The contribution of increases in family benefits to Australia's early 21st-century fertility increase
An empirical analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2636640 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nick Parr (0000-0002-7539-912X, Macquarie University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Pages | 215-244 |
| Publication date | 2011-07-19 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Demographic Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1435-9871 • E-ISSN: 2363-7064 |
| Publisher | Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.4054/demres.2011.25.6 |
| OpenAlex | W2129831203 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 47 |
Between 2001 and 2008 Australiaâ s total fertility increased from 1.73 to 1.96. This period also saw changes to family benefits, most notably the introduction of a universal, flat-rate at birth payment and an increased subsidisation of child care. This
Birth rate · Demographic economics · Economics · Family planning · Fertility · Geography · Payment · Population · Research methodology · Sociology · Total fertility rate · demographic modeling and climate adaptation · Demography · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Fertility, immigration, and lifetime wages under imperfect labor substitution
The Association Between Women's Education and Fertility, Moderating Effect of Unemployment in Context of Polygyny in Pakistan
Government policy and global fertility change
Trends in differentials in the workforce participation of mothers with young children in Australia 2002–2008
Family policies, social norms and marital fertility decisions
Family policy and couples’ labour supply
The impact of Covid-19 on fertility intention in Australian adults
Entre l'effet tempo et l'effet quantum
Who responds to fertility-boosting incentives? Evidence from pro-natal policies in Australia
Lifetime probabilities of multigenerational caregiving and labor force attachment in Australia
A method for socially evaluating the effects of long-run demographic paths on living standards
Non-marital pregnancy and the second demographic transition in Australia in historical perspective
Family policies in the context of low fertility and social structure
Patterns of Contraceptive Use in Australia
Family Background, Schooling and Childlessness in Australia
Using a Reproductive Life Course Approach to Understand Contraceptive Method Use in Australia
How Employed Mothers in Australia Find Time for Both Market Work and Childcare
Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models
Welfare state context, female earnings and childbearing
Contemporary Motherhood
Multilevel Statistical Models
Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility
Subsidizing the Stork
The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries
Sustaining Fertility through Public Policy
Is money the main reason mothers return to work after childbearing
Why do English-speaking countries have relatively high fertility
Which women stop at one child in Australia
Did Australia’s Baby Bonus Increase Fertility Intentions and Births
The impact of monetary incentives on general fertility rates in Western Australia
Occupational Concentration and Mobility of Asian Immigrants in Australia
Overview Chapter 7
Summary and general conclusions
The End of "Lowest-Low" Fertility
On the Quantum and Tempo of Fertility
The Contraceptive Pill and Women's Employment as Factors in Fertility Change in Britain 1963-1980
Family Benefits and Fertility
A New Approach to Explaining Fertility Patterns
Economic Recession and Fertility in the Developed World
Gender Equity in Theories of Fertility Transition
Low Fertility and the State
Satisfaction with life as an antecedent of fertility
Tempo-Adjusted Period Parity Progression Measures, Fertility Postponement and Completed Cohort Fertility
Misleading Policy Messages Derived from the Period TFR
Does Father Care Mean Fathers Share
| Citations per year | 0.93 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2025 (14) |
| Highly cited | No |