A complex arc of engagement
Shifting psychological trajectories of international solidarity during sustained geopolitical conflict
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24213779 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vivian P Ta (0000-0002-2373-335X, Department of Psychology, College of Health, Community, and Policy University of Texas at San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA), A Burcu Bayram (0000-0003-0538-9791, Department of Political Science, Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences University of Arkansas Fayetteville Arkansas USA) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Publication date | 2026-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-895X • E-ISSN: 1467-9221 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/pops.70200 |
| OpenAlex | W7215087615 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 49 |
How do international audiences psychologically engage with prolonged geopolitical conflicts on social media? Drawing on 1.2+ million English‐language tweets posted during the first 10 months of the Russia–Ukraine war, this study examines temporal shifts in engagement, emotion, existential concern, cognition, and psychological distance reflected through language. Results identified a clear psychological arc across the conflict. Discourse in the earliest phase was characterized by strong active engagement, heightened negative emotion, increased focus on death, conflict, and morality, and greater cognitive effort aimed at making sense of unfolding events. As the war persisted, these indicators declined and were replaced by shorter posts, fewer retweets, reduced existential focus, and simpler emotional and cognitive expression, consistent with attention fatigue and chronic crisis adaptation. Unexpectedly, psychological distance decreased over time, suggesting that users expressed themselves in more personal, spontaneous ways as the conflict became an enduring part of the digital environment. This challenges the view that declining engagement signals general disengagement and instead reveals a shift toward more grounded, personally meaningful forms of involvement. Findings illuminate the dynamic psychological processes through which publics respond to sustained conflict and highlight implications for political communication, humanitarian outreach, and crisis messaging strategies across the lifespan of international crises.
attention fatigue · cognitive effort · crisis adaptation · Emotional expression · international solidarity · psychological distance · Russian invasion of Ukraine · social media engagement · Twitter · Media Studies and Communication · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Social Media and Politics
Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication as an Integrative Model
Emotion drives attention
Why people use social media
Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use
Collective Emotions and Social Resilience in the Digital Traces After a Terrorist Attack
How Emotion Shapes Behavior
Linguistic Markers of Psychological Change Surrounding September 11, 2001
When Small Words Foretell Academic Success
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Twitter chirps for Syrian people
Social Signal Processing in Affective Virtual Reality
“And you don't like, don't like the way I talk”
Authentic First Impressions Relate to Interpersonal, Social, and Entrepreneurial Success
Mapping Linguistic Shifts During Psychological Coping With the Covid-19 Pandemic
The Limited Capacity Model of Mediated Message Processing
Early Linguistic Markers of Trauma-Specific Processing Predict Post-trauma Adjustment
Sustaining attention to simple tasks
Forensic conflict studies
Media dependency, selective exposure and trust during war
The like economy
The cost of dehumanization
Verbal behavior and the future of social science
Two Faces of Media Attention
Natural Language Analysis and the Psychology of Verbal Behavior
Media witnessing and the ‘crowd-sourced video revolution
Unveiling the online dynamics influencing the success and virality of TikTok social movements
Does Social Media Influence Conflict? Evidence from the 2012 Gaza Conflict
How Sudden Censorship Can Increase Access to Information
Introduction to the Special Issue of 'TikTok and Social Movements
Pronoun Use Reflects Standings in Social Hierarchies
The Psychological Meaning of Words
The Politics of Twitter
| Highly cited | No |
|---|