Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Co-creation in research, policy engagement and advocacy

Lessons and limits from two decades of practice at the African Population and Health Research Center

Bibliographic Data

ID24219146
AuthorsEmmanuel Otukpa (0000-0002-9370-3500, International programs, African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC) Campus), Abdhalah K Ziraba (International programs, African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC) Campus), Luchuo Engelbert Bain (0000-0002-6006-2698, International programs, African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC) Campus)
EditorsMarie A Brault (0000-0002-7152-785X, NYU Grossman School of Medicine: New York University School of Medicine)
Year2026
Volume6
Issue9
Pagese0007405
Publication date2026-09-30
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375
PublisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1371/journal.pgph.0007405
PMID42814754
OpenAlexW7214917356
LanguageEN
References cited47

Co-creation is widely advocated in global health research and inconsistently practiced. This paper offers a reflective, practice-based synthesis of two decades of co-created research, policy engagement and advocacy at the African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC).We define co-creation through four dimensions; shared agenda setting, joint knowledge production, power sharing, and community leadership and ownership. We distinguish it from consultation, stakeholder engagement and partnership, and assess each dimension on a graded scale. To this we add a second axis: the reach of co-creation across the research-to-policy-to-advocacy interface, and the condition of the transitions between its segments. Six cases spanning evidence generation, policy processes, capacity strengthening and rights-based advocacy are assessed against both axes. Three findings emerge. Co-creation in this institution’s practice is substantive where knowledge is produced and weak where authority is held. Agendas were substantively shared in four of six cases and financial resources in none. It fails at the transitions between research, policy engagement and advocacy rather than within them, at moments that were neither designed nor evaluated nor recorded. And the domains of co-creation differ systematically in the dimensions they can realize, with community leadership substantive only in rights-based advocacy. We draw practice guidance on governance, funding, community roles, transitions and assessment, and state what a single-institution insider synthesis cannot establish.

Capacity building · Co-Creation · community leadership · community ownership · consultation · Partnership · Power sharing · research funding · research governance · Stakeholder engagement · Community Health and Development · Health Policy Implementation Science · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development

  • Participatory design and "democratizing innovation"

    Open Access•Erling Björgvinsson, Pelle Ehn et al.•Proceedings of the 11th Biennial…•2010

  • The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, Caitlin M Reardon et al.•Implementation Science•2022

  • Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions

    Open Access•Ray Pawson, Trisha Greenhalgh et al.•Journal of Health Services…•2005

  • Community-based Participatory Research

    Barbara A Israel, Amy Israel et al.•Education for Health•2001

  • Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health – a perspective on definitions and distinctions

    Open Access•Carmen Vargas, Jill Whelan et al.•Public Health Research & Practice•2022

  • The dark side of coproduction

    Open Access•Kathryn Oliver, Anita Kothari et al.•Health Research Policy and Systems•2019

  • The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care

    Open Access•Angela M Filipe, Alicia Renedo et al.•PLOS Biology•2017

  • A Definition of Systems Thinking

    Open Access•Ross D Arnold, Ross Arnold et al.•Procedia Computer Science•2015

  • Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research

    Open Access•Justin Jagosh, Ann C Macaulay et al.•Milbank Quarterly•2012

  • Unpacking 'Participation'

    A Cornwall•Community Development Journal•2008

  • Epistemic injustice in academic global health

    Open Access•Himani Bhakuni, Seye Abimbola•The Lancet Global Health•2021

  • The application of systems thinking in health

    Open Access•David H Peters•Health Research Policy and Systems•2014

  • Will global health survive its decolonisation?

    Open Access•Seye Abimbola, Madhukar Pai•The Lancet•2020

  • The foreign gaze

    Open Access•Seye Abimbola•BMJ Global Health•2019

  • The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research

    Margaret Cargo, Shawna L Mercer•Annual Review of Public Health•2008

  • Lost in the shadows

    Open Access•Oli Williams, Sophie Sarre et al.•Health Research Policy and Systems•2020

  • Cocreated regional research agenda for evidence-informed policy and advocacy to improve adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights in sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Meggie Mwoka, Adegboyega Isaac Ajayi et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • Adolescent sexual and reproductive health research in sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Adegboyega Isaac Ajayi, Emmanuel Otukpa et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • Stakeholder Engagement, Knowledge Problems and Ethical Challenges

    Open Access•J Robert Mitchell, Janet Mitchell et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2022

  • Dialectic

    Roy Bhaskar•Dialectic•2008

  • Funders

    Open Access•Esmita Charani, Seye Abimbola et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2022

  • Enriching the evidence base of co-creation research in public health with methodological principles of critical realism

    Open Access•Katrina Messiha, Teatske M Altenburg et al.•Critical Public Health•2024

  • Is realist evaluation keeping its promise? A review of published empirical studies in the field of health systems research

    Open Access•Bruno Marchal, Van Belle et al.•Evaluation•2012

  • What works to promote research-policy engagement

    Open Access•Kathryn Oliver, A Hopkins et al.•Evidence & Policy•2022

  • What is co-production? Conceptualising and understanding co-production of knowledge and policy across different theoretical perspectives

    Open Access•Justyna Bandola-Gill, Megan Arthur et al.•Evidence & Policy•2022

  • WHO has been reformed

    Open Access•Ngozi Erondu, Ngozi A Erondu et al.•Global Social Policy•2020

  • Participatory action research

    Franziska Baum, Christiana Macdougall et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2006

  • Community-Based Participatory Research Contributions to Intervention Research

    Nina Wallerstein, B Duran•American Journal of Public Health•2010

  • A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

    Sherry R Arnstein•Journal of the American Institute…•1969

  • What is participatory research

    Open Access•A Cornwall, Rachel Jewkes•Social Science & Medicine•1995

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae