Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Good Gifts, Bad Gifts, and Rights

Cambodian Popular Perceptions and the 2013 Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID2899255
AuthorsAstrid Norén-Nilsson (0000-0002-4902-7285, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume89
Issue4
Pages795-815
Publication date2016-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePacific Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0030-851X • E-ISSN: 1715-3379
PublisherPacific Affairs (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5509/2016894795
OpenAlexW2566535069
LanguageEN
Citations received14

In the Cambodian national elections in 2013, the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP) experienced a strong surge in support, finishing a close second to the long-incumbent Cambodian People’s Party (CPP). Whilst the CNRP campaigned on an anti-money politics, rights-based agenda, the CPP has relied on gift-giving practices to maintain links with voters. This article explores changing popular conceptions of provision to assess to what extent a democratic, rights-based conscience in Cambodia has emerged under the current neo-patrimonial regime. Building on qualitative interviews with 192 voters in post-election Cambodia, it finds that gift-giving practices play a different role than current academic theorizations of popular politics, and Cambodian popular politics in particular, would lead us to expect. Ordinary Cambodians are found to make a distinction between contingent and non-contingent exchanges in electoral mobilization, rejecting the former and embracing the latter. CPP gift giving in its current guise is consequently devoid of popular legitimacy across the political camps. At the same time, the idea of meritorious gift giving lives on as an ideal, especially among CNRP supporters

Advertising · Business · Perception · Political science · Cambodian History and Society · Psychology · Social Psychology · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies

  • Gifts for votes? Vote buying as a predictor of turnout in Latin America

    Open Access•Milan Školník•Latin American Policy•2022

  • Kem Ley and Cambodian Citizenship Today

    Open Access•Astrid Norén-Nilsson•Journal of Current Southeast…•2019

  • Contesting China-funded Projects in Cambodia

    Sreang Chheat•Asian Studies Review•2021

  • Liberalism in Cambodia

    Open Access•Astrid Norén-Nilsson•Asian Studies Review•2022

  • The Rise of Sophisticated Authoritarianism in Southeast Asia

    Open Access•Lee Morgenbesser•Rise of Sophisticated Authoritarian…•2020

  • Cambodia

    Open Access•Kheang Un, Sivhuoch Ou•Cambodia•2019

  • Pockets of liberal media in authoritarian regimes

    A Beban, Laura Schoenberger et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2019

  • Zombie resistance

    Open Access•Sabina Lawreniuk•Transactions of the Institute of…•2022

  • Regime types and winner-loser Gaps in support for democracy in East Asia

    Chun‐ying Wu, Chin-En Wu•Democratization•2022

  • Promoting Democracy Under Electoral Authoritarianism

    Open Access•Susan Hyde, Emily Lamb et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2023

  • Organizational Strength and Authoritarian Durability in Cambodia

    Jing Jing Luo, Kheang Un•Communist and Post-Communist…•2022

  • Labour and Electoral Politics in Cambodia

    Kristy Ward, M Ford•Journal of Contemporary Asia•2022

  • After the Grab? Land Control and Regime Survival in Cambodia since 2012

    Neil Loughlin, Sarah Milne•Journal of Contemporary Asia•2021

  • Adaptive Authoritarian Resilience

    Kimly Ngoun•Journal of Contemporary Asia•2022

Unique citing works14
Citations per year1,75
Citation span2018 - 2023 (6)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae