Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Catherine Benoît , Jane Sandall , Raymond DeVries , Edwin van Teijlingen , Sirpa Wrede
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Victoria Libraries, King's College London;, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, University of Aberdeen & Bournemouth University;, University of Helsinki (Finland);
ANO 2009
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Sociological Research Online
ISSN 1360-7804
E-ISSN 1360-7804
EDITORA Sage Publications Ltd
DOI 10.5153/sro.1860
CITAÇÕES 1
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 66ce696373d9d8d2961488b98415ae7b

Resumo

In lay terms, childbirth is regarded as a purely biological event: what is more natural than birth and death? On the other hand, social scientists have long understood that 'natural' events are socially structured. In the case of birth, sociologists have examined the social and cultural shaping of its timing, outcome, and the organization of care throughout the perinatal period. Continuing in this tradition, we examine the peculiar social design of birth in the United States of America, contrasting this design with the ways birth is organised in Europe. We begin by showing how several key characteristics of the US health care system – including its inherent social inequality, its high level of medicalisation, and the substantial influence of private medical practice and insurance companies – influence the organization of maternity care there. We then explore how cultural characteristics of American society – its emphasis on individuality, the influence of moral conservatism in US politics, and the ease with which ordinary people take court action (the so-called 'litigation culture') – shape the delivery of care at birth. We conclude with a consideration of the implications of US maternity care exceptionalism for comparative sociological analysis.

Ferramentas