When discovery is mistaken for applicability
A warning on practice implications drawn from purely qualitative research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24216423 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Timothy Lintner (0000-0002-1448-4064, Masaryk University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-10 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Social Research Methodology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1364-5579 • E-ISSN: 1464-5300 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13645579.2026.2736850 |
| OpenAlex | W7215071183 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
Practice recommendations are action-guiding claims directing practitioners or policymakers toward one course of action rather than another. Such claims require evidentiary warrants that typical qualitative designs, on their own, do not supply: a justified link from observations to a broader population, a credible comparison between alternative courses of action, and an explicit account of uncertainty. An audit of empirical articles published in 2025 across four qualitative journals – Qualitative Health Research, Qualitative Research in Psychology, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, and Qualitative Sociology – finds that a substantial and consistent proportion present practice implications derived solely from qualitative materials. The article situates this pattern within structural pressures encouraging researchers to overstate actionable conclusions, and concludes by offering constructive guidance for aligning qualitative conclusions with the warrants a given design can provide.
Evidence-based practice · generalizability · practice implications · Qualitative research · study design limitations · Educational Research and Methods · Qualitative Research Methods and Applications · Social Science and Policy Research
| Highly cited | No |
|---|