The multidimensional evaluation of enacted social support
Best practices for use based on issues of factor structure, study design, and scale instructions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2924834 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Colter D Ray (0000-0003-0491-1517, Louisiana State University, corresponding author), Alan C Mikkelson (0000-0003-4076-8412, Whitworth University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 3269-3295 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0265-4075 • E-ISSN: 1460-3608 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/02654075231171621 |
| OpenAlex | W4372198644 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 32 |
The Multidimensional Evaluation of Enacted Social Support (MEESS) measures communicated support in terms of supportiveness, helpfulness, and sensitivity. However, a systematic review of studies using the scale showed that the scale is mostly used as a unidimensional measure of support. Additionally, the scale is prone to having high interfactor correlations, and researchers rarely perform a confirmatory factor analysis to verify the scale's factor structure. Therefore, we conducted two studies (Combined N = 1609) using nationally representative samples of U.S. adults to investigate the scale's factor structure in message recall and hypothetical message study designs. We also explored whether the scale is best presented one factor at a time with factor-specific instructions as opposed to presenting the scale as a single set of items with one instruction set. Study 1 results indicate that the one-factor and three-factor solutions are both adequate without performing modifications during confirmatory factor analysis, but the three-factor model did provide a small but significantly better fit to the data than the one-factor model. In Study 2, both the one- and three-factor solutions had adequate fit; however, when using the factor-specific instructions, the three-factor solution had a far superior fit compared to the one-factor solution. Given the purpose of the scale as a multidimensional evaluation of social support, we recommend always conducting a confirmatory factor analysis when using the MEESS and to present the scale with separate instructions for each factor's items
Confirmatory factor analysis · Developmental psychology · Exploratory factor analysis · Factor (programming language · Factor analysis · Helpfulness · Machine learning · Psychometrics · Scale (ratio · Set (abstract data type · Structural equation modeling · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Computer Science · Psychology · Social Psychology
Emotion And Adaptation
CommSoWeird
Social support, social integration, and inflammatory cytokines
Insufficient effort responding
Factors Defined by Negatively Keyed Items
Careless Responding to Reverse-Worded Items
Why Is It Difficult for Social Network Members to Support People Living with Mental Illnesses
Mixed Messages
Methods of Detecting Insufficient Effort Responding
Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys
Chronemic Cues and Sex Differences in Relational E-Mail
Testing a Mediational Model of Bullied Victims' Evaluation of Received Support and Post-Bullying Adaptation
Effects of Helper and Recipient Sex on the Experience and Outcomes of Comforting Messages
Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventories
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
College sophomores in the laboratory
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research
Helpful, Supportive and Sensitive
The multidimensional evaluation of enacted social support
On the Use of College Students in Social Science Research
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2024 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |