Pave the Way to Diversion
Increased Salience of Foreign Policy at the Times of Economic Hardships
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24225082 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Burak Kazim Yilmaz (0000-0001-6507-5562, Emory University), Efe Tokdemir (0000-0002-9579-1292, Bilkent University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-11 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00220027261495479 |
| OpenAlex | W7221477230 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 51 |
Most research on the diversionary use of force focuses on timing of conflict initiation and target selection, often treating the public as passive observers ready to take the bait. This article challenges this assumption by examining how leaders strategically elevate foreign policy issues in public discourse before resorting to the use of force. We argue that economic downturns lead to anticipatory rhetorical agenda-setting, through which leaders increase the salience of foreign policy in shaping the conditions under which military actions become feasible. Using a large language model, we measure foreign policy salience in 29,286 US presidential addresses and remarks between 1945 and 2019. Combining these data with monthly inflation and US military interventions, we examine whether patterns in presidential rhetoric are consistent with a rhetorical pathway linking economic distress to the use of force. The results are consistent with our theoretical expectation. Higher inflation is associated with increased foreign policy salience in presidential speeches and heightened salience is, in turn, associated with a greater likelihood of military intervention, while inflation itself exhibits no robust direct relationship with the use of force. Our findings align with the expectation that diversionary dynamics may unfold as a mediated process in which leaders place greater rhetorical emphasis on foreign policy issues prior to the use of force. By highlighting the role of anticipatory agenda-setting, this study offers a nuanced perspective on diversionary conflict and highlights the importance of presidential rhetoric as a key component of foreign policy outcome.
economic hardship · Inflation · military intervention · presidential rhetoric · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Political Conflict and Governance
ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks
Mediation
Partisanship, Macroeconomic Policy, and U.S. Uses of Force, 1949-1994
The Logic of Political Survival
Large language models as a substitute for human experts in annotating political text
Distract and Divert
The Validity of Sentiment Analysis
Three Gaps in Computational Text Analysis Methods for Social Sciences
Contentious Issues as Opportunities for Diversionary Behavior
Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992
Domestic diversion
Domestic diversion and strategic behavior by minority groups
The Dynamics of Diversion
When Killers Become Victims
Diversionary cheap talk
Diversity and Diversion
Mapping (A)Ideology
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
The Contingency of the Mass Media's Political Agenda Setting Power
Can Strategic Interaction Divert Diversionary Behavior? A Model of U.S. Conflict Propensity
The Politics of Threat Perception and the Use of Force
Assuming the Costs of War
Preying on the Misfortune of Others
Territorial Diversion
Strategic Conflict Avoidance and the Diversionary Use of Force
The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media
How to train your stochastic parrot
The Myth of the Diversionary Use of Force by American Presidents
Positioning Political Texts with Large Language Models by Asking and Averaging
Introducing the Military Intervention Project
Domestic-Level Diversionary Theory of War
Democratic Diversions
Domestic Political Vulnerability and International Disputes
Rivalry and Diversionary Uses of Force
Bones of Contention
Regime Type, Strategic Interaction, and the Diversionary Use of Force
Does the Diversionary Use of Force Threaten the Democratic Peace? Assessing the Effect of Economic Growth on Interstate Conflict, 1921?2001
Democracy and Diversionary Military Intervention
Diverting with Benevolent Military Force
Foreign Targets and Diversionary Conflict
Diversionary Foreign Policy in Democratic Systems
Does Public Opinion Affect Political Speech
Domestic Structures and the Diversionary Use of Force
Presidential Influence Over the Systemic Agenda
Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations
The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Agenda Setting
Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes
| Highly cited | No |
|---|