Good characters and homology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2974877 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bernhard Wiesem Ller, Bernhard Wiesem�ller, H Rothe (0000-0003-1163-6576), Winfried Henke |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 151-152 |
| Publication date | 2000-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1060-1538 • E-ISSN: 1520-6505 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/1520-6505(2000)9:4<151::aid-evan2>3.0.co;2-l |
| OpenAlex | W2002874728 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 7 |
This paper is a critical comment on a recent article by Lieberman.1 We question his opinion that DNA is a better data source for phylogenetic reconstructions than bone and discuss his "problems and potential solutions" regarding the homology concept. We conclude that phylogenetic systematics requires a phylogenetic homology concept, and that Lieberman's "solutions," though useful terms, should not be designated as homology
Base sequence · Biology · DNA · Evolutionary biology · Gene · Homology (biology · Phylogenetic tree · Phylogenetics · Sequence homology · Systematics · Taxonomy (biology · Zoology · Evolution and Paleontology Studies · Genetic diversity and population structure · Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics · Genetics
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2000 - 2003 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |