Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court

Bibliographic Data

ID6232245
AuthorsGregory A Caldeira, James L Gibson (0000-0002-2571-6596)
Year1992
Volume36
Issue3
Pages635
Publication date1992-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2111585
OpenAlexW2608417329
LanguageEN
Citations received289
References cited17

The Supreme Court, like all political institutions, requires some minimal level of support because, as the high bench performs its political and constitutional roles, the justices must on occasion stand against the winds of public opinion. With data from a recent national survey, we reexamine the levels, sources, and explanations of public support for the Supreme Court. Since racial differences in attitudes toward the Court are so great, we focus here only on the attitudes of white U.S. citizens. Our purposes are both substantive and methodological. On the substantive front, we examine changes in the etiology of support. We investigate the traditional explanations of diffuse support, but, more important, we introduce and evaluate the power of a new set of variables, political values. These political values do an uncommonly good job of predicting attitudes toward the Court. In addition, we devote particular attention to the important role of as supporters of the Court. These leaders relate to the Court in a fashion very different from that of the mass public. On the methodological front, we offer an alternative means of thinking about and capturing diffuse support for the Court among the mass public. We close with speculations about the process by which diffuse support for the Court changes over time and, more generally, the implications of attitudes among the mass public and opinion leaders for the functioning of the Supreme Court

Concurring opinion · Court of record · Majority opinion · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Public opinion · Public relations · Public support · Supreme court · Supreme Court Decisions · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Legal and Constitutional Studies

  • After the Supreme Word

    Open Access•Michael A Unger•American Politics Research•2008

  • Law, Moral Attitudes, and Behavioral Change

    Kenworthey Bilz, Janice Nadler et al.•The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral…•2014

  • Curbing the Court

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Christian D Johnston et al.•Curbing the Court•2020

  • The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany

    Open Access•Georg Vanberg•Politics of Constitutional Review…•2004

  • Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Valerie J Hoekstra•Public Reaction to Supreme Court…•2003

  • The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity

    Open Access•James L Gibson•Journal of Empirical Legal Studies•2007

  • The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations

    Open Access•Jonas Tallberg, Michael Zürn•The Review of International…•2019

  • Partisan Approval for the Supreme Court After Dobbs

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Eric Kramon•Public Opinion Quarterly•2026

  • Depictions of Partisan Bias at Oral Argument and Public Evaluations of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Joshua Boston, Christopher Krewson et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • The legitimacy of international courts

    Open Access•Neus Torbisco‐Casals•Journal of Social Philosophy•2021

  • Migrant-Family Separation and Higher-Order Laws’ Diverging Normative Force

    Open Access•Kevin L Cope, Charles Crabtree•The Journal of Legal Studies•2022

  • Assessments of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal performance

    Open Access•Kamil Jonski, Wojciech Rogowski•Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i…•2023

  • Trust in the courts of Hong Kong

    Open Access•Shen Yang, Zhiyuan Ding•Journal of Asian and African…•2026

  • Limits on legitimacy

    Linda Skitka, Christopher W Bauman et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2009

  • Residents’ Support for Tourism

    Open Access•Robin Nunkoo, Kevin Kam Fung So•Travel Research Bulletin•2015

  • Lifetime Appointments, Lasting Reactions

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, Christopher Krewson et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Democratic Institutions Under Threat

    Justin Wedeking, Michael A Zilis•Political Communication•2026

  • Indiscrição judicial e erosão constitucional no Brasil

    Open Access•Rafael Dilly Patrus•Revista Direito e Práxis•2025

  • Beyond Invalidation

    Open Access•Vicente F Benítez-R•Revista de Investigações…•2022

  • Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Logan Strother, Shana Kushner Gadarian•The Forum•2022

  • Public Support for Judicial Philosophies

    Open Access•Christopher Krewson, Ryan J Owens•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Is the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Vulnerable to Intense Appointment Politics? Democrats’ Changed Views Around Justice Ginsburg’s Death

    Open Access•Douglas Glick, David M Glick•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • Accountability for Court Packing

    Open Access•Michael J Nelson, Amanda Driscoll•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • How the Supreme Court Alters Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review

    Open Access•Ryan J Owens, Justin Wedeking et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2013

  • The Maintenance of Institutional Legitimacy in Supreme Court Justices’ Public Rhetoric

    Open Access•Colin Glennon, Logan Strother•Journal of Law and Courts•2019

  • The Political Determinants of Public Support for Obstruction of Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•Andrew Stones•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • A Matter of Opinion? How Unexpected Opinion Authors Influence Support for Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Jonathan M King, Jessica A Schoenherr•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Judicial Selection and the Democratization of Justice

    Open Access•Amanda Driscoll, Michael J Nelson•Journal of Law and Courts•2015

  • Using Twitter to Study Public Discourse in the Wake of Judicial Decisions

    Open Access•Tom S Clark, Jeffrey K Staton et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Measuring Subjective Ideological Disagreement with the US Supreme Court

    Open Access•Michael J Nelson, James L Gibson•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • The Causes of the Legitimacy-Conferring and Republican Schoolmaster Capabilities of Courts

    Open Access•Benjamin Woodson•Journal of Law and Courts•2019

  • Case of the Mondays

    Open Access•Rachael Houston, Eve M Ringsmuth•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Assessing Public Trust in Ghana’s Courts

    Open Access•Joseph Ofori Acheampong, Damon Cann•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Framing the Judiciary

    Open Access•Alisher Juzgenbayev•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Ethnic identity and attitudes toward state institutions

    Erin Terese Huebert, Amy H Liu•Politics Groups and Identities•2016

  • Going beyond Dobbs

    Christopher Krewson, Jean Reith Schroedel•Politics Groups and Identities•2024

  • Native Americans' support for supreme court legitimacy

    Jay N Krehbiel•Politics Groups and Identities•2024

  • Deconstructing public confidence in state courts

    Joseph A Hamm, Lisa M Pytlikzillig et al.•Journal of Trust Research•2013

  • Are courts “different?” Experimental evidence on the unique costs of attacking courts

    Open Access•Amanda Driscoll, Michael J Nelson•Research & Politics•2023

  • Rethinking Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Amalina Yasmin Mohd Sokri•Asian Journal of Law and Society•2026

  • Compliance with Supreme Court Judgments in Politically Important Cases by Authoritarian and Hybrid Regimes

    Open Access•Nauman Reayat•Asian Journal of Law and Society•2025

  • Creating loyalty

    Open Access•Silvia Steininger•Global Constitutionalism•2022

  • May it please the twitterverse

    Todd A Curry, Michael P Fix•Journal of Information Technology…•2019

  • Unpresidented!” or

    Christopher D Kromphardt, Michael F Salamone•Journal of Information Technology…•2020

  • Domestic Attitudes Towards International Jurisdiction over Human Rights Violations

    Open Access•Alan J Simmons•Human Rights Review•2017

  • Are legal values gendered? Gender differences in support for judicial independence in Hong Kong

    Open Access•Man Yee Karen Lee, Yan Lam Lo•International journal of law,…•2020

  • Leaking Trust

    Jessica F Sparks, Myiah J Hutchens•Journalism Practice•2025

  • Looking for Law in All the Wrong Places? Foreign Law and Support for the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Brett Curry, Banks Miller•Politics & Policy•2008

  • Preserving Institutional Power

    Open Access•Bryan W Marshall, Brett Curry et al.•Politics & Policy•2014

  • New Style” Campaigning, Citizen Knowledge, and Sources of Legitimacy for State Courts

    Open Access•Mark Jonathan Mckenzie, Michael A Unger•Politics & Policy•2011

  • The Etiology of Public Support for the Designated Hitter Rule

    Christopher Zorn, Jeff Gill•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2007

  • The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Michael J Nelson•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2014

  • Styles of Argumentation in Judicial Opinions (Legitimating Judicial Decisions)

    Open Access•Nicholas Scurich•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2018

  • In the Light

    Open Access•Taraleigh Davis•American Politics Research•2024

  • The Supreme Court and Congress

    Open Access•Maron W Sorenson•American Politics Research•2025

  • Fair Game or Foul Play

    Open Access•Audrey M Baricovich•American Politics Research•2024

  • Judging Judicial Review in the American States

    Open Access•Charles Crabtree, Michael J Nelson•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2019

  • The impact of the Australian High Court on elite opinion

    William M Myers, Reginald S Sheehan•Commonwealth and Comparative…•2012

  • Courts as hegemonic institutions

    Gad Barzilai•Israel Affairs•1998

  • Russians and the legal system

    William M Reisinger, Arthur H Miller et al.•Journal of Communist Studies•1997

  • Understanding Variations in Media Coverage of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Donald P Haider-Markel, Mahalley D Allen et al.•Harvard International Journal of…•2006

  • Trust in the (Measures of Legitimacy of) Courts

    Open Access•Rahul Hemrajani•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Supreme Court Legitimacy in a New Media Era

    Open Access•Justin Wedeking, Michael A Zilis•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • The Partisan Foundations of Attitudes Towards State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Eugenia Artabe, Alex Badas et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Democratizing U.S. Courts

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, John M Bruce•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Race and Allegiance to the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gibson Gibson•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Does Descriptive Representation Increase Acceptance of Judicial Decisions

    Open Access•Jay N Krehbiel•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Fed Up

    Open Access•Ian G Anson•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Judicial Institutions, Independence, and the Separation of Powers

    Open Access•Teena Wilhelm, David A Hughes•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • The Political Court

    Joshua Boston, Christopher N Krewson et al.•Political Communication•2025

  • Before the Countermajoritarian Difficulty

    Open Access•Stephen M Engel•Studies in American Political…•2009

  • Does Procedural Fairness Impact Public Perception of Judicial Opinions? Evidence from a Survey Experiment

    Open Access•Rob Robinson, Danieli Evans•Law & Social Inquiry•2025

  • Approaching the Legitimacy Paradox in Hong Kong

    Open Access•Julius Yam•Law & Social Inquiry•2020

  • Rethinking Regime Politics

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • What’s in a Name

    Open Access•Ali S Masood, Benjamin J Kassow•Law & Social Inquiry•2022

  • Frame Spillover

    Open Access•Stephen M Engel•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • In Defense of Asbestos Tort Litigation

    Open Access•Jeb Barnes•Law & Social Inquiry•2009

  • In Defense of Asbestos Tort Litigation

    Open Access•Jeb Barnes•Law & Social Inquiry•2008

  • Compliance

    Open Access•Diana Kapiszewski, Matthew M Taylor•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • Public Support for Canadian Courts

    Open Access•Erin Crandall, Andrea Lawlor•Canadian Journal of Law and…•2022

  • Adhiere la ciudadanía a los principios del derecho penal y procesal penal? El caso del Gran Concepción, Chile

    Open Access•Pablo J Fuentealba-Carrasco, Beatriz E Larraín-Martínez et al.•Política criminal•2018

  • The dynamics of specific and diffuse support for the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Rick A Swanson•The Social Science Journal•2007

  • Public confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•James W Stoutenborough, Donald P Haider-Markel•The Social Science Journal•2008

  • The Contextual Determinants of Support for Unilateral Action

    Open Access•Andrew Reeve, Andrew Reeves et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2017

  • The Political Fallout of Taking a Stand

    Open Access•Donald P Haider-Markel, Donald P Haider‐markel et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2007

  • The Specter of Supreme Court Criticism

    Open Access•D P Christenson, Douglas L Kriner•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Public Opinion Toward Presidential Power

    Open Access•Andrew Reeve, Andrew Reeves et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Presidential Rhetoric and U.S. Supreme Court Rulings

    Open Access•Matthew Montgomery, Natalie Rogol et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Constitutional Review and the Selective Promotion of Case Results

    Open Access•Jeffrey K Staton•American Journal of Political…•2005

  • The 'Social', the 'Legal' and Law-and-Society Research

    Open Access•Amnon Reichman•International Sociology•2008

  • Political economy of tourism

    Open Access•Robin Nunkoo, Stephen L J Smith et al.•Tourism Management•2013

  • The social legitimacy of international organisations

    Open Access•Lisa Dellmuth, Lisa Maria Dellmuth et al.•Review of International Studies•2015

  • Why Trust Weighs More? Investigating the Endogenous Relationship Between Trust and Perceived Institutional Effectiveness

    Open Access•Hanyu Xiao, Ting Gong et al.•Administration & Society•2024

  • Confirmation Politics and The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • An ecclesiastical court

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, Jonathan M King et al.•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • Citizen assessment of local criminal courts

    Open Access•Kevin Buckler, Francis T Cullen et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2007

  • Mechanisms, measurements, and manifestations in evaluating the effects of confirmation hearings on Supreme Court legitimacy

    Open Access•Nathan Carrington, Nathan T Carrington et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2022

  • Negative Media Coverage of the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Alexander Denison, Justin Wedeking et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2020

  • Evaluating diffuse support for state high courts among individuals with varying levels of policy agreement

    Open Access•Damon Cann, Jeff Yates•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • The Applied Legitimacy Index

    Open Access•Alex Badas•Social Science Quarterly•2019

  • Political tolerance and American democracy

    John Lawrence Sullivan, JohnL Sullivan•Political tolerance and American…•1982

  • Representatives and Represented

    Paul Burstein, Samuel C Patterson et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1978

  • The Confidence Gap

    Open Access•Robert Y Shapiro•Political Science Quarterly•1984

  • Patterns of Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Joseph Tanenhaus, Walter F Murphy•The Journal of Politics•1981

  • Blacks and the United States Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • The Political Party Basis of Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court

    Kenneth M Dolbeare, Phillip E Hammond•Public Opinion Quarterly•1968

  • Perceived legitimacy of Supreme Court decisions

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak•Political Behavior•1990

  • The Breadth, Depth, and Utility of Class, Partisan, and Ideological Schemata

    Ruth Hamill, Milton Lodge et al.•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • The Impact of Judicial Activism on Public Opinion

    Richard Lehne, John Reynolds•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • Support for the Supreme Court as a National Policymaker

    Open Access•David Adamany, Joel B Grossman•Law & Policy•1983

  • Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion

    Stanley Feldman•American Journal of Political…•1988

  • The Supreme Court and Myth

    Open Access•Gregory Casey•Law & Society Review•1974

  • The Renaissance of Political Culture

    Open Access•Ronald Inglehart•American Political Science Review•1988

  • Political Issues and Trust in Government

    Open Access•Arthur H Miller•American Political Science Review•1974

  • Positive Support for Political Institutions

    Roger H Davidson, Roger Davidson et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1972

Unique citing works289
Citations per year8,5
Citation span1992 - 2026 (35)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 288

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae