Contextual Non-Consent
Notes From a "Failed" Interview Study with LGBTQ+ Youth in State Care
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3029487 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Catrine Andersson (0000-0001-7445-1013), Charlotta Carlström (0000-0003-1520-9838), Anna Arvidsson (0000-0003-0811-9922), Malin Lindroth (0000-0002-5637-5106) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Qualitative Methods (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1609-4069 • E-ISSN: 1609-4069 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/16094069251375177 |
| OpenAlex | W4413807962 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 34 |
This article explores the ethical complexities encountered during a research project, where one sub-study aimed at interviewing LGBTQ+ youth in state care. Using a theoretical framework of ethics of care and the concept of consent, we discuss our difficulties finding interviewees and our decision to stop recruiting because of ethical considerations. We aim to show: (1) How different forms of care were expressed during the fieldwork process, and (2) How care practices and non-actions during this process constituted a contextual non-consent. We analyze the ethical dimensions of the fieldwork process and argue that this was an example of how a contextual non-consent was developed, based on lack of response from youth, gatekeepers' hesitations, the signals we received from allied professionals within NGOs acting as gate-keepers and the professionals in care facilities we interviewed, together with our own mitigations of the risks of contacting youth in facilities where we reached the conclusion that not conducting a certain study will sometimes be the most ethical way of doing research with a vulnerable groups. The study highlights the importance of continuous ethical reflection and the potential need to abandon research plans to protect vulnerable groups. The findings underscore the ethical responsibility of researchers to prioritize the well-being of participants over the pursuit of data, especially when dealing with marginalized populations. This case study contributes to the broader discourse on ethical research practices and the nuanced understanding of consent in qualitative research
Alternative medicine · Informed consent · Psychoanalysis · Queer · Sociology · State (computer science · African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues · Computer Science · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Medicine · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Gender Studies
Black Feminist Thought
Confronting the Ethics of Qualitative Research
What is known about the LGBTQ perspective in child welfare services
LGBTQ Youth in the Child Welfare System
On the Outskirts of the Charmed Circle—Challenges and Limitations of Sexual Health Promotion to Young People in Secure State Care
The Good Qualitative Researcher
Sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) among young people in secure state care and their non-incarcerated peers – a qualitative, descriptive and comparative study
Critical ethical reflexivity (CER) in feminist narrative inquiry
Towards a Culture of Care and Consent
Judging the ethics of qualitative research
Hermeneutical Dissent and the Species of Hermeneutical Injustice
Bureaucracies of Mass Deception
Residential Social Care Experiences of LGBTQ+ Young People in England
Embedding Reflexivity in Social Work Research through the Critical Reflexive Framework
Afterword
Contextual Non-Consent
Researchers With Benefits? Methodological and Ethical Challenges and Possibilities in Sexuality Research Within Marginalised Populations
Why do people participate in research interviews? Participant orientations and ethical contracts in interviews with victims of interpersonal violence
Implementing continuous consent in qualitative research
Harm, change and unpredictability
Negotiating the swamp
Consenting to the Consent Form
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |