Articulating secession
Self-determination, decolonization and stateless independence amongst the Kanaka Maoli
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3010504 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alexander Keller Hirsch (0000-0003-2450-4118, University of Alaska Fairbanks, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 102-116 |
| Publication date | 2015-03-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Identities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1350-4630 • E-ISSN: 1363-0296 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13504630.2015.1035491 |
| OpenAlex | W1502441164 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 33 |
Two assumptions reign supreme in the secession literature. The first is that separatist groups seeking autonomy necessarily fall into one of two camps, one that stresses essentialist criteria for social membership, the other emphasizing instead a socially constructed collective identity. The second assumption is that secession can only be defined as taking place in the context of a separatist group whose claim to independence hinges on the attempt to galvanize a new state. This article challenges both assumptions by looking to a provocative counter-site. Amongst the Kanaka Maoli of Hawai'i secession is increasingly framed precisely as a rejection of those Western idioms that have historically undergirded colonial expropriation and racial subjection. As such, secession is being framed not as a struggle for new statehood, but rather as a reinvigoration of indigenous lifeworlds. In so doing, the Kanaka Maoli are asserting community boundaries in ways that contest the idea that indigenous identity is solely about biological criteria such as blood quantum, but also challenge the notion that indigenous self-determination can be reduced to postmodern identity politics. The argument I defend suggests that articulation theory can offer us orienting power in situating some of the stakes of Kanaka Maoli stateless secession. Articulation theory expresses the idea that identities are volatile collective self-assertions that take place at discrepant scales of interactive exchange. This article argues that we can detect some important emergent practices of articulation at play in the Kanaka Maoli's experimental revisioning of what secession can mean today
Aesthetics · Collective identity · Indigenous · Political science · Politics · Secession · Self-determination · Sociology · Sovereignty · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Asian American and Pacific Histories · Gender Studies · Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights · Law · Philosophy
Indigenous Peoples In International Law
We Are the Ocean
Settler States of Feeling
Liver Bacterial Colonization in Patients with Obesity and Gut Dysbiosis
Subculture
Aversive Democracy
At the Edge of the State
Dismembering Lahui
“Indigenous Peoples” in International Law
Stuart Hall
Autonomy and Interdependence in Native Movements
Indigenous Sovereignty and the Democratic Project
Islands of History
Hawaiian Blood
Seeing Like a State
Like So Many Antigones”
On Postmodernism and Articulation
Colonialism in Equality
Methods and Nations
Indigenous Articulations
Islands of History
Articulating secession
The State and Indigenous Movements
From a Native Daughter
The Politics of Blood and Sovereignty in Rice v. Cayetano
Seeing Like a StateHow Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
Articulating Indigenous Identity in Indonesia
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,09 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2015 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |