Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public

Bibliographic Data

ID6231196
AuthorsBrandon L Bartels (0000-0002-5144-4758, George Washington University), Christian D Johnston (0000-0001-6704-7629, Duke University), Christopher D Johnston
Year2013
Volume57
Issue1
Pages184-199
Publication date2013-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00616.x
OpenAlexW1868775365
LanguageEN
Citations received184
References cited28

Conventional wisdom says that individuals’ ideological preferences do not influence Supreme Court legitimacy orientations. Most work is based on the assumption that the contemporary Court is objectively conservative in its policymaking, meaning that ideological disagreement should come from liberals and agreement from conservatives. Our nuanced look at the Court's policymaking suggests rational bases for perceiving the Court's contemporary policymaking as conservative, moderate, and even liberal. We argue that subjective ideological disagreement—incongruence between one's ideological preferences and one's perception of the Court's ideological tenor—must be accounted for when explaining legitimacy. Analysis of a national survey shows that subjective ideological disagreement exhibits a potent, deleterious impact on legitimacy. Ideology exhibits sensible connections to legitimacy depending on how people perceive the Court's ideological tenor. Results from a survey experiment support our posited mechanism. Our work has implications for the public's view of the Court as a “political” institution

Epistemology · Ideology · Institution · Legitimacy · Majority opinion · Meaning (existential · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Sociology · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Philosophy

  • Curbing the Court

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Christian D Johnston et al.•Curbing the Court•2020

  • Partisan Approval for the Supreme Court After Dobbs

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Eric Kramon•Public Opinion Quarterly•2026

  • Measuring Judicial Appeasement of the United States Supreme Court

    Open Access•Donald Snyder, Caitlyn Pierce•American Politics Research•2026

  • Depictions of Partisan Bias at Oral Argument and Public Evaluations of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Joshua Boston, Christopher Krewson et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Do the Audio and Video from Public Hearings Impact High Court Legitimacy

    Open Access•Andrew Stones, Jeffrey Ziegler•Journal of Experimental Political…•2026

  • Are Algorithmic Decisions Legitimate? The Effect of Process and Outcomes on Perceptions of Legitimacy of AI Decisions

    Open Access•Kirsten Martins, Kirsten Martin et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2023

  • Does Legality Produce Political Legitimacy? An Experimental Approach

    Open Access•Yiqin Fu, Yiqing Xu et al.•The Journal of Legal Studies•2025

  • Rules for Thee, Not for Me

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, Elizabeth A Lane•Social Science Quarterly•2026

  • Can domestic courts erode confidence in international law? Evidence from Hungary

    Open Access•Sivaram Cheruvu, Jay N Krehbiel•European Journal of Political…•2026

  • Trust in the courts of Hong Kong

    Open Access•Shen Yang, Zhiyuan Ding•Journal of Asian and African…•2026

  • Lifetime Appointments, Lasting Reactions

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, Christopher Krewson et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • No Shelter in Unanimity

    Open Access•J Robison•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Democratic Institutions Under Threat

    Justin Wedeking, Michael A Zilis•Political Communication•2026

  • Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Logan Strother, Shana Kushner Gadarian•The Forum•2022

  • The Costs of Policy Legitimation

    Open Access•David Fontana, Christopher Krewson•Journal of Law and Courts•2022

  • Justice Speaks, but Who's Listening

    Open Access•Matthew P Hitt, Kyle L Saunders et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • The Effect of State Supreme Court Selection Method on Perceptions of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Thomas G Hansford, Eddie Lucero et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • Is the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Vulnerable to Intense Appointment Politics? Democrats’ Changed Views Around Justice Ginsburg’s Death

    Open Access•Douglas Glick, David M Glick•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • Accountability for Court Packing

    Open Access•Michael J Nelson, Amanda Driscoll•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • The Maintenance of Institutional Legitimacy in Supreme Court Justices’ Public Rhetoric

    Open Access•Colin Glennon, Logan Strother•Journal of Law and Courts•2019

  • The Political Determinants of Public Support for Obstruction of Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•Andrew Stones•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • A Matter of Opinion? How Unexpected Opinion Authors Influence Support for Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Jonathan M King, Jessica A Schoenherr•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Responsibility Attribution for Supreme Court Decision-Making

    Open Access•Robin Bayes, K Ramanathan et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2026

  • Measuring Subjective Ideological Disagreement with the US Supreme Court

    Open Access•Michael J Nelson, James L Gibson•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Does Descriptive Representation of Women on the Bench Improve Institutional Trust

    Open Access•Laura P Moyer•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • The Causes of the Legitimacy-Conferring and Republican Schoolmaster Capabilities of Courts

    Open Access•Benjamin Woodson•Journal of Law and Courts•2019

  • Can the Supreme Court Generate Public Acceptance of Election Rulings? Politicized Appointments, Elite Norm Violations, and the 2020 Election

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Eric Kramon•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Assessing Public Trust in Ghana’s Courts

    Open Access•Joseph Ofori Acheampong, Damon Cann•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Framing the Judiciary

    Open Access•Alisher Juzgenbayev•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Do Citizens in Backsliding Democracies Support International Courts’ Judicial Power? Evidence from Hungary

    Open Access•Sivaram Cheruvu, Jay N Krehbiel•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Going beyond Dobbs

    Christopher Krewson, Jean Reith Schroedel•Politics Groups and Identities•2024

  • The dimensions of judicial legitimacy

    Susan Achury, Jason P Casellas et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2025

  • Rethinking Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Amalina Yasmin Mohd Sokri•Asian Journal of Law and Society•2026

  • Unpresidented!” or

    Christopher D Kromphardt, Michael F Salamone•Journal of Information Technology…•2020

  • Domestic Attitudes Towards International Jurisdiction over Human Rights Violations

    Open Access•Alan J Simmons•Human Rights Review•2017

  • Leaking Trust

    Jessica F Sparks, Myiah J Hutchens•Journalism Practice•2025

  • It All Begins With a Name

    Rachel Grant, Benjamin K Johnson•Journalism Practice•2024

  • The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Michael J Nelson•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2014

  • Styles of Argumentation in Judicial Opinions (Legitimating Judicial Decisions)

    Open Access•Nicholas Scurich•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2018

  • In the Light

    Open Access•Taraleigh Davis•American Politics Research•2024

  • The Supreme Court and Congress

    Open Access•Maron W Sorenson•American Politics Research•2025

  • Fair Game or Foul Play

    Open Access•Audrey M Baricovich•American Politics Research•2024

  • Judging Judicial Review in the American States

    Open Access•Charles Crabtree, Michael J Nelson•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2019

  • Trust in the (Measures of Legitimacy of) Courts

    Open Access•Rahul Hemrajani•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • R-E-S-P-E-C-T

    Open Access•Alex Farone•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Supreme Court Legitimacy in a New Media Era

    Open Access•Justin Wedeking, Michael A Zilis•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • The Partisan Foundations of Attitudes Towards State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Eugenia Artabe, Alex Badas et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Democratizing U.S. Courts

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, John M Bruce•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Does Descriptive Representation Increase Acceptance of Judicial Decisions

    Open Access•Jay N Krehbiel•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Institutional Structures and Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Michael J Nelson, James L Gibson•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • The Political Court

    Joshua Boston, Christopher N Krewson et al.•Political Communication•2025

  • Cognitive Heuristics, Inter-Institutional Politics, and Public Perceptions of Insulated Institutions

    Open Access•Michael A Zilis•International Journal of Public…•2020

  • In Search of a “Happy Ending” in Legal Interpretation

    Open Access•Mikołaj Pietrzyk•International Journal for the…•2025

  • Does Procedural Fairness Impact Public Perception of Judicial Opinions? Evidence from a Survey Experiment

    Open Access•Rob Robinson, Danieli Evans•Law & Social Inquiry•2025

  • Are You Talking to Me? How Ideological and Gender Characteristics Moderate the Effect of Legitimizing Rhetoric on SCOTUS Legitimacy

    Open Access•Ryan J Williams, L Christiani•Law & Social Inquiry•2023

  • Home-State Interest, Nationalism, and the Legitimacy of the International Criminal Court

    Open Access•Nathan Carrington, Claire Sigsworth•Law & Social Inquiry•2021

  • An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Supreme Court Justices’ Public Rhetoric on Perceptions of Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Logan Strother, Colin Glennon•Law & Social Inquiry•2020

  • An Experimental Investigation of How Judicial Elections Affect Public Faith in the Judicial System

    Open Access•Anthony J Nownes, Colin Glennon•Law & Social Inquiry•2015

  • Public Support for Canadian Courts

    Open Access•Erin Crandall, Andrea Lawlor•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2022

  • The Specter of Supreme Court Criticism

    Open Access•D P Christenson, Douglas L Kriner•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Presidential Rhetoric and U.S. Supreme Court Rulings

    Open Access•Matthew Montgomery, Natalie Rogol et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Democratic values and support for executive power

    Open Access•Andrew Reeve, Andrew Reeves et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2023

  • Unilateral Action and Presidential Accountability

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Stephen D Ansolabehere et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Give Chance a Chance

    Open Access•Gerhard Sonnert•Alternatives Global Local Political•2020

  • With AI through the energy crisis? Citizens’ legitimacy perceptions of human and AI-supported hybrid decisions in an energy policy decision-making process

    Open Access•Marco Lünich, Jule Roth et al.•Technology in Society•2026

  • The Impact of Courts on Public Management

    Open Access•Andrew Osorio, Rosemary O’leary•Administration & Society•2017

  • An ecclesiastical court

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, Jonathan M King et al.•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • Negative Media Coverage of the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Alexander Denison, Justin Wedeking et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2020

  • Evaluating diffuse support for state high courts among individuals with varying levels of policy agreement

    Open Access•Damon Cann, Jeff Yates•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • How low can we go

    Open Access•Matthew Montgomery, Natalie Rogol•Social Science Quarterly•2023

  • One Bad Apple Spoils the Bunch

    Open Access•Nathan Carrington, Colin French•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • The Applied Legitimacy Index

    Open Access•Alex Badas•Social Science Quarterly•2019

  • Breaking the bank

    Open Access•Thora Giallouri, Elli Menounou•Social Science Quarterly•2024

  • Lawyers' Perceptions of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Christian D Johnston et al.•Law & Society Review•2015

  • Unpacking Legitimacy Perceptions of Investment Dispute Settlement

    Open Access•Marius Dotzauer•International Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Judicial Decisions, Backlash and Secessionism

    Open Access•Agustín Casas, Federico Curci et al.•The Economic Journal•2024

  • As Transmissões ao Vivo no Legislativo e no Judiciário

    Open Access•R C Barreto, Paulo Alkmin Costa Júnior•Dados•2023

  • The U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy

    Open Access•James L Gibson•The Annals of the American…•2024

  • Political Orientation and Trust in the Courts

    Man Yee Karen Lee, Yan Lam Lo•Asian Survey•2023

  • Critical coverage

    Open Access•Bryna Bogoch, Yifat Holzman‐Gazit•Law & Policy•2021

  • Building legitimacy

    Silje Synnøve Lyder Hermansen•Journal of European Public Policy•2020

  • The Impact of the Black Media on Diffuse Support for the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Mintao Nie, Eric N Waltenburg•Du Bois Review Social Science…•2017

  • Exploring Citizen Assessments of Unilateral Executive Authority

    Open Access•Eileen Braman•Law & Society Review•2016

  • Affective Polarization and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, A M Enders•Political Research Quarterly•2021

  • Judging the “Vapid and Hollow Charade

    Open Access•Philip G Chen, Amanda Clare Bryan•Political Behavior•2017

  • Naming Names

    Open Access•Scott S Boddery, Laura P Moyer et al.•Law & Society Review•2019

  • Is the U.S. Supreme Court's Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Michael J Nelson•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Party Time

    Open Access•Anna Mccaghren Fleming, Matthew Montgomery et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2025

  • Friendship is Rare

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, Jessica A Schoenherr•American Politics Research•2025

  • Reevaluating ideological asymmetries in specific support for the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kathryn Haglin, Soren Jordan et al.•Research & Politics•2025

  • High Courts, Endowments, and Support for Institutional Change

    Open Access•Eileen Braman, Udi Sommer et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Awareness of Executive Interference and the Demand for Judicial Independence

    Open Access•Martín Gandur, Taylor Kinsley Chewning et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Characters of Contention

    Open Access•Maron W Sorenson, Rachael Houston et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • You Better Shop Around

    Jamie S Scott, Jamil S Scott et al.•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • The Stability and Durability of the US Supreme Court’s Legitimacy

    Michael J Nelson, Patrick D Tucker et al.•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Because He Is Gay

    Ana Bracic, Mackenzie Israel-Trummel et al.•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • Partisan Conflict and Citizens’ Democratic Attitudes

    Nathan F Batto, Emily Beaulieu•The Journal of Politics•2020

  • The Costs of Court Curbing

    Amanda Driscoll, Michael J Nelson•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • The Two Opposing Effects of Judicial Elections on Legitimacy Perceptions

    Open Access•Benjamin Woodson•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2017

  • Public Perceptions of State Court Impartiality and Court Legitimacy in an Era of Partisan Politics

    Open Access•Corey Barwick, Corey Michael Barwick et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2020

  • Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations•2009

  • The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Harold J Spaeth•Supreme Court and the Attitudinal…•2002

  • The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity

    Open Access•James L Gibson•Journal of Empirical Legal Studies•2007

  • A systems analysis of political life

    David Easton•A systems analysis of political…•1979

  • The Reasoning Voter

    Samuel L Popkin•The Reasoning Voter•1991

  • Reasoning and Choice

    Open Access•Paul M Sniderman, Richard A Brody et al.•Reasoning and Choice•1991

  • Television News and the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Elliot E Slotnick, Jennifer A Segal•Television News and the Supreme…•1998

  • Confirmation Politics and The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•Law & Society Review•2011

  • Issue Preferences and Evaluations of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Marc J Hetherington, Joseph L Smith•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  • Measuring Policy Change in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Lawrence Baum•American Political Science Review•1988

  • Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Blacks and the United States Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Political Justice

    Brandon L Bartels, Chris Johnston et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Sensationalism and Sobriety Differential Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward American Courts

    Chris Johnston, C D Johnston et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  • Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? The Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Anke Grosskopf, Jeffery J Mondak•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Shattering the Myth of Legality

    Open Access•Vanessa A Baird, Amy Gangl•Political Psychology•2006

  • The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Gregory A Caldeira, James L Gibson•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Measuring Issue Salience

    Lee Epstein, Jeffrey A Segal•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • The Supreme Court and the US Presidential Election of 2000

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•British Journal of Political…•2003

  • The Supreme Court and Myth

    Open Access•Gregory Casey•Law & Society Review•1974

  • On the Legitimacy of National High Courts

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion

    Open Access•Valerie J Hoekstra•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia•American Political Science Review•1994

  • Attitude Attribution

    Open Access•Henry E Brady, Paul M Sniderman•American Political Science Review•1985

Unique citing works184
Citations per year14,15
Citation span2013 - 2026 (14)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 184

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae