Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The gaming of citation and authorship in academic journals

A Warning From Medicine

Bibliographic Data

ID3055451
AuthorsStuart Macdonald (0000-0003-0939-1602, University of Leicester, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume61
Issue4
Pages457-480
Publication date2022-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science Information (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0539-0184 • E-ISSN: 1461-7412
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/05390184221142218
OpenAlexW4319602732
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited115

The use of quantitative performance indicators to measure quality in academic publishing has undercut peer review's qualitative assessment of articles submitted to journals. The two might have co-existed quite amicably were the most common indicator, citation, on which the journal impact factor is based, not been so susceptible to gaming. Gaming of citations is ubiquitous in academic publishing and referees are powerless to prevent it. The article gives some indication of how the citation game is played. It then moves on from academic publishing in general to look at academic publishing in medicine, a discipline in which authorship is also gamed. Many authors in medicine have made no meaningful contribution to the article that bears their names, and those who have contributed most are often not named as authors. Author slots are openly bought and sold. The problem is magnified by the academic publishing industry and by academic institutions, pleased to pretend that peer review is safeguarding scholarship. In complete contrast, the editors of medicine's leading journals are scathing about just how ineffectual is peer review in medicine. Other disciplines should take note lest they fall into the mire in which medicine is sinking

Academic medicine · Citation · Impact factor · Medical education · Political science · Public relations · Publishing · Safeguarding · Scholarship · Health and Medical Research Impacts · Law · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • What Factors Inform Decisions about Where to Submit High-Quality Scholarship? A National Sample of Social Work Faculty Share Their Perspectives

    Open Access•David R Hodges, David R Hodge et al.•Social Work Research•2025

  • Turning a blind eye to the reality of academic publishing

    Open Access•Stuart Macdonald•Social Science Information•2026

  • Beyond the Box

    Open Access•Fernando Santos, Alex Lascu et al.•Quest•2026

  • Making the impact of publications within a field comparable by improving the field-weighted citation impact (FWCI)

    Open Access•Nicolas Scelles, Jaime A Teixeira Da Silva•Scientometrics•2025

  • The complex ecosystem of hyperprolific authors

    Open Access•Jussara M Almeida, Alessia Antelmi et al.•Scientometrics•2026

  • An Autoethnographic Perspective on Scholarly Impact, Citation Politics, and North–South Power Dynamics

    Open Access•Suleman Lazaru•Life Writing•2024

  • Equipping Social Work Faculty to Document Scholarly Impact

    Open Access•David R Hodges, Arianna Weide et al.•Research on Social Work Practice•2026

  • The health-physical activity entanglement in a neoliberal landscape

    Open Access•F Santos, D Malcolm et al.•Critical Public Health•2025

  • Infusing ‘post’ thinking in qualitative training using material-performative pedagogies

    Martin Camiré•Qualitative Research in Sport and…•2025

  • Governing Science through Evaluation

    Open Access•Meta Cramer, Martin Reinhart et al.•Minerva•2026

  • The gaming of citation and authorship in academic journals

    Open Access•Stuart Macdonald•Social Science Information•2022

  • Competitization

    Open Access•Georg Wolfmayr•Journal of Cultural Economy•2024

  • Characteristics of highly cited papers

    Dag W Aksnes•Research Evaluation•2003

  • Bias in peer review

    Open Access•Carole J Lee, Cassidy R Sugimoto et al.•Journal of the Association for…•2013

  • A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines

    Open Access•Ana Marušić, Lana Bošnjak et al.•PLoS ONE•2011

  • Publish or impoverish

    Open Access•Wei Quan, Bikun Chen et al.•Aslib Journal of Information…•2017

  • ‘Predatory’ open access

    Open Access•Cenyu Shen, Bo‐Christer Björk et al.•BMC Medicine•2015

  • The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor

    Eugene Garfield•JAMA•2006

  • The natural selection of bad science

    Open Access•P E Smaldino, Richard Mcelreath•Royal Society Open Science•2016

  • How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

    Open Access•Daniele Fanelli, Tom Tregenza•PLoS ONE•2009

  • Can the quality of published academic journal articles be assessed with machine learning

    Open Access•Mike Thelwall•Quantitative Science Studies•2022

  • Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship

    Open Access•Hugh Willmott•Organization•2011

  • Pharma Goes to the Laundry

    Carl Elliott•The Hastings Center Report•2004

  • Publisher, be damned! From price gouging to the open road

    Open Access•David Harvie, Geoff Lightfoot et al.•Prometheus•2013

  • Dishonest conformity in peer review

    Open Access•Sotaro Shibayama, Yasunori Baba•Prometheus•2015

  • Playing the citations game

    Open Access•Neal M Ashkanasy•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2007

  • Pharmaceutical Maneuvers

    Open Access•Sergio Sismondo•Social Studies of Science•2004

  • Shaping the Intimate

    Open Access•David Healy•Social Studies of Science•2004

  • Changing publication practices and the typification of the journal article in science and technology studies

    Open Access•Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, K Birch et al.•Social Studies of Science•2022

  • Ghosts, brands, and influencers

    Open Access•Mario Biagioli•Social Studies of Science•2022

  • The changing functions of citation

    Nicholas C Burbules•Paedagogica Historica•2015

  • Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Alexander D Rushforth, Sarah De Rijcke•Minerva•2015

  • The intended consequences of Robert K. Merton

    Open Access•Eugene Garfield•Scientometrics•2004

  • How Are the Mighty Fallen

    Open Access•Joshua S Gans, George B Shepherd•The Journal of Economic…•1994

  • Stop evaluating science

    Open Access•Olof Hallonsten•Social Science Information•2021

  • The gaming of citation and authorship in academic journals

    Open Access•Stuart Macdonald•Social Science Information•2022

  • Revising as Reframing

    Open Access•David Strang, Kyle Siler•Sociological Theory•2015

Unique citing works12
Citations per year3
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae