Direct Instruction in very remote schools
A rejoinder to Guenther and Osborne (2020)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3008716 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jennifer Buckingham (0000-0002-0477-6469, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 171-172 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1326-0111 • E-ISSN: 2049-7784 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/jie.2020.18 |
| OpenAlex | W3085754368 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 3 |
In an article published in this journal, Guenther and Osborne (2020) use data from the reading test of the National Assessment Program for Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) to evaluate the effectiveness of the Flexible Literacy for Remote Primary Schools program in its first 3 years of implementation. However, their analysis has some serious flaws, including that the 'post-intervention' data were actually collected from the start of the implementation period. This calls their conclusions that the program was ineffective into question
Library science · Literacy · Mathematics education · Medical education · Numeracy · Pedagogy · Political science · Project commissioning · Publishing · Sociology · Computer Science · Education Systems and Policy · Indigenous and Place-Based Education · Medicine · Parental Involvement in Education · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |