Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

AI politics and regulation in the European Parliament

Ideological divides and policy convergence amid generative AI’s ascent

Bibliographic Data

ID24230421
AuthorsÉmilie Proulx (0009-0005-8671-1018, Northeastern University), Steve Jacob (0000-0001-8301-2151, Université Laval), Arnaud Beaulé (0009-0000-4086-9841, Université Laval), Shannon Dinan (0000-0002-2714-6865, Université Laval), Yannick Dufresne (0000-0002-6211-2193, Université Laval)
Year2026
Publication date2026-10-09
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Union Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1465-1165 • E-ISSN: 1741-2757
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/14651165261494187
OpenAlexW7221169405
LanguageEN
References cited52

This study examines how European parliamentarians frame artificial intelligence in plenary speech. It also assesses how these frames map onto partisan divisions. Analyzing 666 interventions in the European Parliament (2014–2024), it shows that frames of artificial intelligence follow traditional ideological cleavages, with right-leaning parliamentarians deploying techno-optimistic frames that foreground economic innovation while left-leaning parliamentarians frame the technology through concerns about social risks and employment impacts. Thematic context also shapes framing. When interventions address economic competitiveness, optimistic frames increase significantly across the political spectrum. The findings reveal a cross-partisan consensus in favor of regulating artificial intelligence, regardless of the frames deployed. This suggests that political contestation centers not on the principle of regulatory intervention, but on its modalities and objectives. Emerging technologies are absorbed into existing ideological frameworks while generating zones of strategic convergence when economic and normative considerations align.

AI regulation · economic competitiveness · employment effects · European Parliament · generative AI · partisan divisions · policy convergence · political ideology · technological optimism · Artificial Intelligence · Digitalization, Law, and Regulation · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · European Union Policy and Governance

  • The Brussels Effect

    Anu Bradford•Brussels Effect•2020

  • The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning

    Open Access•Frank Fischer, John Forester•Argumentative Turn in Policy…•1993

  • Regulating Europe

    Giandomenico Majone•Regulating Europe•2002

  • Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice

    Maarten A Hajer•Argumentative Turn in Policy…•1993

  • Reframing Policy Discourse

    Open Access•Martin Rein, Donald A Schon et al.•Argumentative Turn in Policy…•1993

  • Reframing Public Policy

    Frank Fischer•Reframing public policy•2003

  • Competing ambitions regarding the global governance of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Sabine Mokry, Julia Gurol•Global Policy•2024

  • Techno-optimism

    Open Access•John Danaher•Philosophy & Technology•2022

  • Framing Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Kerem Öge, Manuel Quintin•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2026

  • Going Digital … But What For? Parties' Ideological Positions and Divides on Platform Societies in Western Europe

    Open Access•Marco Guglielmo•Government and Opposition•2024

  • Defining artificial intelligence as a policy problem

    Open Access•Nicole Lemke, Philipp Trein et al.•European Policy Analysis•2024

  • AI governance in the spotlight

    Open Access•Sophie Morosoli, Katharina Kieslich et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2025

  • An open window into politics

    Open Access•Camille Tremblay-Antoine, Steve Jacob et al.•European Union Politics•2024

  • The European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)

    Martin Steven•Journal of Legislative Studies•2025

  • Techno-optimism and policy-pessimism in the public sector big data debate

    Open Access•Simon Vydra, Bram Klievink•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Euroscepticism and anti-establishment parties in Europe

    Open Access•Aleks Szczerbiak, Paul Taggart•Journal of European Integration•2024

  • Approaches to policy framing

    Open Access•Jennifer Dodge, Tamara Metze•Policy Sciences•2024

  • Radicalisation and discursive accommodation

    Open Access•Natasha Wunsch, Marie‐eve Bélanger•West European Politics•2023

  • Narrative dynamics in European Commission AI policy—Sensemaking, agency construction, and anchoring

    Open Access•Frans af Malmborg•Review of Policy Research•2022

  • The Battle for Influence

    Open Access•Maja Kluger Rasmussen•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2015

  • Party Politics and Radical Right Populism in the European Parliament

    Open Access•Johanna Kantola, Cherry Miller•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2021

  • Where Have All the ‘Exiters’ Gone? Contextualising the Concept of Hard Euroscepticism

    Open Access•Vratislav Havlík, Vít Hloušek•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2025

  • Policy positioning in the European Parliament

    Open Access•Gail Mcelroy, Kenneth Benoit•European Union Politics•2012

  • Narratives and expert information in agenda‐setting

    Open Access•Daniel S Schiff, Kaylyn Jackson Schiff•Policy Studies Journal•2023

  • Narratives of digital sovereignty in German political discourse

    Open Access•Daniel Lambach, Kai Oppermann•Governance•2022

  • Who Can Assert Ownership Over Automation? Workplace Technological Change, Populist and Ethno-nationalist Rhetoric, and Candidate Support

    Open Access•Sophie Borwein, B Bonikowski et al.•Political Behavior•2024

  • Democracy by algorithm? Public attitudes towards AI in parliamentary decision-making in the UK and Japan

    Open Access•Steven David Pickering, Steve Pickering et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2025

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) in parliaments – preliminary analysis of the Eduskunta experiment

    Fotios Fitsilis•Journal of Legislative Studies•2021

  • Why parties take up digitization in their manifestos

    Pascal D König, Georg Wenzelburger•Journal of European Public Policy•2019

  • Digital sovereignty - Rhetoric and reality

    Gerda Falkner, Sebastian Heidebrecht et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2024

  • Sending Signals or Building Bridges? Digital Sovereignty in EU Communicative and Co‐Ordinative Discourse

    Open Access•Georg Wenzelburger, Pascal D König•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2025

  • Becoming Mainstream? The Emergence of Digital Policies in German Regional Party Politics

    Markus B Siewert, Pascal D König•German Politics•2021

  • Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study

    John R Petrocik•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Framing

    Open Access•Robert M Entman•Journal of Communication•1993

  • Talking AI into Being

    Open Access•Jascha Bareis, Christian Katzenbach•Science Technology & Human Values•2022

  • Playing to the Gallery

    Open Access•Moritz Osnabrügge, Sara B Hobolt et al.•American Political Science Review•2021

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae