Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court

Bibliographic Data

ID6385657
AuthorsJeffery J Mondak (0000-0002-5168-2326, Florida State University), Shannon Ishiyama Smithey (University of Pittsburgh)
Year1997
Volume59
Issue4
Pages1114-1142
Publication date1997-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3816 • E-ISSN: 1468-2508
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2307/2998595
OpenAlexW2075651173
LanguageEN
Citations received88
References cited31

Past empirical studies of factors affecting public support for the Supreme Court suggest: (1) the Supreme Court's decisions are more often congruent than incongruent with public opinion; (2) public response to decisions influences subsequent levels of institutional support; (3) negative reactions more strongly affect institutional support than do positive reactions; and (4) support is subject to value-based regeneration due to a link between the Court and basic democratic values. Although a wealth of empirical studies underlies these propositions, such findings appear inconsistent with the observed character of aggregate public support for the Court-namely, that levels of support tend to be high and that support is quite stable over time. To explore this tension, we construct a dynamic model of public support for the Supreme Court, guided by our four empirically derived propositions. Model analysis and estimation demonstrates that an active and occasionally controversial Supreme Court can maintain aggregate public support that is both high and stable

Construct (python library · Democracy · Economics · Empirical research · Majority opinion · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Public relations · Public support · Subject (documents · Supreme court · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies

  • Curbing the Court

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Christian D Johnston et al.•Curbing the Court•2020

  • The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany

    Open Access•Georg Vanberg•Politics of Constitutional Review…•2004

  • Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Valerie J Hoekstra•Public Reaction to Supreme Court…•2003

  • Amizade seletiva

    Open Access•Débora Costa Ferreira•Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea•2020

  • Translating the Constitution

    Jack M Balkin, Jack Balkin•Michigan Law Review•2020

  • Trust in Government and Public Support for Government Spending

    Yunsoo Lee•International Journal of Public…•2026

  • Lifetime Appointments, Lasting Reactions

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, Christopher Krewson et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • No Shelter in Unanimity

    Open Access•J Robison•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Framing Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Rosalee A Clawson, Harry C “neil” Strine et al.•Journal of Black Studies•2003

  • Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Logan Strother, Shana Kushner Gadarian•The Forum•2022

  • The Costs of Policy Legitimation

    Open Access•David Fontana, Christopher Krewson•Journal of Law and Courts•2022

  • Justice Speaks, but Who's Listening

    Open Access•Matthew P Hitt, Kyle L Saunders et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Second-Order Evaluations of the European Court of Human Rights

    Open Access•Linda Camp Keith, Banks Miller et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2015

  • Are legal values gendered? Gender differences in support for judicial independence in Hong Kong

    Open Access•Man Yee Karen Lee, Yan Lam Lo•International journal of law,…•2020

  • Beyond Judicialization

    Open Access•Christoph Hönnige•European Political Science•2010

  • The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Michael J Nelson•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2014

  • The Supreme Court and Congress

    Open Access•Maron W Sorenson•American Politics Research•2025

  • Constitutional courts and citizens’ perceptions of judicial systems in Europe

    Open Access•Rosa M Navarrete, Pablo José Castillo Ortiz et al.•Comparative European Politics•2019

  • The courts/parliament trade-off

    Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth Goodyear‐grant et al.•Commonwealth and Comparative…•2013

  • Trust in the (Measures of Legitimacy of) Courts

    Open Access•Rahul Hemrajani•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • The Partisan Foundations of Attitudes Towards State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Eugenia Artabe, Alex Badas et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Race and Allegiance to the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gibson Gibson•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Fed Up

    Open Access•Ian G Anson•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Institutional Structures and Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Michael J Nelson, James L Gibson•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Media Coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Kaitlyn L Sill, Emily T Metzgar et al.•Political Communication•2013

  • Cognitive Heuristics, Inter-Institutional Politics, and Public Perceptions of Insulated Institutions

    Open Access•Michael A Zilis•International Journal of Public…•2020

  • Are You Talking to Me? How Ideological and Gender Characteristics Moderate the Effect of Legitimizing Rhetoric on SCOTUS Legitimacy

    Open Access•Ryan J Williams, L Christiani•Law & Social Inquiry•2023

  • Rethinking Regime Politics

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • Frame Spillover

    Open Access•Stephen M Engel•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization

    Open Access•Ran Hirschl•Law & Social Inquiry•2000

  • The dynamics of specific and diffuse support for the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Rick A Swanson•The Social Science Journal•2007

  • Public confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•James W Stoutenborough, Donald P Haider-Markel•The Social Science Journal•2008

  • The Political Fallout of Taking a Stand

    Open Access•Donald P Haider-Markel, Donald P Haider‐markel et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Local support among arctic residents to a land tenure reform in Finnmark, Norway

    Open Access•Else Grete Broderstad, Byong‐Taek Lee et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Citizen assessment of local criminal courts

    Open Access•Kevin Buckler, Francis T Cullen et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2007

  • Actions, Factions, and Interactions

    Open Access•Tyler Johnson, Erica Socker et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2012

  • Judicial Decisions, Backlash and Secessionism

    Open Access•Agustín Casas, Federico Curci et al.•The Economic Journal•2024

  • Public Opinion & the Supreme Court

    Linda Greenhouse•Daedalus•2012

  • The U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy

    Open Access•James L Gibson•The Annals of the American…•2024

  • Political Orientation and Trust in the Courts

    Man Yee Karen Lee, Yan Lam Lo•Asian Survey•2023

  • The Legitimacy-conferring Authority of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Rosalee A Clawson, Elizabeth R Kegler et al.•American Politics Research•2001

  • Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? The Case of the U.S. Courts

    Nancy Scherer, Brett Curry•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Issue Preferences and Evaluations of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Marc J Hetherington, Joseph L Smith•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  • Procedural Perceptions and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Mark D Ramirez•Political Psychology•2008

  • Dynamic Estimation of Latent Opinion Using a Hierarchical Group-Level IRT Model

    Open Access•Devin Caughey, Carole Warshaw et al.•Political Analysis•2015

  • The Verdict is in

    Open Access•Mary Fran Fran T Malone•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2010

  • How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Christopher Casillas, Christopher J Casillas et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Is the U.S. Supreme Court's Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Michael J Nelson•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • The Public Consequences of Presidential Legitimacy Rhetoric

    Open Access•Stephanie Wise•Social Science Quarterly•2025

  • Confidence in Institutions Before, During, and After “Indecision 2000

    Vincent Price, Anca Romantan•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • The Stability and Durability of the US Supreme Court’s Legitimacy

    Michael J Nelson, Patrick D Tucker et al.•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Descriptive Legitimacy and International Organizations

    Wilfred M Chow, Enze Han•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • Framing Support for the Supreme Court in the Aftermath of Bush v. Gore

    Stephen P Nicholson, Robert M Howard•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Campaign Support, Conflicts of Interest, and Judicial Impartiality

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • Public Perceptions of State Court Impartiality and Court Legitimacy in an Era of Partisan Politics

    Open Access•Corey Barwick, Corey Michael Barwick et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2020

  • Change in Institutional Support for the US Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Michael J Nelson•Public Opinion Quarterly•2016

  • Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? The Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Anke Grosskopf, Jeffery J Mondak•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Reassessing the Supreme Court

    Open Access•D P Christenson, David M Glick•Political Research Quarterly•2019

  • How the Intensity of Preference for Ideological Judges Influences Court Support

    Open Access•Christopher Krewson, Ryan J Owens•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Explaining Public Confidence in the Branches of State Government

    Open Access•Christine A Kelleher, Jennifer Wolak•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Reassessing the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Opinion

    Open Access•James W Stoutenborough, Donald P Haider-Markel et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • Devolving Dobbs

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Michael J Nelson•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Shattering the Myth of Legality

    Open Access•Vanessa A Baird, Amy Gangl•Political Psychology•2006

  • Supreme Court Legitimacy and Group-Centric Forces

    Open Access•Rosalee A Clawson, Elizabeth R Kegler et al.•Political Behavior•2003

  • Partisan Divergence and Public Support for the Courts of Taiwan

    Open Access•Chung-Li Wu•Japanese Journal of Political…•2017

  • Differential public support and the independence of anti-corruption agencies

    Open Access•Jian Xu, Jing Xu•European Political Science Review•2024

  • Public confidence in the judiciary

    Aylin Aydin-Cakir, Aylin Aydın Çakır et al.•Democratization•2016

  • Strategic Legitimacy Cultivation at the Supreme Court of Canada

    Open Access•Vuk Radmilovic•Canadian Journal of Political…•2010

  • Thesupremecourt Inamericanpolitics

    Lawrence Baum•Annual Review of Political Science•2003

  • All the President's Justices? The Impact of Presidential Copartisanship on Supreme Court Job Approval

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Eric Kramon•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • Losing legitimacy

    Open Access•James L Gibson•American Journal of Political…•2024

  • Ideological Divergence and Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Robert H Durr, Robert Dürr et al.•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Tom S Clark•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Taking Time Seriously

    Open Access•Suzanna De Boef, Luke Keele•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Trust in the Judiciary and Partisan Reactions to Judicial Checks

    Open Access•Martín Gandur•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • Reassessing the Institutional Legitimacy of the South African Constitutional Court

    James L Gibson•Politikon•2016

  • An application of the integrated framework of legitimacy to the state courts context

    Joseph A Hamm•International Journal of…•2020

  • Policy, Politics, and Public Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Stephen D Ansolabehere et al.•American Politics Research•2020

  • After the Supreme Word

    Open Access•Michael A Unger•American Politics Research•2008

  • The Sources Of Public Confidence In State Courts

    Open Access•James P Wenzel, Shaun Bowler et al.•American Politics Research•2003

  • Evaluating the Effects of Multiple Opinion Rationales on Supreme Court Legitimacy

    Open Access•Chris W Bonneau, Jarrod T Kelly et al.•American Politics Research•2017

  • Source Cues and Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Tom S Clark, Jonathan P Kastellec•American Politics Research•2015

  • Faith in the Court

    Open Access•Andre P Audette, Christopher L Weaver•Law & Society Review•2015

  • On the Legitimacy of National High Courts

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion

    Open Access•Valerie J Hoekstra•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Do the Effects of Unpopular Supreme Court Rulings Linger? The Dobbs Decision Rescinding Abortion Rights

    Open Access•James L Gibson•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Group Identification and Support for the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Christopher D Kromphardt, Joseph L Smith et al.•Journal for the Scientific Study…•2019

  • Dynamic Modeling

    R Huckfeldt, C Kohfeld et al.•Dynamic Modeling•1982

  • On a measure of lack of fit in time series models

    Greta M Ljung, George E P Box•Biometrika•1978

  • Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak•American Politics Quarterly•1992

  • Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation

    John J Skowronski, Donal E Carlston•Psychological Bulletin•1989

  • Social judgment and social memory

    John J Skowronski, Donal E Carlston•Journal of Personality and Social…•1987

  • Attention and weight in person perception

    Susan T Fiske•Journal of Personality and Social…•1980

  • Republican Schoolmaster

    Open Access•Charles H Franklin, Liane Kosaki et al.•American Political Science Review•1989

  • Patterns of Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Joseph Tanenhaus, Walter F Murphy•The Journal of Politics•1981

  • The Supreme Court and Public Opinion

    David G Barnum•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Blacks and the United States Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Negativity in political perception

    Open Access•Richard R Lau•Political Behavior•1982

  • Perceived legitimacy of Supreme Court decisions

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak•Political Behavior•1990

  • The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Gregory A Caldeira, James L Gibson•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior

    Richard R Lau•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • The Constitution as Symbol

    Larry R Baas•American Journal of Political…•1979

  • Support for the Supreme Court as a National Policymaker

    Open Access•David Adamany, Joel B Grossman•Law & Policy•1983

  • The Supreme Court and Myth

    Open Access•Gregory Casey•Law & Society Review•1974

  • Understandings of Justice

    Open Access•James L Gibson•Law & Society Review•1989

  • The Supreme Court and Authority Acceptance

    Michael J Petrick, Michael J P Etrick et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1968

  • The Responsive Voter

    Open Access•Milton Lodge, Marco R Steenbergen et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • The Social Context of Political Change

    Open Access•R Robert Huckfeldt, Robert Huckfeldt•American Political Science Review•1983

  • The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•William Mishler, Reginald S Sheehan•American Political Science Review•1993

  • Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Helmut Norpoth, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Political Science Review•1994

  • Neither the Purse Nor the Sword

    Open Access•Gregory A Caldeira•American Political Science Review•1986

Unique citing works88
Citations per year3,14
Citation span1998 - 2026 (29)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 88

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae