The gaming of citation and authorship in academic journals
A Warning From Medicine
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3055451 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stuart Macdonald (0000-0003-0939-1602, University of Leicester, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 457-480 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Science Information (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0539-0184 • E-ISSN: 1461-7412 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/05390184221142218 |
| OpenAlex | W4319602732 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 115 |
The use of quantitative performance indicators to measure quality in academic publishing has undercut peer review's qualitative assessment of articles submitted to journals. The two might have co-existed quite amicably were the most common indicator, citation, on which the journal impact factor is based, not been so susceptible to gaming. Gaming of citations is ubiquitous in academic publishing and referees are powerless to prevent it. The article gives some indication of how the citation game is played. It then moves on from academic publishing in general to look at academic publishing in medicine, a discipline in which authorship is also gamed. Many authors in medicine have made no meaningful contribution to the article that bears their names, and those who have contributed most are often not named as authors. Author slots are openly bought and sold. The problem is magnified by the academic publishing industry and by academic institutions, pleased to pretend that peer review is safeguarding scholarship. In complete contrast, the editors of medicine's leading journals are scathing about just how ineffectual is peer review in medicine. Other disciplines should take note lest they fall into the mire in which medicine is sinking
Academic medicine · Citation · Impact factor · Medical education · Political science · Public relations · Publishing · Safeguarding · Scholarship · Health and Medical Research Impacts · Law · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
What Factors Inform Decisions about Where to Submit High-Quality Scholarship? A National Sample of Social Work Faculty Share Their Perspectives
Turning a blind eye to the reality of academic publishing
Beyond the Box
Making the impact of publications within a field comparable by improving the field-weighted citation impact (FWCI)
The complex ecosystem of hyperprolific authors
An Autoethnographic Perspective on Scholarly Impact, Citation Politics, and North–South Power Dynamics
Equipping Social Work Faculty to Document Scholarly Impact
The health-physical activity entanglement in a neoliberal landscape
Infusing ‘post’ thinking in qualitative training using material-performative pedagogies
Governing Science through Evaluation
The gaming of citation and authorship in academic journals
Competitization
Characteristics of highly cited papers
Bias in peer review
A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines
Publish or impoverish
‘Predatory’ open access
The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor
The natural selection of bad science
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
Can the quality of published academic journal articles be assessed with machine learning
Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship
Pharma Goes to the Laundry
Publisher, be damned! From price gouging to the open road
Dishonest conformity in peer review
Playing the citations game
Pharmaceutical Maneuvers
Shaping the Intimate
Changing publication practices and the typification of the journal article in science and technology studies
Ghosts, brands, and influencers
The changing functions of citation
Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands
The intended consequences of Robert K. Merton
How Are the Mighty Fallen
Stop evaluating science
The gaming of citation and authorship in academic journals
Revising as Reframing
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |