Mundane dynamics
Understanding collaborative governance approaches to ‘big’ problems through studying ‘small’ practices
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6113178 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Yvonne La Grouw (0000-0002-8404-5251, Faculty of Law, Economics and Governance, Utrecht University School of Governance, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, autor de correspondencia), Oemar Van Der Woerd (0000-0002-1160-8164, Erasmus University Rotterdam), E Lianne Visser (0000-0003-0590-7237, Institute of Public Administration, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands), Wieke Blijleven (0000-0003-0973-3035, The Netherlands Institute for Social Research: SCP, Den Haag, Netherlands) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 39 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 412-435 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Public Policy and Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0952-0767 • E-ISSN: 1749-4192 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/09520767241244981 |
| OpenAlex | W4394813514 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 13 |
| Referencias citadas | 68 |
Collaborative approaches to governance, policymaking, and administration are believed to provide means of adequately handling wicked problems. Simultaneously, many scholars have acknowledged the difficulty of collaboration in practice. In this article, we argue that understanding the ‘small’ practices of collaborative governance and actor-positioning processes illuminates why collaborative governance is such a challenging response to wicked problems. Instead of focussing on ‘big’ collaborative approaches to ‘big’ wicked problems, zooming in on mundane dynamics demonstrates the continuous work that governing and positioning processes require, exposing the provisional nature of elements that have been argued to be vital, such as mutual trust, reciprocity, long-term commitment, authority, or autonomy. Lastly, the mundane uncovers the importance of the material, spatial, and temporal organisation of actor-positioning processes and the potential of language to inhibit or enable collaborative governance. The article ends with a reflection on how analyses of mundane dynamics may help scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and citizens to understand their own processes of engagements in collaborative endeavours and possibly temper expectations
Autonomy · Collaborative governance · Corporate governance · Economics · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Knowledge management · Management · Political science · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Management and Organizational Studies · Public Policy and Administration Research · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Street-level partnership
Addressing global health equity through Global Collaborative Evidence Networks
Vision making and values in urban regeneration
How is the collaborative process developed at the grassroots? Evidence from a party-led urban regeneration project in China
Tackling wicked problems through street-level diplomacy
A small-scale city caught between two opposing local development approaches
Advancing a healthy and sustainable food environment at a railway station
The Ethnography of Caring Networks
Building understanding of digital vulnerability
I Know I Am Not Supposed to, but I Just Want Them to Feel Cozy
Public Encounters
Governance without we. Wicked problems and collaborative governance
Embeddedness governs
Practice Theory as a Package of Theory, Method and Vocabulary
Network Governance and the Differentiated Polity
Key Concepts in Governance
Making Social Science Matter
Relational public administration
Collaborative innovation in the public sector
Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory
Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice
The New Public Governance? 1
Implementing collaborative governance
The Covid-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems
Managing (through) a network of collaborations
Interpretation and Method
All you need is … a network
Place, power and leadership
Intelligent modes of imperfect governance
What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program
Wicked and less wicked problems
Policy-making ‘front’ and ‘back’ stage
Toward a Critical Theory of Collaborative Governance
Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects
Metagoverning Collaborative Innovation in Governance Networks
Dealing With Conflicting Values in Policy Experiments
Governance Capabilities for Dealing Wisely With Wicked Problems
Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector
Working Toward Network Governance
Toward a Sociology of the Network Society
Enacting Resilience
Designing and Implementing Cross‐Sector Collaborations
How can network leaders promote public value through soft metagovernance
Public administration and politics meet turbulence
Regional network‐building for complexity
Public Policy Networks and ‘Wicked Problems’
Public Encounters
Organizational Ethnography
Governing the gap
A Framework for Assessing Power in Collaborative Governance Processes
Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings
Discretion of the Future
Knowing” the Rules
Using a design approach to create collaborative governance
An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Combining Structure, Governance, and Context
Modes of Network Governance
Working with layers
Tackling Grand Challenges Pragmatically
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
The practice of policy making
Wicked Problems
The Ethnography of Infrastructure
Theory Construction in Qualitative Research
Reflexivity as Non-Linearity
Regional assemblage and the spatial reorganisation of health and care
Care in place
| Obras citantes distintas | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 6,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 13 |