Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Neither the Purse Nor the Sword

Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court

Bibliographic Data

ID3138458
AuthorsGregory A Caldeira (The Ohio State University, corresponding author)
Year1986
Volume80
Issue4
Pages1209-1226
Publication date1986-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1960864
OpenAlexW4231865642
LanguageEN
Citations received57
References cited34

Systematic study of changes in support for the U.S. Supreme Court across time has not been undertaken. Armed with a time series of observations from 1966 through 1984, I provide a description of the ebb and flow of public esteem for the Court. Then I outline and test several plausible propositions about the dynamics of support. Statistical analyses compel the conclusion that apart from a relatively constant core of support, increases in judicial activism, inflation, and solicitude for the rights of the accused decreased confidence in the Court; the events surrounding Watergate and increases in presidential popularity and the public salience of the Court brought about increased popular esteem for the high bench. Previous scholars, based on cross-sections of individuals, have emphasized the public's ignorance of and disinterest in the Supreme Court and judicial policy making. The responsiveness of public support for the Court in the aggregate to political events and shifts in the behavior of the justices stands in stark contrast to the conventional image of United States citizenry as singularly out of touch with and unmoved by the Supreme Court

Concurring opinion · Court of record · Dissenting opinion · Majority opinion · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Popularity · Salience (neuroscience · State supreme court · Supreme court · Supreme Court Decisions · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Psychology

  • Reducing courts' failure-to-appear rate by written reminders

    Brian H Bornstein, Alan J Tomkins et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2013

  • Citizens and the State

    Jacques Thomassen, Hans-Dieter Klingemann et al.•Citizens and the State (Beliefs…•1998

  • Intermediate Organizations and Interest Representation

    Kees Aarts•Citizens and the State (Beliefs…•1998

  • Trust and tribulation

    Open Access•Benjamin T Blankenship, Tangier M Davis et al.•Analyses of Social Issues and…•2021

  • Black representation and the popular legitimacy of the Federal Reserve

    Open Access•Daniel Mcdowell, David A Steinberg•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • Measuring the Countermajoritarian Nature of Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Eugenia Artabe, Alex Badas•The Journal of Legal Studies•2023

  • Trust in the courts of Hong Kong

    Open Access•Shen Yang, Zhiyuan Ding•Journal of Asian and African…•2026

  • The Impact of Oral Argument Attendance

    Open Access•Damon Cann, Greg Goelzhauser•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • Second-Order Evaluations of the European Court of Human Rights

    Open Access•Linda Camp Keith, Banks Miller et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2015

  • Lower Courts in Interbranch Conflict

    Open Access•Joshua A Strayhorn•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • Constitutional Recency and Support for Judicial Review

    Open Access•Adam R Brown, Christopher Krewson•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • In the Light

    Open Access•Taraleigh Davis•American Politics Research•2024

  • The courts/parliament trade-off

    Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth Goodyear‐grant et al.•Commonwealth and Comparative…•2013

  • Courts as hegemonic institutions

    Gad Barzilai•Israel Affairs•1998

  • Russians and the legal system

    William M Reisinger, Arthur H Miller et al.•Journal of Communist Studies•1997

  • Media Coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Kaitlyn L Sill, Emily T Metzgar et al.•Political Communication•2013

  • Mutual Bonds

    Open Access•Bryna Bogoch, Yifat Holzman‐Gazit et al.•Law & Social Inquiry•2008

  • Measuring constitutional loyalty

    Open Access•Jerg Gutmann, Roee Sarel et al.•Public Choice•2025

  • Testing racial and ethnic differences in the correlates of court legitimacy

    Open Access•Chae M Jaynes, Jeong-Gyeong Lee et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2024

  • Sentencing policy and disparity

    Open Access•Matthew S Crow, Marc Gertz•Journal of Criminal Justice•2008

  • Citizen assessment of local criminal courts

    Open Access•Kevin Buckler, Francis T Cullen et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2007

  • The unintended consequences of increased access to justice

    Open Access•Whitney K Taylor•Law & Society Review•2025

  • The U.S. Supreme Court's Incorporation and Interpretation of Precedent

    Open Access•James F Spriggs, Thomas G Hansford•Law & Society Review•2002

  • Compensation and Compliance

    Open Access•Ezequiel González-Ocantos, Elias Dinas•Law & Society Review•2019

  • Latin American Courts Going Public

    Open Access•Cordula Tibi Weber•Revista de ciencia política•2024

  • Naming Names

    Open Access•Scott S Boddery, Laura P Moyer et al.•Law & Society Review•2019

  • The Verdict is in

    Open Access•Mary Fran Fran T Malone•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2010

  • Confidence in the Judiciary

    Marc Bühlmann, Ruth Kunz•West European Politics•2011

  • Confidence in Institutions Before, During, and After “Indecision 2000

    Vincent Price, Anca Romantan•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • An Appeal to the People

    Joseph Daniel Ura, Patrick C Wohlfarth•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion

    Valerie J Hoekstra, Jeffrey A Segal•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • Federal District Judges and Presidential Power During the Postwar Era

    Craig R Ducat, Robert L Dudley•The Journal of Politics•1989

  • Framing Support for the Supreme Court in the Aftermath of Bush v. Gore

    Stephen P Nicholson, Robert M Howard•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Jeffery J Mondak, Shannon Ishiyama Smithey•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Sensationalism and Sobriety Differential Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward American Courts

    Chris Johnston, C D Johnston et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  • The Supreme Court, Factions, and the Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty

    Open Access•Dave Bridge•Polity•2015

  • Extra-judicial Actor Induced Change in Supreme Court Legitimacy

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Do Policy Messengers Matter? Majority Opinion Writers as Policy Cues in Public Agreement with Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Scott S Boddery, Jeff Yates•Political Research Quarterly•2014

  • Media Attention and Deliberation on the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Billy Justus•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Ideology and Specific Support for the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kathryn Haglin, Soren Jordan et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Ideological Proximity and Support for The Supreme Court

    Open Access•N Malhotra, Steve Jessee et al.•Political Behavior•2014

  • Inter-Institutional Dynamics

    Open Access•Kjersten R Nelson, Kjersten Nelson et al.•Political Behavior•2013

  • Judicial Behavior and Public Opinion

    Open Access•John M Scheb, William Lyons•Political Behavior•2001

  • Public Trust in Latin America's Courts

    Open Access•David De Micheli, Whitney K Taylor•Government and Opposition•2024

  • Differential public support and the independence of anti-corruption agencies

    Open Access•Jian Xu, Jing Xu•European Political Science Review•2024

  • Public confidence in the judiciary

    Aylin Aydin-Cakir, Aylin Aydın Çakır et al.•Democratization•2016

  • The Supreme Court at the Bar of Public Opinion Polls

    Open Access•Or Bassok•Constellations•2016

  • Why People Turn to Institutions They Detest

    Open Access•Lisa Hilbink, Valentina Salas et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2022

  • Regimes and the Rule of Law

    Gretchen Helmke, Frances Mccall Rosenbluth et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2009

  • Reassessing the Institutional Legitimacy of the South African Constitutional Court

    James L Gibson•Politikon•2016

  • Supreme Court Oral Arguments and Institutional Maintenance

    Open Access•Eve M Ringsmuth, Timothy R Johnson•American Politics Research•2013

  • Judicial self fashioning

    Open Access•Rosamond Elizabeth Thalken, David Mimno et al.•Discourse Studies•2024

  • Judicial Independence across Democratic Regimes

    Open Access•Aylin Aydın, Aylin Aydin-Cakir•Law & Society Review•2013

  • Between impartiality and politicization

    Open Access•Eileen Böhringer, Christophe Boucher•Electoral Studies•2024

  • The Politics of Punishment and the Siege of Sarajevo

    Open Access•Sanja Kutnjak Ivković, J Hagan•Law & Society Review•2006

  • Faith in the Court

    Open Access•Andre P Audette, Christopher L Weaver•Law & Society Review•2015

  • The Influence of Public Sentiment on Supreme Court Opinion Clarity

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Ryan J Owens et al.•Law & Society Review•2016

  • The confidence gap

    Seymour Martin Lipset•The confidence gap•1983

  • The New American Political System

    Open Access•Anthony King•The New American Political System•1990

  • Supreme Court Activism and Restraint

    Open Access•Dagmar Hamilton, Stephen C Halpern et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1983

  • Representatives and Represented

    Paul Burstein, Samuel C Patterson et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1978

  • Press Coverage of the United States Supreme Court

    Open Access•Chester A Newland•The Western Political Quarterly•1964

  • The Supreme Court in the American System of Government

    James F Crafts, Robert H Jackson et al.•Stanford Law Review•1955

  • Explaining Presidential Popularity

    Open Access•Samuel Kernell•American Political Science Review•1978

  • Patterns of Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Joseph Tanenhaus, Walter F Murphy•The Journal of Politics•1981

  • The Supreme Court and Public Opinion

    David G Barnum•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • The Political Party Basis of Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court

    Kenneth M Dolbeare, Phillip E Hammond•Public Opinion Quarterly•1968

  • Public Opinion and Supreme Court

    Walter F Murphy, Joseph Tanenhaus•Public Opinion Quarterly•1968

  • Why Do Americans Love Their Congressmen so Much More than Their Congress

    Open Access•Glenn R Parker, Roger H Davidson et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1979

  • Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential Popularity

    Michael B Mackuen, Michael Mackuen•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • The Theory of Presidential Association

    Gregory Casey, Gregory P Casey•American Journal of Political…•1975

  • Some Themes in Congressional Unpopularity

    Glenn R Parker•American Journal of Political…•1977

  • The Constitution as Symbol

    Larry R Baas•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • The Impact of Judicial Activism on Public Opinion

    Richard Lehne, John Reynolds•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • Trends in Public Support for the American Party System

    Open Access•Jack Dennis•British Journal of Political…•1975

  • The United States Supreme Court and Criminal Cases, 1935–1976

    Open Access•Gregory A Caldeira•British Journal of Political…•1981

  • Support for the Supreme Court as a National Policymaker

    Open Access•David Adamany, Joel B Grossman•Law & Policy•1983

  • Children's Images of the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Greg A Caldeira•Law & Society Review•1977

  • Rejoinder to "Comment" by Jack Citrin

    Open Access•Arthur H Miller•American Political Science Review•1974

  • The Supreme Court and Myth

    Open Access•Gregory Casey•Law & Society Review•1974

  • Lawyers Judge the Warren Court

    Open Access•Edward N Beiser•Law & Society Review•1972

  • Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court

    Open Access•Walter F Murphy, Joseph Tanenhaus•Law & Society Review•1968

  • Support for the Party System by the Mass Public

    Open Access•Jack Dennis•American Political Science Review•1966

Unique citing works57
Citations per year1,54
Citation span1989 - 2026 (38)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 56

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae