Found and buy, study and appropriate, build and reconfigure
The three stages in turning the 'Coptic domain' in Jerusalem into the Church of Saint Alexander Nevsky (1856-1896)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2631420 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elena Astafieva (Centre d’études des Mondes Russe, Caucasien et Centre-Européen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 22 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European journal of Turkish studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1773-0546 • E-ISSN: 1773-0546 |
| Publisher | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/ejts.6195 |
| OpenAlex | W3107362865 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
This research 1 is part of the study of Russian policy in the Arab territories of the Ottoman Empire that has developed since the collapse of the USSR and the opening of many Russian archives. From the 1960s on, English-language historians began working on the Russian presence in the Levant (Stavrou 1963, Hopwood 1969). However, like Soviet historians, they had then no access to all the Imperial Russian sources, from the State, the Orthodox Church and other religions, which would have enabled them to analyse all the political, religious, diplomatic and cultural aspects of that presence. Since 1991, Russian historical production 2 has been characterised by excellent knowledge of the Russian diplomatic sources but no attempt to situate Imperial policy in the Levant within a wider international context (Lissovoj 2006). However, since the 2010s, new research has been based not only on the Russian archives but also European diplomatic archives that provide a wider view of Russian activities in Palestine and Syria throughout the long 19th century (Fairey 2012; Vovchenko 2013; Iakuchev 2013)
Ancient history · Archaeology · Empire · Ottoman empire · Political science · Politics · Classics · History · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |