Cats, dogs, and sweets in the clinical negotiation of reality
On politeness and coherence in pediatric discourse
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2910300 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Karin Aronsson (0000-0002-7383-540X, Linköping University), Bengt Rundström (Linköping University) |
| Year | 1989 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 483-504 |
| Publication date | 1989-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language in Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-4045 • E-ISSN: 1469-8013 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0047404500013877 |
| OpenAlex | W2049516826 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 29 |
| References cited | 16 |
Doctor-parent-child interaction is analyzed in terms of Brown and Levinson's (1978) theory on facework and politeness. The determinism of the Brown and Levinson (B & L) model is discussed in terms of the present data, which show how discourse is a matter of continuousnegotiationbetween participants. For instance, it is shown how the on record/off record distinction is best understood sequentially. When doctors seem to sense that respectful indirectness does not work, they tend to phrase their requests in an increasingly direct fashion. Hence, the full meaning of doctors' directives is revealed only via the outcome of social interaction, regulated by both parties (doctor and patient/spokesperson). This means that utterances must be analyzed sequentially (and not in a mechanistic, static fashion). Moreover, discourse cannot be understood in terms of any unidirectional social determinism. It is also shown here how doctors can talk to parents through children, as it were. Within a joking relationship format with the child, it is possible for a doctor to convey potentially offensive information to the child's parent. Doctors' moves can thus be seen as direct or indirect depending on type of addressee perspective (parent as participant or as side-participant). The pediatric multiparty setting thus highlights the impossibility of a more formalistic application of the B & L model. (Politeness, facework, negotiations, medical discourse, child discourse
Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) · Dialogic · Discourse analysis · Face negotiation theory · Interpersonal communication · Linguistics · Meaning (existential) · Negotiation · Offensive · Pedagogy · Perspective (graphical) · Politeness · Politeness Theory · Sociology · Utterance · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
Identity-in-Interaction and Social Choreography
Managing Conflicting Goals in Supportive Interaction
Building a Child’s Trust before a Medical Procedure
Is It Polite to Hiss
Discursive Positioning in Practitioner-Parent-Child Communication in Traditional Chinese Medicine Consultations
Epistemic Trust as an Interactional Accomplishment in Pediatric Well-Child Visits
Negotiation of Institutional Roles in Bilingual Encounters in Guatemala
Building rapport in occupational therapy with autistic children
Doctor–parent–child communication. A (re)view of the literature
So, what test do you prefer?” Negotiating politic behaviour in an L2 prenatal genetic counselling setting in Hong Kong
Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication
Activity contracts and directives in everyday family politics
Reconstructing Topical Sensitivity
Intellectual discussion in the academy as situated discourse
Facework and Utilitarian Relevance in the Disambiguation of Statements With Two Indirect Interpretations
Analysing Health Communication
Children's Intent Participation in a Pediatric Community of Practice
Une pratique de gestion de la critique en pédiatrie
The principal principles of pragmatic inference
Coming of age in family therapy talk
Identity Enactment in Intellectual Discussion
Draw-a-Monster
Praise and self-praise
"Doing being a good parent" in the pediatric clinic
Impoliteness revisited
Endearment and address terms in family life
FTAs and Erskine May
Third party interaction in the medical context
Cats, dogs, and sweets in the clinical negotiation of reality
Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction
Interaction Ritual
The ceremonial order of the clinic
Politeness in context
Politeness
Discourse
Cats, dogs, and sweets in the clinical negotiation of reality
Accommodating the elderly
Hearers and Speech Acts
Language style as audience design
The Courtroom Hearing as a Middle Ground
Politeness Strategies and Doctor-Patient Communication. On the Social Choreography of Collaborative Thinking
The Discourse of Requests
| Unique citing works | 29 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.78 |
| Citation span | 1989 - 2025 (37) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 28 |