Industrial Relations, Manipulative or Democratic
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2787084 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hilda Weiss Parker (Brooklyn College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1958 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 25-33 |
| Publication date | 1958-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Economics and Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9246 • E-ISSN: 1536-7150 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1958.tb00285.x |
| OpenAlex | W2094874907 |
| Language | EN |
Three historical periods of motivating workers toward increasing productivity still "coexist" today: negative incentives, external rewards, forms of workers' participation in industry. Varying modes of joint consultation at top levels existing in many countries are contrasted with American industrial research emphasizing workers' participation on the workshop level. The problems of "common goals" and "manipulation" in industry are considered as contributing factors to the gap between those two levels. To fill it, industrial sociologists should follow Mayo and others in the use of 'clinical' research to find new institutional forms for a democratic work process based on collective bargaining
Business · Collective bargaining · Democracy · Economic growth · Economics · Incentive · Industrial democracy · Labour economics · Management · Market economy · Political economy · Political science · Process (computing) · Productivity · Public relations · Work (physics) · Employment and Welfare Studies · Engineering · Industrial relations · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Management and Organizational Studies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |