Sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese
A meta-analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2917080 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dongju Li (0000-0001-8682-8025, Southwest University), Cong Shu (Southwest University), Xu Chen (0000-0002-8164-3088, Southwest University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 2652-2676 |
| Publication date | 2019-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0265-4075 • E-ISSN: 1460-3608 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0265407518793533 |
| OpenAlex | W2890073764 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 31 |
Although several studies support evolutionary perspectives on sex differences in romantic attachment, these sex differences in East Asia remain controversial. To estimate the effect size of sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese adults, a meta-analysis of sex differences was conducted in the present study. This meta-analysis was based on 111 samples using the Chinese version of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale and its revised version. The findings suggest that the effect size of sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese adults is relatively small. Overall, females demonstrated higher anxiety and avoidance than males, with substantial between-study heterogeneity. Sex differences were largest in community samples, with higher avoidance and lower anxiety in males. There were smaller sex differences in college student samples, with higher anxiety and avoidance in females. The degree of sex differences also varied across geographical regions, with high-stress and high-fertility reproductive environments showing smaller sex differences in general and larger sex differences in extreme conditions. Sex differences in anxiety increased linearly with age, whereas those in avoidance remained unchanged. The results support evolutionary perspectives of sex differences in romantic attachment, which assume that the average sex differences in romantic attachment styles should be relatively small in most populations, and many possible factors might moderate such differences. The heterogeneity and limitations of the current findings and directions for future research on sex differences in romantic attachment are discussed
Anxiety · Attachment theory · Developmental psychology · Fertility · Meta-analysis · Population · Romance · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Demography · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Marriage and Sexual Relationships · Medicine · Psychology
Using attachment theory to conceptualize and measure the experiences in human-AI relationships
The experiences in close relationship and internet addiction among college Students
Different effects of attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance on depressive symptoms
Different effects of anxiety and avoidance dimensions of attachment on interpersonal trust
Sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese
Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis
Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
Sex Differences in Romantic Attachment
Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies
How to Estimate and Interpret Various Effect Sizes.
Childhood Experience, Interpersonal Development, and Reproductive Strategy
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment
From the Cradle to the Grave
Are men universally more dismissing than women? Gender differences in romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions
A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007
Evolutionary Perspectives on Romantic Attachment and Culture
Death, Hope, and Sex
Why does attachment style change
Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process
Sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese
On the Use of College Students in Social Science Research
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,71 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2025 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |