The Pronoun *so, *sā, *tod and the Indo-Hittite Hypothesis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2893252 |
|---|---|
| Authors | E H Sturtevant (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1939 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 11 |
| Publication date | 1939-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0097-8507 • E-ISSN: 1535-0665 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/409404 |
| OpenAlex | W2326577166 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
As early as 1921 Emil Forrer advanced the hypothesis that Hittite separated from the Pre-Indo-European parent stock before the time of the Primitive Indo-European language that has been partially reconstructed by the comparative method. Forrer did not undertake to prove his point, but I have tried to do so in a series of articles
Hittite language · Linguistics · Pronoun · Ancient Near East History · Linguistics and Cultural Studies · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.05 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1965 - 2021 (57) |
| Highly cited | No |