Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Community Support for a Gold Cyanide Process Mine

Resident and Leader Differences in Rural Montana

Bibliographic Data

ID2486701
AuthorsRebecca T Richards (University of Montana), Rodney L Brod (University of Montana)
Year2004
Volume69
Issue4
Pages552-575
Publication date2004-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRural Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0036-0112 • E-ISSN: 1549-0831
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1526/0036011042722804
OpenAlexW2041781376
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited39

Previous studies have established that community residents and leaders differ in their support for hazardous waste facility siting in rural areas (Spies et al. 1998). We examine whether these same differences exist in rural communities that face other high-risk development decisions by analyzing resident and leader support for a proposed gold cyanide process (GCP) mine in Montana. Compared to proposed hazardous waste facilities, a much stronger predictor of both resident and leader support in the GCP mine context is recreancy, or distrust in institutions and outside interveners. However, perceived economic benefits remain key differences between residents and leaders in both the GCP mine and hazardous waste facility cases

Archaeology · Business · Context (archaeology · Distrust · Environmental planning · Geography · Gold mining · Hazardous waste · Political science · Rural community · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Waste management · Engineering · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Law · Mining and Resource Management

  • Trust in Risk Management

    Open Access•Timothy C Earle•Risk Analysis•2010

  • Recreancy Revisited

    Liesel Ashley Ritchie, Duane A Gill et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2012

  • Models and Methods for Creating Sustainable Community-Based Development Organizations in Diverse Communities

    Jerry W Robinson, Brent D Hales•Community Development•2007

  • They Don't Want to Know; They Don't Want to Hear

    Open Access•Steven Tuttle, Emily J Wornell•Rural Sociology•2025

  • Community Support of Ethanol Plants

    Open Access•Carmen Bain, Anastasia H Prokos et al.•Rural Sociology•2012

  • A new species of trouble

    Kai Erikson•A new species of trouble•1994

  • Polycentricity and Local Public Economies

    Open Access•Michael Dean McGinnis, Michael Mcginnis•Polycentricity and local public…•1999

  • Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks

    Open Access•James Flynn, Paul Slovic et al.•Risk Analysis•1994

  • Perception of Hazards

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist, George Cvetkovich•Risk Analysis•2000

  • The Media and Genetically Modified Foods

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Susan Miles et al.•Risk Analysis•2002

  • International Capital Versus Local Population

    Roldan Muradian, J Martínez‐alier et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2003

  • Hazardous wastes and differing perceptions of risk in Sumter county, Alabama

    C Bailey, Charles E Faupel et al.•Society & Natural Resources•1992

  • Using the Coorientation Model to Compare Community Leaders' and Local Residents' Views About Hudson River Ecosystem Restoration

    Nancy A Connelly, Barbara A Knuth•Society & Natural Resources•2002

  • Advocating rurality? The repositioning of rural local government

    Open Access•Michael Woods, Mike Woods•Journal of Rural Studies•1998

  • The governance of rural areas

    Open Access•Marjorie Goodwin, Mark Goodwin•Journal of Rural Studies•1998

  • An overview of land use conflicts in mining communities

    Open Access•Gavin Hilson•Land Use Policy•2002

  • Citizen Participation and the Nimby Syndrome

    Michael E Kraft, Bruce B Clary•The Western Political Quarterly•1991

  • Tracing the Veins

    Janet L Finn, Janet Finn•Tracing the veins•1998

  • Local Governance, the Crises of Fordism and the Changing Geographies of Regulation

    Marjorie Goodwin, Mark Goodwin et al.•Transactions of the Institute of…•1996

  • Opportunity/Threat Responses to Nuclear Waste Disposal Facilities 1

    Open Access•Richard S Krannich, Stan L Albrecht•Rural Sociology•1995

  • Coping With Tragedies of the Commons

    Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Annual Review of Political Science•1999

  • Intergovernmental Complexity in Nuclear Waste Disposal Policy

    Open Access•Eric B Herzik, Alvin H Mushkatel•Review of Policy Research•1991

  • Public Opposition To The Siting Of The High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository

    Open Access•K David Pijawka, Alvin H Mushkatel•Review of Policy Research•1991

  • Externalities, Learning and Governance

    Open Access•Bert Helmsing•Development and Change•2001

  • The Butte Irish

    Paula Petrik, David M Emmons•Western Historical Quarterly•1990

  • Oil on the Edge

    Valerie J Gunter, Valerie Gunter et al.•Social Forces•1997

  • Support for Waste Facility Siting

    Open Access•Sherrill Spie, Sherrill Spies et al.•Rural Sociology•1998

  • Digging Deeper

    Open Access•William R Freudenburg, Scott Frickel•Rural Sociology•1994

  • Attitudes and Bureaucrats

    Open Access•A E Luloff, Donald G Hodges•Rural Sociology•1992

  • Addictive Economies

    Open Access•William R Freudenburg•Rural Sociology•1992

  • A Closer Look at 'Local Control

    Open Access•Robert Gramling, William R Freudenburg•Rural Sociology•1990

  • The City as a Growth Machine

    Harvey Molotch•American Journal of Sociology•1976

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,26
Citation span2007 - 2025 (19)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae