Open Science and the Science-Society Relationship
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2806330 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Martin Lakomý (0000-0002-7591-1402, Masaryk University, autor correspondente), Renata Hlavová (Masaryk University), Hana Macháčková (0000-0001-9498-9208, Masaryk University) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 246-255 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-06-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0147-2011 • E-ISSN: 1936-4725 |
| Editora | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12115-019-00361-w |
| OpenAlex | W2955211793 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 6 |
| Referências citadas | 93 |
Nowadays, the prevailing trend in the science-society relationship is to engage with the broader public, which is beneficial for the public, scientific institutes, scientific findings, and the legitimacy of science as a whole. This article provides a broad review of the rapidly growing research on Open Science and identifies the gaps in the current knowledge for future research. The review focuses on the science-society relationship, such that knowledge from this field is summarised and systematised. Insight into the most salient topics, including science communication, public engagement with science, public cognition of science, and challenges and potential unintended consequences connected to interactions with the public are examined. The first section of the paper focuses on science communication which involves efforts and approaches to inform the public about science by the most effective means. The section on public engagement reviews how scientists and scientific institutions are increasingly involved in direct interactions with the public and different groups of stakeholders to make science more open. The section focusing on public cognition of science provides information about public knowledge, perception, and trust regarding science, which both determines and is formed by public engagement. Last, risks, ethical issues, and data issues connected to the implementation of Open Science principles are reviewed, as there are many unintended consequences of Open Science which are examined by this current research. In conclusion, research covering the science-society relationship is rapidly growing. However, it brings multiple challenges as well as opportunities which are captured and discussed in a variety of existing studies. This article provides a coherent overview of this field in order to bring more comprehensible knowledge to scientists, scientific institutions, and outreach professionals
Biology · Citizen science · Engineering ethics · Legitimacy · Open Science · Perception · Political science · Public awareness of science · Public engagement · Public relations · Salient · Science communication · Science education · Science, technology, society and environment education · Social science · Social science education · Sociology · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Unintended consequences · Animal and Plant Science Education · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Engineering · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology
Citizen Science from the Perspective of Higher Education Professors
Communicating Contested Science in a Polarized World
Societal impact of university research in the written press
Why Are Scientific Experts Perceived as Trustworthy? Emotional Assessment within TV and YouTube Videos
Contested science communication
Limits and benefits of participatory agenda setting for research and innovation
Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society
Attitudes towards science
Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States
The Public's Bounded Understanding of Science
Media sources, credibility, and perceptions of science
Evoking vigilance
Audience reach of science on television in 10 European countries
Why people attend science festivals
Measuring the perceived uncertainty of scientific evidence and its relationship to engagement with science
Communicating through humour
Factual accuracy and the cultural context of science in popular media
Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science
‘The kind of mildly curious sort of science interested person like me’
Citizen science on a smartphone
Faith in science in global perspective
Who is willing to pay for science? On the relationship between public perception of science and the attitude to public funding of science
Public engagement in research funding
Precaution in public
Communicating science in public controversies
Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institutions
When science becomes too easy
The gap in scientific knowledge and role of science communication in South Korea
Science, the public, and social elites
Science and Spectacle in the European Enlightenment
Public Understanding of Science
Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology
The measurement of civic scientific literacy
Global warming’s five Germanys
Science communication on YouTube
Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures
Sources, Characteristics and Effects of Mass Media Communication on Science
Innovating innovation policy
Views of Ethical Best Practices in Sharing Individual-Level Data From Medical and Public Health Research
Civic crowdfunding research
Accessing Science Through Media
On the Shoulders of YouTube
Democratizing science in the eighteenth century
Translating psychological science to the public
What Science Communication Scholars Think About Training Scientists to Communicate
Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment
From Public Understanding to Public Engagement
Science Mass Communication
Advancing Science Communication
Communicative Aspects of the Public-Science Relationship Explored
What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda
Responsible research and innovation
Deliberations about deliberative methods
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 6 |