Tigre Syntax and Semitic Ethiopian

Bibliographic Data

ID2789329
AuthorsEaz, S Eaz (corresponding author)
Year1980
Volume43
Issue2
Pages235-250
Publication date1980-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0041-977X • E-ISSN: 1474-0699
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0041977x00115617
OpenAlexW2144798145
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited8

It has long been argued that the peculiar syntactic traits which typify the modern Semitic Ethiopian languages can be accounted for by the Cushitic substratum, notably the word order of the sentence and the system of qualification (the qualifier-qualified order of elements). It has been suggested that among these languages Tigre is 'more Semitic' since (a) it is much less rigid as regards word order, and (b) 'it may optionally have either the Semitic pattern or the Cushitic one'. A parallel diachronic statement would be that as regards its syntax Tigre was more successful in resisting Cushitic influence or, for some reason, less exposed to it. Here, to avoid the problem of measuring the syntactic features of Tigre in general Semitic terms, Gə'əaz is usually taken as the mode for a Semitic language. In this respect it follows that descriptively Tigre is more Gə'əz-like than the other modern Semitic Ethiopian languages. In spite of the plausibility of such an explanation, it seems to be a matter of scholarly tradition rather than the result of thorough investigation, i.e. the belief that Tigre is the odd man out among its modern relations by virtue of its syntax is an impression rather than a proven observation

Arabic · Linguistics · Semitic languages · Sentence · Syntax · Word order · African history and culture analysis · Computer Science · History · Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub