Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

All the President's Justices? The Impact of Presidential Copartisanship on Supreme Court Job Approval

Bibliographic Data

ID6231897
AuthorsBrandon L Bartels (0000-0002-5144-4758, George Washington University), Eric Kramon (0000-0001-8299-4018, George Washington University)
Year2022
Volume66
Issue1
Pages171-186
Publication date2022-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ajps.12617
OpenAlexW3195331875
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited39

Supreme Court job approval is sensibly connected to its decisions, particularly salient ones. We fill a gap in the literature by theorizing—via a presidential appointment mechanism—how partisan alignment with the incumbent president (presidential copartisanship) influences Supreme Court job approval. Analysis of data from 1986 to 2019 (supplemented by longer‐term confidence data) shows that a president's copartisans are significantly more approving of the Court than outpartisans. Analysis of the American Panel Survey surrounding high‐salience events during the transition from Obama to Trump shows that Republicans, who significantly increase in Court approval following Trump's election victory, are anticipatory of Trump's prospects of changing the Court. Democrats, whose approval significantly declines only after Justice Gorsuch's confirmation, are not anticipatory but reactive to the president's confirmed appointee. Our findings generate new evidence of how the president structures public opinion toward the Court, which has important implications for judicial independence and legitimacy

Concurring opinion · Court of record · Judicial Independence · Legitimacy · Majority opinion · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Salience (neuroscience · Supreme court · Victory · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Psychology

  • Partisan Approval for the Supreme Court After Dobbs

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Eric Kramon•Public Opinion Quarterly•2026

  • Depictions of Partisan Bias at Oral Argument and Public Evaluations of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Joshua Boston, Christopher Krewson et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Lifetime Appointments, Lasting Reactions

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, Christopher Krewson et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Experiential Spillover in Public Views of Police and Courts

    Open Access•Emma L Henderson, Emma Henderson et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2026

  • From Politics to the Bench

    Open Access•Aiden Parker, J Barrett et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Institutional Structures and Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Michael J Nelson, James L Gibson•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • The Pivotal and Distributive Politics of Senate‐Confirmed Appointee Vacancies

    Open Access•William G Resh, Nicholas G Napolio et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Public Approval of the Supreme Court and Its Implications for Legitimacy

    Open Access•Joshua Boston, Christopher Krewson•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Judicial Philosophy and the Public’s Support for Courts

    Open Access•Christopher Krewson, Ryan J Owens•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • The Racialization of the United States Supreme Court? Examining Changes in Public Opinion Toward SCOTUS Over Time

    Open Access•K Shoub, Jamie S Scott et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • Consequences of Corruption for Political System Support

    Open Access•David De Micheli, Whitney K Taylor•Comparative Political Studies•2025

  • The Soldier in the State

    Open Access•Pedro Accorsi, Ronald R Krebs•Comparative Political Studies•2025

  • Losing legitimacy

    Open Access•James L Gibson•American Journal of Political…•2024

  • Trust in the Judiciary and Partisan Reactions to Judicial Checks

    Open Access•Martín Gandur•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • The Rule of Law in Red and Blue

    Open Access•Ali S Masood, Ryan Strickler et al.•American Politics Research•2024

  • The Gender Gap in Supreme Court Legitimacy

    Open Access•Christopher Krewson, Jean Reith Schroedel•American Politics Research•2023

  • Your Honor’s Misdeeds

    Open Access•Joshua Boston, Benjamin J Kassow et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2023

  • Curbing the Court

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Christian D Johnston et al.•Curbing the Court•2020

  • Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations•2009

  • Tides of Consent

    Open Access•James A Stimson•Tides of Consent•2004

  • Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Valerie J Hoekstra•Public Reaction to Supreme Court…•2003

  • A systems analysis of political life

    David Easton•A systems analysis of political…•1979

  • The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Michael J Nelson•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2014

  • Cognitive Heuristics, Inter-Institutional Politics, and Public Perceptions of Insulated Institutions

    Open Access•Michael A Zilis•International Journal of Public…•2020

  • Presidential Rhetoric and U.S. Supreme Court Rulings

    Open Access•Matthew Montgomery, Natalie Rogol et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Presidential Success in Supreme Court Appointments

    Open Access•Matthew P Hitt•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2013

  • Legislative-Judicial Relations

    Georg Vanberg•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Does the Leader's Ethnicity Matter? Ethnic Favoritism, Education, and Health in Sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Robert Franck, Raphaël Franck et al.•American Political Science Review•2012

  • Judging the “Vapid and Hollow Charade

    Open Access•Philip G Chen, Amanda Clare Bryan•Political Behavior•2017

  • Is the U.S. Supreme Court's Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Michael J Nelson•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Jeffery J Mondak, Shannon Ishiyama Smithey•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Political Justice

    Brandon L Bartels, Chris Johnston et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • The Political Party Basis of Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court

    Kenneth M Dolbeare, Phillip E Hammond•Public Opinion Quarterly•1968

  • Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? The Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Anke Grosskopf, Jeffery J Mondak•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Someone like Me

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Katelyn E Stauffer•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations

    Open Access•Malcolm Sen, Maya Sen•Political Research Quarterly•2017

  • Ideology and Specific Support for the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kathryn Haglin, Soren Jordan et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Buyer Beware? Presidential Success through Supreme Court Appointments

    Jeffrey A Segal, Richard J Timpone et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2000

  • Snap Judgment

    Open Access•Thomas G Hansford, Chanita Intawan et al.•Political Behavior•2018

  • A Competing Risks Model of Supreme Court Vacancies, 1789–1992

    Open Access•Christopher J W Zorn, Christopher Zorn et al.•Political Behavior•2000

  • Partisans in Robes

    Open Access•Stephen P Nicholson, Thomas G Hansford•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • The Theory of Presidential Association

    Gregory Casey, Gregory P Casey•American Journal of Political…•1975

  • On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Christian D Johnston et al.•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • Ideological Divergence and Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Robert H Durr, Robert Dürr et al.•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • The Supreme Court and the US Presidential Election of 2000

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•British Journal of Political…•2003

  • How Political Contestation Over Judicial Nominations Polarizes Americans’ Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Jon C Rogowski, Andrew Stones et al.•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Policy, Politics, and Public Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Stephen D Ansolabehere et al.•American Politics Research•2020

  • Source Cues and Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Tom S Clark, Jonathan P Kastellec•American Politics Research•2015

  • Does Public Support for Judicial Power Depend on Who is in Political Power? Testing a Theory of Partisan Alignment in Africa

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Eric Kramon•American Political Science Review•2020

Unique citing works17
Citations per year4,25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 17

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae