Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Whose Backyard and What's at Issue? Spatial and Ideological Dynamics of Local Opposition to Fracking in New York State, 2010 to 2013

Bibliographic Data

ID4522121
AuthorsFedor A Dokshin (0000-0002-8841-4755, Cornell University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume81
Issue5
Pages921-948
Publication date2016-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Sociological Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-1224 • E-ISSN: 1939-8271
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0003122416663929
OpenAlexW2508882072
LanguageEN
Citations received60
References cited64

What drives local decisions to prohibit industrial land uses? This study examines the passage of municipal ordinances prohibiting gas development using hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") in New York State. I argue that local action against fracking depended on multiple conceptions of the shale gas industry. Matching these alternative conceptions with prevailing spatial models of public response to industrial land uses-"not in my backyard," "not in anyone's backyard," and "please in my backyard"-improves our understanding of where local contention might emerge and how it contributes to policy change. Results from event history and logistic regression analyses show, first, that communities lying above favorable areas of the shale did not pass anti-fracking laws because opposition to fracking was counteracted by significant local support for development. Fracking bans passed primarily in a geographic sweet spot on the periphery of targeted regions, where little or no compelling economic interest in development existed. Second, as fracking became the subject of a highly politicized national debate, local opposition increasingly reflected mobilization by political liberals. This trend is reflected in the increasing rate of ordinance adoption among Democratic-leaning communities outside the geographic sweet spot

Democracy · Hydraulic fracturing · Ideology · Oil shale · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Shale Gas · Sociology · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Engineering · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Law · Risk Perception and Management

  • Ground truth

    Open Access•Sarah Praskievicz•Progress in Environmental Geography•2022

  • “We Are Seneca Lake”

    Open Access•Mollie K Murphy•Frontiers in Communication•2020

  • Strange Frame Fellows

    Open Access•Richard Paquin Morel•Teachers College Record The Voice…•2021

  • Assessing, monitoring, and addressing boomtown impacts in the US

    Julia H Haggerty, Kristin K Smith et al.•Impact Assessment and Project…•2018

  • U.S. shale energy production and impacts on house values

    Open Access•J Dunn, Siew Hoon Lim•The Extractive Industries and…•2025

  • Public risk perceptions of shale gas development

    Open Access•Huimin Tan, Gabrielle Wong-Parodi et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • The Home Rule Advantage

    Open Access•Amanda Buday•Social Currents•2017

  • Key Topics in environmental sociology, 1990–2014

    J Bohr, Riley E Dunlap•Environmental Sociology•2017

  • A decade of Marcellus Shale

    Open Access•Jeffrey Jacquet, Anne N Junod et al.•The Extractive Industries and…•2018

  • Unconventionally contentious

    Open Access•Jasper Finkeldey•The Extractive Industries and…•2018

  • The public speaks

    Open Access•Fedor A Dokshin•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • Partisanship and proximity predict opposition to fracking in Colorado

    Open Access•Daniel Raimi, Alan Krupnick et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • Defusing a carbon bomb

    Open Access•Kjell Kühne, James Van Alstine et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  • Blocking the sun? Social movements, industries, and the adoption of solar energy in the United States

    Open Access•Ion Bogdan Vasi, Don Grant•Energy Research & Social Science•2023

  • The challenge of community acceptance of small nuclear reactors

    Open Access•Seth Tuler, Thomas Webler•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  • Citizen perceptions of fracking-related earthquakes

    Open Access•Liesel Ashley Ritchie, M A Long et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Just environmental governance for shale gas? Transitioning towards sustainable local regulation of fracking in Spain

    Open Access•Evelyn Hull, Darrick Evensen•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • For the love of sun and wind? Proximity to renewable energy facilities and support for renewable power across time and space in the United States

    Open Access•Adam Mayer, Shawn Hazboun et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Risk Society and Anti-Politics in the Fracking Debate

    Open Access•Frances Drake•Social Sciences•2018

  • Fracking Evictions

    Open Access•Carl Gershenson, Olivia Jin et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2023

  • Dashed dreams

    Open Access•Colin Jerolmack•Sociological Forum•2024

  • No Tyson in Tongie!”

    Open Access•Walter J Nicholls, Cecilia Menjívar et al.•Sociological Forum•2020

  • Who Speaks for the Place? Cultural Dynamics of Conflicts Over Hazardous Industrial Development

    Open Access•E Kojola•Sociological Forum•2020

  • Collective Neoliberalism and Market Fundamentalism

    Open Access•A Malin, Adam Mayer et al.•Sociological Forum•2022

  • Reconceptualizing rapid energy resource development and its impacts

    Open Access•K A Schafft, Kathryn J Brasier et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2018

  • Climate change beliefs and support for development

    Open Access•J Tom Mueller, A R Tickamyer•Journal of Rural Studies•2020

  • No Fracking Way” vs. “Drill Baby Drill”

    Open Access•Madeline Gottlieb, Ernst Bertone Oehninger et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2018

  • Birth and Death(?) of the Anti-Fracking Movement

    Open Access•A Mazur•Society•2018

  • The Ecology of Environmental Association

    Jonathan S Coley, Quan D Mai•Sociological Focus•2022

  • The impact of stakeholder engagement on local policy decision making

    Open Access•Le Anh Nguyen Long, Megan Foster et al.•Policy Sciences•2019

  • A threat-centered theory of policy entrepreneurship

    Open Access•Gwen Arnold•Policy Sciences•2021

  • Nimbys and partisans

    Fedor A Dokshin•Environmental Politics•2020

  • To drill or not to drill

    Open Access•Jacques E C Hymans, Fumiya Uchikoshi•Environmental Politics•2022

  • Proposed Pipelines and Environmental Justice

    Open Access•Johann Strube, B C Thiede et al.•Rural Sociology•2021

  • Rural Landowners, Energy Leasing, and Patterns of Risk and Inequality in the Shale Gas Industry

    Open Access•Dylan Bugden, Richard C Stedman et al.•Rural Sociology•2018

  • Local power

    Open Access•Melvin Lerner•Review of Policy Research•2021

  • Clearing the cobwebs

    Open Access•Thomas Rotolo, Michael Lengefeld•Social Science & Medicine•2020

  • Organizational Scarring, Legal Consciousness, and the Diffusion of Local Government Litigation Against Opioid Manufacturers

    Open Access•Amanda Sharkey, K M Young et al.•American Sociological Review•2025

  • The Precarious Project and the Wasted Opportunity

    Open Access•Richard E Ocejo•Urban Affairs Review•2021

  • Policy Expansion in Local Government Environmental Policy Making

    Open Access•Gwen Arnold, Le Anh Nguyen Long•Public Administration Review•2018

  • Fracking Bad Guys

    Open Access•Chad Zanocco, Geoboo Song et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2018

  • Does Entrepreneurship Work? Understanding What Policy Entrepreneurs Do and Whether It Matters

    Open Access•Gwen Arnold•Policy Studies Journal•2021

  • Identity-based subgroups and information exchange in adversarial policy networks

    Open Access•Jeongyoon Lee, Kun Huang•Journal of Public Policy•2023

  • Exploring the Place of Animals and Human-Animal Relationships in Hydraulic Fracturing Discourse

    Open Access•Cameron T Whitley•Social Sciences•2019

  • Contentious immigration politics in a multijurisdictional field

    Open Access•Walter J Nicholls, Marieke De Wilde•Political Geography•2023

  • Raising the stakes

    Open Access•Daniel N Kluttz•Socio-Economic Review•2019

  • The effect of policy narratives on policy elite versus public preferences for hydraulic fracturing regulation

    Open Access•Brent Galloway, Chad Zanocco et al.•Review of Policy Research•2024

  • Determinants of Pro-Fracking Measure Adoption by New York Southern Tier Municipalities

    Open Access•Gwen Arnold, Kaubin Wosti Neupane•Review of Policy Research•2017

  • An Archaeology of Effectively Maintained Inequality Theory

    Open Access•Samuel R Luca, Samuel R Lucas•American Behavioral Scientist•2017

  • Industry Repertoires

    Open Access•Edward T Walker, Ion Bogdan Vasi•American Behavioral Scientist•2022

  • Not in Your Backyard! Organizational Structure, Partisanship, and the Mobilization of Nonbeneficiary Constituents against 'Fracking' in Illinois, 2013-2014

    Open Access•Fedor A Dokshin, Amanda Buday•Socius Sociological Research for…•2018

  • Spatial Regression Models

    Open Access•Tobias Rüttenauer•Sociological Methods & Research•2022

  • Subnational Environmental Policy

    Open Access•Ion Bogdan Vasi, Edward T Walker•Annual Review of Sociology•2024

  • Reaping Rewards, or Missing out? How Neoliberal Governance and State Growth Machines Condition the Impacts of Oil and Gas Development on Local Well-Being

    Open Access•Adam Mayer, Shawn Olson Hazboun et al.•Sociological Inquiry•2022

  • Boosting Your Enemies to Garner the Sympathy of Friends

    Open Access•Edward T Walker, Ion Bogdan Vasi•Social Problems•2024

  • Enforcing Hopelessness

    Open Access•A Malin, Stephanie A Malin et al.•Social Problems•2024

  • Please in My Backyard

    Colin Jerolmack, Edward T Walker•American Journal of Sociology•2018

  • Beyond Petroleum? The Diffusion of Alternative Fuels in the United States, 1994-2015

    Ion Bogdan Vasi, Michael Sauder•Sociological Quarterly•2024

  • A Public Health Frame for Fracking? Predicting Public Support for Hydraulic Fracturing

    Brian F O’neill, Matthew Jerome Schneider•Sociological Quarterly•2020

  • How and why have attitudes about cannabis legalization changed so much

    Open Access•Jacob Felson, Amy Adamczyk et al.•Social Science Research•2019

  • Insurgent identities

    Roger V Gould•Insurgent identities•1995

  • Power and Powerlessness

    John Gaventa•Power and Powerlessness•1982

  • The MoveOn Effect

    David Karpf•The MoveOn effect•2012

  • Party in the Street

    Open Access•M T Heaney, F Rojas•Party in the Street•2015

  • Event History and Survival Analysis

    P D Allison, Paul Allison•Event History and Survival Analysis•2014

  • Landowner attitudes toward natural gas and wind farm development in northern Pennsylvania

    Open Access•Jeffrey B Jacquet, Jeffrey Jacquet•Energy Policy•2012

  • Should fracking stop?

    Open Access•Robert W Howarth, Anthony Ingraffea et al.•Nature•2011

  • Boom Towns May Hinder Energy Resource Development

    Open Access•John S Gilmore•Science•1976

  • Politics, proximity and the pipeline

    Open Access•Timothy B Gravelle, Erick Lachapelle•Energy Policy•2015

  • How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010-2012

    Open Access•A Mazur•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • Grassroots for Hire

    Open Access•Edward T Walker•Grassroots for Hire•2014

  • Putting Social Movements in their Place

    Open Access•Doug Mcadam, Hilary Boudet•Putting Social Movements in Their…•2012

  • Understanding the Nimby and Lulu Phenomena

    Open Access•Carissa Schively•Journal of Planning Literature•2007

  • The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes

    Open Access•Matthew Feinberg, R Willer•Psychological Science•2012

  • Unequal Trajectories

    João Pais, Kyle Crowder et al.•Social Forces•2014

  • Energy Abundance or Environmental Worries? Analyzing Public Support for Fracking in the U nited S tates

    Open Access•Charles Davis, Jonathan M Fisk•Review of Policy Research•2014

  • Rethinking Nimbyism

    Open Access•Patrick Devine‐wright•Journal of Community & Applied…•2009

  • The role of compensation in siting hazardous facilities

    Open Access•Howard Kunreuther, Douglas Easterling et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1996

  • Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland

    Open Access•Charles R Warren, Malcolm McFadyen•Land Use Policy•2010

  • Citizen Participation and the Nimby Syndrome

    Open Access•Michael E Kraft, Bruce B Clary•The Western Political Quarterly•1991

  • Nimbys and Lulus

    Open Access•William R Freudenburg, Susan K Pastor•Journal of Social Issues•1992

  • Critical Mechanisms for Critical Masses

    Daniel J Sherman, Daniel Sherman•Mobilization An International…•2011

  • Nimbyism vs. environmentalism in attitudes toward energy development

    Kristy E H Michaud, Kristy Michaud et al.•Environmental Politics•2008

  • To Act or Not to Act

    Rachel A Wright, Hilary Boudet et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2012

  • Cultural cognition of scientific consensus

    Dan M Kahan, Hank C Jenkins‐smith et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2010

  • "No Fracking Way!" Documentary Film, Discursive Opportunity, and Local Opposition against Hydraulic Fracturing in the United States, 2010 to 2013

    Open Access•Ion Bogdan Vasi, Edward T Walker et al.•American Sociological Review•2015

  • History Repeats Itself, but How? City Character, Urban Tradition, and the Accomplishment of Place

    Harvey Molotch, William Freudenburg et al.•American Sociological Review•2000

  • Dynamics of Political Polarization

    Open Access•Delia Baldassarri, P Bearman•American Sociological Review•2007

  • The Social Production of Toxic Uncertainty

    Open Access•J Auyero, Debora Swistun•American Sociological Review•2008

  • Political Polarization as a Social Movement Outcome

    Open Access•Rory Mcveigh, David Cunningham et al.•American Sociological Review•2014

  • From local conflict to national issue

    Christopher Rootes•Environmental Politics•2013

  • The effect of industry activities on public support for 'fracking

    Hilary Boudet, Dylan Bugden et al.•Environmental Politics•2016

  • From Nimby to Niaby

    Hilary Boudet, Hilary Schaffer Boudet•Environmental Politics•2011

  • Prospecting for Participants

    Open Access•Henry E Brady, Kay Lehman Schlozman et al.•American Political Science Review•1999

  • Historical Context and Hazardous Waste Facility Siting

    Robin Saha, Paul Mohai•Social Problems•2005

  • Resource Mobilization and Citizen Protest in Communities around Three Mile Island

    Edward J Walsh•Social Problems•1981

  • Framing Processes and Social Movements

    Robert D Benford, David A Snow•Annual Review of Sociology•2000

  • Political Sociology and Social Movements

    Andrew G Walder•Annual Review of Sociology•2009

  • The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001-2010

    Open Access•Aaron M Mccright, Riley E Dunlap•Sociological Quarterly•2011

  • Group Threat and Policy Change

    Kenneth T Andrews, Charles Seguin•American Journal of Sociology•2015

  • Why Do Liberals Drink Lattes

    D Dellaposta, Yongren Shi et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2015

  • Civil Liberty in America

    Ion Bogdan Vasi, David Strang•American Journal of Sociology•2009

  • Partisans without Constraint

    Delia Baldassarri, Andrew Gelman•American Journal of Sociology•2008

  • Using Geographic Information Systems to Reconceptualize Spatial Relationships and Ecological Context

    L Downey•American Journal of Sociology•2006

  • Contagious Collectivities

    Peter Hedström•American Journal of Sociology•1994

  • Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Diffusion

    David Strang, Nancy Brandon Tuma•American Journal of Sociology•1993

  • Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power

    William A Gamson, Andre Modigliani•American Journal of Sociology•1989

  • Resource Mobilization and Social Movements

    John D Mccarthy, Mayer N Zald•American Journal of Sociology•1977

  • Nimbyism - A re-examination of the phenomenon

    Open Access•Peter Esaiasson•Social Science Research•2014

Unique citing works60
Citations per year6,67
Citation span2017 - 2025 (9)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 60

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae