Sport-for-development in a nation-building state
Reframing collaborative governance in the Singaporean context
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24230288 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sophia Harith (0000-0002-9591-5822, LUNEX), Wai Cheong Eugene Chew (0000-0001-9872-6296, Singapore University of Social Science), Annick Willems (0000-0003-3753-2919, Ghent University), Mathieu Marlier (0000-0001-5351-9824, LUNEX) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Publication date | 2026-09-17 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Culture Sport Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-0981 • E-ISSN: 1743-0445 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17430437.2026.2729368 |
| OpenAlex | W7213510175 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 53 |
This article critically examines the sport-for-development landscape within the distinctive sociopolitical context of Singapore, a centralised, urbanised city-state. Existing SFD literature has predominantly centred Global North perspectives, often emphasising participatory governance, individual empowerment and resistance to neoliberal logics. In contrast, this study investigates SportCares, a state-led SFD network agency, to explore how alternative governance perspectives shape participation and confer legitimacy. A total of 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with various stakeholders, senior leadership, staff members, coaches, funders, collaborative partners, and cause champions. Building on Mintzberg’s (Citation2006) typology of development approaches, our findings highlight synergies between different development logics, illustrating how sport participation is framed as a civic responsibility closely tied to national cohesion and collective wellbeing. Collaboration is seen as coordinated and strategically designed, facilitated through integrated data systems and policy feedback loops. These dynamics are embedded within the broader national agenda, Vision 2030, which positions sport as a lifelong pathway for citizen development. The article contributes to SFD scholarship by offering a Southeast Asian case and highlights an alternative governance model that is ideologically cohesive, culturally embedded and sustained by state-defined priorities.
civic responsibility · Collaborative governance · development logic · integrated data systems · Legitimacy · Nation-building · National Unity · policy feedback · Saudi Vision 2030 · Singapore · Southeast asia · sport for development · sports participation · Physical Education and Sports Studies · Sport and Mega-Event Impacts · Youth Development and Social Support
Sport serving development and peace
Developing rigor in qualitative research
Thematic analysis
Managing Legitimacy
Sport for Development
Sport for Development
Listening to the language of the context
‘Like, what even is a podcast?’ Approaching sport-for-development youth participatory action research through digital methodologies
The Sports-Based Holistic Development Model
Capacity building through cross-sector partnerships
Re-Thinking Monitoring, Evaluating, and Learning
Bridge over Troubled Water
A walk down the path of benevolence
Sport for decolonization
Sports is Politics”
From Development of Sport to Development through Sport
Shackling the Lion
Localizing Global Sport for Development
Power, Politics and “Sport for Development and Peace”
An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Mundane dynamics
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Everything Is Perfect, and We Have No Problems
Developing leaders? developing countries
Indigenous Participation in Australian Sport
Ethnographic reflections of the role of Global North volunteers in sport-for-development
| Highly cited | No |
|---|