and the Politics of Scale
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24213626 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joseph Donia (0000-0001-5834-8198, Department of Medical Biotechnology & Translational Medicine University of Milan Milan Italy), Luisa Marelli (0000-0002-3960-0033, Department of Medical Biotechnology & Translational Medicine University of Milan Milan Italy) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | e70270-e70270 |
| Publication date | 2026-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociology of Health & Illness (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0141-9889 • E-ISSN: 1467-9566 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9566.70270 |
| PMID | 42811618 |
| OpenAlex | W7214979244 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 55 |
In this article, we trace expectations associated with efforts to promote secondary use of health data in Canada and the European Union. In Canada, we focus on initiatives enabling cross‐jurisdictional data access in a highly devolved federal system with parallel commitments to Indigenous data sovereignty. In the EU, we focus on the European Health Data Space, a new regulatory regime intended to facilitate access to health data for clinical care, research, policymaking and innovation across 27 member states. Drawing on a comparative analysis of policy documents and semi‐structured interviews across nine EU member states and four Canadian provinces and one territory, we find that despite institutional differences, secondary use in both jurisdictions is characterised by strikingly similar promissory vocabularies. We argue that these expectations are fundamentally ones of scale: They seek to render health data interoperable, comparable and usable to different ends. At the same time, we document shared frictions: between sovereignty and integration; between access and control; and between private assets and public goods. We understand these as spaces where competing valuations of health data are negotiated. We suggest that secondary use logics are progressively reorienting health systems, with implications for public value, equity and political collectives.
Canada · data interoperability · European Health Data Space · European union · health data governance · Indigenous data sovereignty · Public value · secondary use of health data · Electronic Health Records Systems · Healthcare Systems and Practices · Research Data Management Practices · Health Policy
Selective visibility in datafied states
Markets in the Making
Challenging the “deficit model” of innovation
Health Systems Governance in Europe
Differential Data Protection Regimes in Data-Driven Research
The European health data space
Implementation of the European health data space
Structures, Habitus, Practices
Data Paradoxes
American oncology and the discourse on hope
Data saves lives’
Governance-by-standards in the field of stem cells
Bridging silos or adding friction? The data work behind re-identification across interoperable data infrastructures
Constructing the data economy
The Political Economy of Hope
Techno-economic Assumptions
The politics of scaling
Promising pessimism
Science friction
Fit for purpose? The GDPR and the governance of European digital health
Anticipation
E-Infrastructures and the divergent assetization of public health data
Friction and Promise in Data Labor
The social imaginaries of data activism
The politics of constructing health data spaces
Choreographing for public value in digital health
Data journeys
Institutions, infrastructures, and data friction - Reforming secondary use of health data in Finland
The Ethnography of Infrastructure
Theory Construction in Qualitative Research
Futures in Action
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |