Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese

A meta-analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID2917080
AuthorsDongju Li (0000-0001-8682-8025, Southwest University), Cong Shu (Southwest University), Xu Chen (0000-0002-8164-3088, Southwest University, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume36
Issue9
Pages2652-2676
Publication date2019-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Social and Personal Relationships (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0265-4075 • E-ISSN: 1460-3608
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0265407518793533
OpenAlexW2890073764
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited31

Although several studies support evolutionary perspectives on sex differences in romantic attachment, these sex differences in East Asia remain controversial. To estimate the effect size of sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese adults, a meta-analysis of sex differences was conducted in the present study. This meta-analysis was based on 111 samples using the Chinese version of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale and its revised version. The findings suggest that the effect size of sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese adults is relatively small. Overall, females demonstrated higher anxiety and avoidance than males, with substantial between-study heterogeneity. Sex differences were largest in community samples, with higher avoidance and lower anxiety in males. There were smaller sex differences in college student samples, with higher anxiety and avoidance in females. The degree of sex differences also varied across geographical regions, with high-stress and high-fertility reproductive environments showing smaller sex differences in general and larger sex differences in extreme conditions. Sex differences in anxiety increased linearly with age, whereas those in avoidance remained unchanged. The results support evolutionary perspectives of sex differences in romantic attachment, which assume that the average sex differences in romantic attachment styles should be relatively small in most populations, and many possible factors might moderate such differences. The heterogeneity and limitations of the current findings and directions for future research on sex differences in romantic attachment are discussed

Anxiety · Attachment theory · Developmental psychology · Fertility · Meta-analysis · Population · Romance · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Demography · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Marriage and Sexual Relationships · Medicine · Psychology

  • Using attachment theory to conceptualize and measure the experiences in human-AI relationships

    Open Access•Fan Yang, Atsushi Oshio•Current Psychology•2025

  • The experiences in close relationship and internet addiction among college Students

    Open Access•Yuan Luo, Yuqian Deng et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2025

  • Different effects of attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance on depressive symptoms

    Open Access•Leying Zheng, Yadan Luo et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2020

  • Different effects of anxiety and avoidance dimensions of attachment on interpersonal trust

    Open Access•Xiuqin Bao, Song Li et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2022

  • Sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese

    Open Access•Dongju Li, Cong Shu et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2019

  • Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis

    Open Access•Hannah Rothstein, Alex J Sutton et al.•Publication bias in meta-analysis•2005

  • Introduction to Meta‐Analysis

    Open Access•Michael Borenstein, Larry V Hedges et al.•Introduction to Meta-Analysis•2009

  • Sex Differences in Romantic Attachment

    Open Access•Marco Del Giudice•Personality and Social Psychology…•2011

  • Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies

    Open Access•Marco Del Giudice•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2009

  • How to Estimate and Interpret Various Effect Sizes.

    Tammi Vacha-Haase, Tammi Vacha‐haase et al.•Journal of Counseling Psychology•2004

  • Childhood Experience, Interpersonal Development, and Reproductive Strategy

    J Belsky, Laurence Steinberg et al.•Child Development•1991

  • Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

    Open Access•Matthias Egger, Gregory D Smith et al.•BMJ•1997

  • Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment

    GEORGE W REVER•Psychosomatic Medicine•1972

  • From the Cradle to the Grave

    Open Access•W J Chopik, Robin S Edelstein et al.•Journal of Personality•2013

  • Are men universally more dismissing than women? Gender differences in romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions

    Open Access•D P Schmitt•Personal Relationships•2003

  • A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007

    Jennifer L Petersen, Janet Shibley Hyde•Psychological Bulletin•2010

  • Evolutionary Perspectives on Romantic Attachment and Culture

    Open Access•D P Schmitt•Cross-Cultural Research•2008

  • Death, Hope, and Sex

    J S Chisholm, Peter M Elias et al.•Current Anthropology•1993

  • Why does attachment style change

    Joanne Davila, Dorli Burge et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1997

  • Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process

    Cindy Hazan, P R Shaver et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1987

  • Sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese

    Open Access•Dongju Li, Cong Shu et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2019

  • On the Use of College Students in Social Science Research

    Robert A Peterson•Journal of Consumer Research•2001

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,71
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae