Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Not in Your Backyard! Organizational Structure, Partisanship, and the Mobilization of Nonbeneficiary Constituents against 'Fracking' in Illinois, 2013-2014

Bibliographic Data

ID2423751
AuthorsFedor A Dokshin (0000-0002-8841-4755, University of Toronto, corresponding author), Amanda Buday (0000-0003-4141-6646, Fort Hays State University)
Year2018
Volume4
Pages237802311878347
Publication date2018-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2378-0231 • E-ISSN: 2378-0231
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/2378023118783476
OpenAlexW2810356254
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited52

In the interest of enlarging their constituencies, social movements often broaden mobilization efforts beyond the directly aggrieved, beneficiary populations. The authors examine this process through an analysis of a movement against unconventional oil and gas development (UOGD or 'fracking') in Illinois. Using data on more than 37,000 public comments submitted during a regulatory review of fracking, the authors examine the composition of the antifracking movement's constituency. Individuals residing outside the targeted development region submitted the vast majority of the comments opposing UOGD. Analyses reveal that these participants tend to be Democratic partisans who were affiliated with one or more large environmental and progressive organizations. The study offers new insight into how environmental and progressive issue campaigns are organized in the contemporary U.S. context. The authors highlight how partisan discursive opportunities combine with recent organizational innovations in the social movement sector to enable nascent single-issue campaigns to tap into the mobilization potential of motivated partisans

Beneficiary · Context (archaeology · Democracy · Geography · Mobilization · Organizational structure · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Resource mobilization · Social mobilization · Social movement · Sociology · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Law · Public Administration · Risk Perception and Management

  • Reaping Rewards, or Missing out? How Neoliberal Governance and State Growth Machines Condition the Impacts of Oil and Gas Development on Local Well-Being

    Open Access•Adam Mayer, Shawn Olson Hazboun et al.•Sociological Inquiry•2022

  • The public speaks

    Open Access•Fedor A Dokshin•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • Partisanship and proximity predict opposition to fracking in Colorado

    Open Access•Daniel Raimi, Alan Krupnick et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • Who Speaks for the Place? Cultural Dynamics of Conflicts Over Hazardous Industrial Development

    Open Access•E Kojola•Sociological Forum•2020

  • Nimbys and partisans

    Fedor A Dokshin•Environmental Politics•2020

  • Boosting Your Enemies to Garner the Sympathy of Friends

    Open Access•Edward T Walker, Ion Bogdan Vasi•Social Problems•2024

  • How Local Perceptions Contribute to Urban Environmental Activism

    Juanita Vivas Bastidas, Maria Akchurin et al.•Sociological Quarterly•2024

  • The origins of the civil rights movement

    Aldon D Morris•The origins of the civil rights…•1984

  • Insurgent identities

    Roger V Gould•Insurgent identities•1995

  • Power and Powerlessness

    John Gaventa•Power and Powerlessness•1982

  • The social movement society

    David S Meyer, Sidney G Tarrow•The social movement society•1998

  • Partisans and Partners

    Josh Pacewicz•Partisans and Partners•2016

  • Fracking the Neighborhood

    Jessica Smartt Gullion•Fracking the Neighborhood -…•2015

  • The MoveOn Effect

    David Karpf•The MoveOn effect•2012

  • Party in the Street

    Open Access•M T Heaney, F Rojas•Party in the Street•2015

  • Durably reducing transphobia

    Open Access•David E Broockman, David Broockman et al.•Science•2016

  • Landowner attitudes toward natural gas and wind farm development in northern Pennsylvania

    Open Access•Jeffrey B Jacquet, Jeffrey Jacquet•Energy Policy•2012

  • How geographic distance and political ideology interact to influence public perception of unconventional oil/natural gas development

    Open Access•Christopher E Clarke, Dylan Bugden et al.•Energy Policy•2016

  • Bystanders, Public Opinion, and the Media

    William A Gamson•Blackwell Companion to Social…•2007

  • Politics, proximity and the pipeline

    Open Access•Timothy B Gravelle, Erick Lachapelle•Energy Policy•2015

  • Bowling alone

    Open Access•Robert D Putnam•Proceedings of the 2000 ACM…•2000

  • Diminished Democracy

    Theda Skocpol•Diminished Democracy•2004

  • A Social Psychology of Protest

    Open Access•Jacquelien Van Stekelenburg, Bert Klandermans•A Social Psychology of Protest•2023

  • Austerity and Protest

    Maurizio Giugni, Marco Giugni et al.•Austerity and Protest•2016

  • How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010-2012

    Open Access•A Mazur•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • How Organizations Develop Activists

    Hahrie Han•How organizations develop activists•2014

  • Grassroots for Hire

    Open Access•Edward T Walker•Grassroots for Hire•2014

  • Understanding the Nimby and Lulu Phenomena

    Open Access•Carissa Schively•Journal of Planning Literature•2007

  • The Politics of Resentment

    Katherine J Cramer•Politics of Resentment•2015

  • Energy Abundance or Environmental Worries? Analyzing Public Support for Fracking in the U nited S tates

    Open Access•Charles Davis, Jonathan M Fisk•Review of Policy Research•2014

  • Nimbys and Lulus

    Open Access•William R Freudenburg, Susan K Pastor•Journal of Social Issues•1992

  • Nimbyism vs. environmentalism in attitudes toward energy development

    Kristy E H Michaud, Kristy Michaud et al.•Environmental Politics•2008

  • To Act or Not to Act

    Rachel A Wright, Hilary Boudet et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2012

  • Movement Framing and Discursive Opportunity Structures

    Open Access•Holly J Mccammon, Courtney Sanders Muse et al.•American Sociological Review•2007

  • Partisans and Partners

    Josh Pacewicz•Partisans and Partners•2016

  • Recruitment and Political Participation

    Open Access•Paul R Abramson, William Claggett•Political Research Quarterly•2001

  • Brokerage, Miscibility, and the Spread of Contention

    Ion Bogdan Vasi, Ion Vasi•Mobilization An International…•2011

  • Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies

    Open Access•Ted Brader, Joshua A Tucker et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2013

  • Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American Electorate

    Geoffrey C Layman, Thomas M Carsey•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • A Comparison of Conventional and Internet Political Mobilization

    Open Access•Brian S Krueger•American Politics Research•2006

  • Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation

    David A Snow, E Burke Rochford et al.•American Sociological Review•1986

  • Potentials, Networks, Motivations, and Barriers

    Bert Klandermans, Dirk Oegema•American Sociological Review•1987

  • "No Fracking Way!" Documentary Film, Discursive Opportunity, and Local Opposition against Hydraulic Fracturing in the United States, 2010 to 2013

    Open Access•Ion Bogdan Vasi, Edward T Walker et al.•American Sociological Review•2015

  • History Repeats Itself, but How? City Character, Urban Tradition, and the Accomplishment of Place

    Harvey Molotch, William Freudenburg et al.•American Sociological Review•2000

  • Not This One

    Open Access•Zeynep Tufekci•American Behavioral Scientist•2013

  • Whose Backyard and What's at Issue? Spatial and Ideological Dynamics of Local Opposition to Fracking in New York State, 2010 to 2013

    Open Access•Fedor A Dokshin•American Sociological Review•2016

  • From local conflict to national issue

    Christopher Rootes•Environmental Politics•2013

  • The effect of industry activities on public support for 'fracking

    Hilary Boudet, Dylan Bugden et al.•Environmental Politics•2016

  • Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups

    Open Access•P D Allison•Sociological Methods & Research•1999

  • Socioeconomic System of the Oil Boom and Rural Community Development in Western North Dakota

    Open Access•Felix N Fernando, Felix Fernando et al.•Rural Sociology•2016

  • Twitter and Tear Gas

    Open Access•Silvio Waisbord•Social Forces•2018

  • Why Do Liberals Drink Lattes

    D Dellaposta, Yongren Shi et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2015

  • Replacing Members with Managers? Mutualism among Membership and Nonmembership Advocacy Organizations in the United States

    Edward T Walker, John D Mccarthy et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2011

  • Partisans without Constraint

    Delia Baldassarri, Andrew Gelman•American Journal of Sociology•2008

  • Resource Mobilization and Social Movements

    John D Mccarthy, Mayer N Zald•American Journal of Sociology•1977

Unique citing works7
Citations per year1,17
Citation span2020 - 2024 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae