Import and Impacts of the ECHR and the Judgments of the ECtHR in the Russian and German Legal System
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3009501 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hans‐georg Dederer (0000-0001-6024-8727, University of Passau, corresponding author), Hans-Georg Dederer |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 781-784 |
| Publication date | 2017-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Siberian Federal University Humanities & Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1997-1370 • E-ISSN: 2313-6014 |
| Publisher | Siberian Federal University (PUBLISHER • RU) |
| DOI | 10.17516/1997-1370-0084 |
| OpenAlex | W2733381062 |
| Language | EN |
In modern constitution-based states, it is, as a rule, the national constitution which determines whether, and to what extent, public international law takes effect in the domestic legal sphere. Accordingly, states may limit or even exclude the validity or applicability of public international law for constitutional reasons. This holds true for the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the judgements of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) as well. The jurisprudence of both the Russian and the German Constitutional Court provides examples of judicial approaches to limit the validity and applicability of the ECHR or ECtHR judgments within the national legal order
German · Linguistics · Political science · European and International Law Studies · Law · Philosophy · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|