Grammatical Relations and Surface Cases
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2876355 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Masayoshi Shibatani (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1977 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 789 |
| Publication date | 1977-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0097-8507 • E-ISSN: 1535-0665 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/412912 |
| OpenAlex | W2002733453 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 58 |
| References cited | 4 |
While relational grammar regards grammatical relations as theoretical primitives that play a central role in the formulation of syntactic rules, there has been no critical assessment of the fact that grammatical relations and surface cases are often confused by both traditional and transformational grammarians. This paper shows that grammatical relations and cases must be clearly distinguished, as there are distinct rules that are sensitive to each. Investigation of the data from Japanese and Korean specifically shows that, in these languages, the rule of Quantifier Floating—which the proponents of relational grammar have alleged to be universally sensitive to grammatical relations—must, in fact, be stated in terms of cases, while the rules of Reflexivization and Subject Honorification must be formulated in terms of grammatical relations. In addition to these syntactic processes, this paper critically examines whether there are, in fact, two subjects in the so-called double-subject construction in Japanese
Linguistics · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
O que difere uma língua ergativa de uma língua nominativa
On the Nature of Grammatical Relations
Passives and Related Constructions
Are traversal objects objects
Reconsidering the history of like
Cause, causer and causee
A Japanese and Ainu linguistic feast
Predicate union and the syntax of Japanese passives
The accusative and infinitive in Latin
Distinctions and Generalizations
Regressive Apicalization in Na'isha
The Oxford handbook of case
Honorifics
Heritage Languages and Their Speakers
The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity
Case In Iranian
Checking Theory and Dative Subject Constructions in Japanese and Korean
Dependency formation interacts with case
Nomina Bertindak Datif Bahasa Jepang
Between syntax and discourse
Case marking of objects of Stative predicates in Japanese∗
Grammaticalization of Japanese Verbals
Revisiting grammatical particles from an interactional perspective
An analysis of student errors in the use of Japanese ‐WA and ‐GA∗
Nominative-genitive conversion and agreement in Japanese
Double complement unaccusatives in Japanese
Syntactic predication in Japanese
The affective construction in Yoron Ryukyuan
Cross-linguistic studies of directionality in first language acquisition
On Korean Case Stacking
Japanese expository prose
Implicit Arguments in Japanese Potentials and Resultatives
Honorification as Agreement
Word Formation in a Modular Theory of Grammar
Logical, syntactic, and morphological notions of subject
On case markers
Does headedness affect processing? A new look at the VO–OV contrast
Predicate union and the syntax of Japanese causatives
The syntax of variable behavior verbs
Double-subject and complex-predicate constructions
When syntax and semantics of compounds matter to voicing alternations
Successive-cyclic case assignment
Four-Way Case Systems
Conditions on Agreement in Japanese
The Pragmatic Nature of the So-Called Subject Marker Ga in Japanese
Head position and parsing ambiguity
Second Language Processing of Korean Floating Numeral Quantifiers
Compositionality, lexical integrity, and agglutinative morphology
Falsifiability and repeatability in generative grammar
Radical Pro Drop and the Morphology of Pronouns
On (partially) quirky subjects, numeral subjects, and subject-oriented anaphor binding
More on the Anaphor Agreement Effect
Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure
Two types of existentials
Japanese grammar and universal grammar
A focus-based analysis of Nominative objects in Japanese
Quantifier float and information processing
Binding of Indeterminate Pronouns and Clause Structure in Japanese
| Unique citing works | 58 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,23 |
| Citation span | 1979 - 2025 (47) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 47 |