Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

I think that's not an assumption you ought to make

Challenging presuppositions in inquiry testimony

Bibliographic Data

ID2887409
AuthorsSusan Ehrlich (York University), Jack Sidnell (0000-0002-7546-872X, University of Toronto)
Year2006
Volume35
Issue05
Pages655-676
Publication date2006-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguage in Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0047-4045 • E-ISSN: 1469-8013
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0047404506060313
OpenAlexW2120603548
LanguageEN
Citations received23
References cited11

This article examines data drawn from a 2001 Ontario (Canada) provincial inquiry into the deaths of seven people as a result of water contamination in a small Ontario town. The examination focuses on question-answer sequences in which the premier of Ontario, Michael Harris, attempted to resist lawyers' attempts to control and restrict his responses. In particular, on the basis of the data it is argued that the power of cross-examining lawyers does not reside solely in their ability to ask controlling and restrictive questions of witnesses, but rather is crucially dependent on their ability to compel witnesses to produce straightforward, or “type-conforming,” answers to these controlling and restrictive questions. The witness whose testimony is analyzed was not compelled to produce answers that logically conformed to the form of the lawyers' questions (i.e., “yes” or “no”) and, as a result, often usurped control over the topical agenda of the proceedings. In this sense, the present work builds on Eades's conclusion that “we cannot rely on question form to discover how witnesses are controlled.”A previous version of this article was presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 15, Newcastle, U.K., in April 2004. We thank audience members at that conference and two reviewers for Language in Society for comments on previous versions. The research on which this article is based was funded in part by a SSHRCC Regular Research Grant (#410-2000-1330) to the first author

Epistemology · Presupposition · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Rhetoric and Communication Studies

  • Knowledge moves in conversational exchanges

    Peter Muntigl•Functions of Language•2009

  • Presupposition and Entailment

    Open Access•Jack Sidnell•The International Encyclopedia of…•2020

  • The workings of multiple principles in student-teacher interactions

    Open Access•Mieke Breukelman, Myrte N Gosen et al.•Linguistics and Education•2023

  • Language games and their types

    Open Access•Jonathan Ginzburg, Kwong-Cheong Wong•Linguistics and Philosophy•2024

  • Challenges of Interviewers' Institutional Positionings

    Karen Tracy, J S Robles•Communication Methods and Measures•2010

  • Presupposition as investigator certainty in a police interrogation

    Open Access•Philip Gaines•Discourse & Society•2018

  • Talk, listen, think’

    Open Access•Abigaël Candelas de la Ossa•Discourse & Society•2016

  • Beyond texts in context

    Open Access•Jennifer Andrus•Discourse & Society•2011

  • Pursuing Answers to Questions in Broadcast Journalism

    Tanya Romaniuk•Research on Language and Social…•2013

  • Responding With Resistance to Wh -Questions in Japanese Talk-in-Interaction

    Makoto Hayashi, Shuya Kushida•Research on Language and Social…•2013

  • Knowing how to present yourself by knowing how to recognize false true facts

    Open Access•I Arminen, Anna S M Heino•Journal of Pragmatics•2022

  • La función de las preguntas en un discurso agonal

    Open Access•José Luis Blas-Arroyo•Discurso & sociedad•2010

  • “Signature Habits” and “Strict Rules”

    Jennifer Sclafani, Nasiba Norova•Journal of Language and…•2026

  • I just need a yes or no

    Open Access•Marissa Caldwell, Joshua Raclaw•Discourse Studies•2023

  • It's just a process

    Open Access•Theresa Castor•Discourse Studies•2009

  • Questions, questioning, and institutional practices

    Open Access•Karen Tracy, J S Robles et al.•Discourse Studies•2009

  • Scaling as an argumentative resource in television talk shows

    Open Access•Josephine Lee•Journal of Pragmatics•2019

  • Negative interrogatives and adversarial uptake

    Open Access•Karin Aronsson•Journal of Pragmatics•2018

  • Language ideology, fractal recursivity, and discursive agency in the legal construction of linguistic evidence

    Open Access•Jennifer Andrus•Language in Society•2012

  • Transformative answers

    Open Access•T Stivers, Makoto Hayashi•Language in Society•2010

  • Doing 'being interrupted' in political talk

    Open Access•Marta Baffy•Language in Society•2020

  • Invoking Uncertainty

    Open Access•Keith Cox•Journal of Health and Social…•2023

  • Jurisdiction

    Justin B Richland•Annual Review of Anthropology•2013

  • Representing Rape

    Susan Ehrlich•Representing Rape•2003

  • Just Words

    John M Conley, William M O’barr et al.•Just Words•2019

  • The impact of court interpreting on the coerciveness of leading questions

    Susan Berk‐seligson, Susan Berk-Seligson•International Journal of Speech…•1999

  • There’s Risks in Everything

    Open Access•Jack Sidnell•Discourse & Society•2004

  • Answers as Interactional Products

    G Button•Social Psychology Quarterly•1987

  • Grammar and Social Organization

    G Raymond•American Sociological Review•2003

  • The strategic use of questions in court

    Open Access•Hanni Woodbury•Semiotica•1984

  • Questions as a mode of control in magistrates' courts

    Sandra Harris, S D Harris•International Journal of the…•1984

  • I don't think it's an answer to the question

    Open Access•Diana Eades•Language in Society•2000

Unique citing works23
Citations per year1,35
Citation span2009 - 2026 (18)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 22

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae