Countering Disinformation as Community Resilience
Testing a Local-Level Assessment Framework
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24236988 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christer Pursiainen (0000-0001-5611-1701, Department of Technology and Safety (ITS), The Arctic University of Norway (UiT), Tromsø, Norway), Bjarte Rød (Department of Technology and Safety (ITS), The Arctic University of Norway (UiT), Tromsø, Norway) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-18 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Alternatives Global Local Political (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0304-3754 • E-ISSN: 2163-3150 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/03043754261491113 |
| OpenAlex | W7222897350 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 33 |
Disinformation has become a systemic challenge to democratic governance, eroding trust, weakening social cohesion, and complicating the work of public institutions. This article reframes the issue as a question of community resilience and examines how such resilience can be assessed at the local level. Building on resilience theory and indicator-based methodology, it develops a maturity-model framework across four domains: policy, governance, and regulation; education and public awareness; technology; and media, communication, and information. The framework is explored in a pilot/diagnostic study involving two related Norwegian local-governance respondent settings: elected councilors in one anonymized municipality and administrative respondents from a broader municipal sample. Across both settings, the results indicate a broadly similar pattern: communication-related capacities are more developed than educational, participatory, and technologically advanced ones, while resilience remains uneven and only partly institutionalized overall. Conceptually, the study links disinformation research to community-resilience theory; methodologically, the instrument should be understood as a governance-oriented diagnostic framework for assessing and comparing the maturity of local countermeasures.
Community resilience · countermeasures · Democratic governance · Disinformation · Local governance · Local government · maturity model · public awareness · resilience assessment framework · resilience indicators · social cohesion · technology capacity · Trust · Disaster Management and Resilience · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Public Relations and Crisis Communication
The relationship between community type and community resilience
State of the research in community resilience
Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research
Beyond boundaries
Risk Communication and Community Resilience
Defining “Fake News”
Developing a Conceptual Framework for Investigating Communication Supporting Community Resilience
Protecting Democracy from Disinformation
Resilience to natural hazards
Information disorder, fake news and the future of democracy
A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters
Digital propaganda, counterpublics and the disruption of the public sphere
Research Approaches for Understanding, Enhancing, and Monitoring Community Resilience
Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness
When Would a State Crack Down on Fake News? Explaining Variation in the Governance of Fake News in Asia-Pacific
Assessing the risks of ‘infodemics’ in response to Covid-19 epidemics
Truth, Deliberative Democracy, and the Virtues of Accuracy
Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy
Civic Literacy and Disinformation in Democracies
The Centrality of Communication and Media in Fostering Community Resilience
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry
Social Capital and Community Resilience
Educative Interventions to Combat Misinformation
Post-Truth, the Future of Democracy and the Public Sphere
Measuring Capacities for Community Resilience
| Highly cited | No |
|---|