Developing educational research through a Penal-Lectical assemblage
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24216604 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan Glazzard (0000-0002-6144-0013, University of Hull), Scott Thomas (0009-0003-3100-6720, Independent Researcher , ,) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-26 |
| Publication date | 2026-09-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Qualitative Research Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1443-9883 • E-ISSN: 1448-0980 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/qrj-06-2026-0293 |
| OpenAlex | W7214196729 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 66 |
Purpose This paper explores the methodological dimensions of a prisoner–university academic co-author partnership, advancing co-production as a critical mode of knowledge generation within, against and beyond the carceral environment. Situating the collaboration within post-structural and posthuman scholarship, the paper challenges humanist assumptions about agency, authorship and expertise, instead emphasising relationality, affect and entanglement in the co-production of academic knowledge (Deleuze and Guattari, 1987; Braidotti, 2013) within the context of educational research. Drawing on post-structural and posthuman theory, we introduce the Penal-Lectical Assemblage to represent our interaction with human and non-human entities in the co-production of educational research. In addition, we introduce a methodological framework that could be adopted by academics who are interested in researching and co-authoring with prisoners. The paper outlines the challenges that we encountered, and the tools within the assemblage that we interacted with, to co-produce educational research. Design/methodology/approach The paper applies posthuman theory to co-production between an academic and a prisoner. Findings We analyse the methodological process that we adopted and develop the concept of the Penal-Lectical Assemblage. Research limitations/implications We propose a framework which is designed to support researchers who wish to undertake co-production with prisoners. Practical implications The framework that we propose will support researchers to work in a relational way when undertaking co-production work. Social implications The proposed methodology addresses the concept of epistemic injustice (Fricker, 2007) by proposing a methodology which is underpinned by relationality and the democratic principles of academic co-production. Originality/value To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to apply poststructuralist and posthuman concepts to the field of co-production between academics and prisoners. Second, the application of these concepts to co-produced educational research is vastly under-developed. Third, the paper introduces the Penal-Lectical Assemblage, an original methodological framework which represents our approach to the co-production of educational research. Finally, the paper presents a novel framework for co-production which researchers could utilise in other fields.
Affect · educational research methodology · entanglement · epistemic injustice · knowledge co-production · non-human entities · Posthumanism · Poststructuralism · Relationality · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Posthumanist Ethics and Activism · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Research Ethics for Human Geography
When the ‘Subject’ and the ‘Researcher’ Speak Together
Material Feminisms
Meeting the Universe Halfway
Epistemic Contribution as a Central Human Capability
Rethinking community-engaged pedagogy through posthumanist theory
Pedagogies of mattering
Fugitivity and Abolition in Educational Research and Practice
Thinking brainstorming as otherwise in collaborative writing
The Prisoner SocietyPower, Adaptation and Social Life in an English Prison
Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods
The Minor Gesture
Public Participation in Health and Social Care
Lost in limbo? Navigating (im)mobilities and practices of appropriation of non-deportable refugees in the Mediterranean area
Rhizomatic review
Ethical and practical considerations for including marginalised groups in quantitative survey research
Beverley’s Story
Towards socially just pedagogies
Diffracting Diffraction
For ethnography
Writing with research partners ‘from the field’
Decolonizing Ethnography
Doing new materialist data analysis
Yanama budyari gumada
Meeting the Universe Halfway
Philosophical Posthumanism
Opening Up the Black Box of Knowledge Production in International Development
The More-Than-Human Life of Capitalism
Social geography
Parables for the Virtual
Issues of validity in openly ideological research
Co-becoming Bawaka
Disease Incarnate
Situated Knowledges
An Autoethnography of Fat and Weight Loss
Another Life is Possible
The Empirical and the New Empiricisms
Top Ten+ List
Improvising Bags Choreographies
Becoming Through Contiguity and Lines of Flight
The Evidence of Experience
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |