A Property Rights Paradox
George and Rothbard on the Conservation of Environmental Resources
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2822502 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bruce Yandle (Clemson University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1982 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 183-183 |
| Publication date | 1982-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Economics and Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9246 • E-ISSN: 1536-7150 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1982.tb03171.x |
| OpenAlex | W2040836439 |
| Language | EN |
Murray N. Rothbard is recognized as one of the most articulate modern critics of Henry George's land value tax. A leading libertarian thinker, Rothbard condemns George's recommendation that government act to affect private transactions in land, arguing that such interventions infringe on previously defined private property rights. However, Rothbard's social system has no explicit mechanism for accommodating the emergence of tradeable property rights to newly recognized environmental resources. In effect, Rothbard calls for controls on such resources-no trading. Henry George, on the other hand, provides for the evolution of new property rights and their emergence into private markets. The paradox here is that George's solution to the property rights question might accommodate the social yearnings of one of his most severe critics, Murray N. Rothbard
Economics · Epistemology · George (robot) · Government (linguistics) · Law and economics · Political science · Private property · Property (philosophy) · Property rights · Property value · Public property · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · History · Law · Philosophy · Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
| Highly cited | No |
|---|