Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Critical Mechanisms for Critical Masses

Exploring Variation in Opposition to Low-Level Radioactive Waste Site Proposals

Bibliographic Data

ID7921101
AuthorsDaniel J Sherman (University of Puget Sound, corresponding author), Daniel Sherman (Environmental Policy and Decision Making, University of Puget Sound)
Year2011
Volume16
Issue1
Pages81-100
Publication date2011-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMobilization An International Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1086-671X • E-ISSN: 1938-1514
PublisherMobilization Journal (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.17813/maiq.16.1.gt7617043n132422
OpenAlexW1525156780
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited4

Between 1986 and 1993, local activists in the U.S. organized more than 900 collective acts of public opposition to low-level radioactive waste site proposals across twenty-one counties. Yet, the number of such acts varied significantly across the counties. Both waste-siting professionals and social movement scholars have sought to identify factors of mobilization to explain such variation. An analysis of these cases reveals that a focus limited to pre-existing factors of mobilization—whether the demographic and economic factors favored by siting professionals, or the mobilization and political opportunity structures of the "classic social movement agenda"—badly misjudges mobilization. A paired comparison of two counties that differed dramatically in the number of acts of collective opposition mustered over the course of the siting process demonstrates the importance of social mechanisms that shape just how a community interacts with its political resources. The key differences between the two counties lie in the setting, sequence, and in the combination of the following social mechanisms: social appropriation, identify shift, and the attribution of threat and opportunity. To understand the assertion of local political power in an implementation process such as siting efforts, we need to understand not only the political resources available in a community context, but also the way in which human relationships shape the perception and application of that context

Appropriation · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political opportunity · Political science · Politics · Resource mobilization · Social movement · Sociology · Law · Risk Perception and Management · Social Capital and Networks · Social Media and Politics

  • Studying Complex Interactions and Outcomes Through Qualitative Comparative Analysis

    Markus Kroger•Studying Complex Interactions and…•2021

  • Activists in Politics

    Timo Böhm•Social Problems•2015

  • Whose Backyard and What's at Issue? Spatial and Ideological Dynamics of Local Opposition to Fracking in New York State, 2010 to 2013

    Open Access•Fedor A Dokshin•American Sociological Review•2016

  • Conditions for successful environmental justice mobilizations

    Open Access•David J He, Lacee A Satcher•Environmental Politics•2019

  • Dynamics of Contention

    Open Access•Doug Mcadam, Sidney Tarrow et al.•Dynamics of Contention•2001

  • Power in Movement

    Open Access•Sidney Tarrow, Sidney G Tarrow•Power in Movement•1998

  • Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970

    Doug Mcadam•Political process and the…•1999

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,36
Citation span2015 - 2021 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae