Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Applied Legitimacy Index

A New Approach to Measuring Judicial Legitimacy

Bibliographic Data

ID10763571
AuthorsAlex Badas (0000-0002-6379-0375, University of Houston, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume100
Issue5
Pages1848-1861
Publication date2019-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-4941 • E-ISSN: 1540-6237
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ssqu.12660
OpenAlexW2942538578
LanguageEN
Citations received29
References cited24

Objectives This article advances criticisms of the traditional legitimacy index as it relates to determining whether ideological distance predicts an individual's willing to sanction the Court. As a solution to these criticisms, this article develops a new measure of judicial legitimacy, the applied legitimacy index. Methods Using data from the American Panel Survey and item response theory models, this article estimates the applied legitimacy index. Ordinary least squares regression models then compare the effect ideological distance has on both the traditional legitimacy index and the newly developed applied legitimacy index. Results The results indicate that those who are ideologically distant from the Court have diminished views of the Court's applied legitimacy. The substantive effect of ideological distance is much larger for applied legitimacy than when compared with traditional legitimacy. Conclusions This article suggests that the traditional legitimacy index may overestimate loyalty to the Court and underestimate the extent to which individuals are willing to sanction an ideologically distant Court. Based on this, the article advocates that scholars adopt the applied legitimacy index in future studies

Econometrics · Economics · Ideology · Index (typography) · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Loyalty · Ordinary least squares · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations

  • Partisan Approval for the Supreme Court After Dobbs

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Eric Kramon•Public Opinion Quarterly•2026

  • High Courts, Endowments, and Support for Institutional Change

    Open Access•Eileen Braman, Udi Sommer et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Measuring the Countermajoritarian Nature of Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Eugenia Artabe, Alex Badas•The Journal of Legal Studies•2023

  • Judging Bias

    Open Access•Matthew C Dempsey, Matthew Dempsey et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2026

  • Assessments of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal performance

    Open Access•Kamil Jonski, Wojciech Rogowski•Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i…•2023

  • Can the Supreme Court Generate Public Acceptance of Election Rulings? Politicized Appointments, Elite Norm Violations, and the 2020 Election

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Eric Kramon•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Is the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Vulnerable to Intense Appointment Politics? Democrats’ Changed Views Around Justice Ginsburg’s Death

    Open Access•Douglas Glick, David M Glick•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • Diffuse Support, Partisanship, and the Electoral Relevance of the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Nicholas T Davis, Matthew P Hitt•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Going beyond Dobbs

    Christopher Krewson, Jean Reith Schroedel•Politics Groups and Identities•2024

  • Rethinking Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Amalina Yasmin Mohd Sokri•Asian Journal of Law and Society•2026

  • Democratizing U.S. Courts

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, John M Bruce•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Democratic Institutions Under Threat

    Justin Wedeking, Michael A Zilis•Political Communication•2026

  • Mechanisms, measurements, and manifestations in evaluating the effects of confirmation hearings on Supreme Court legitimacy

    Open Access•Nathan Carrington, Nathan T Carrington et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2022

  • One Bad Apple Spoils the Bunch

    Open Access•Nathan Carrington, Colin French•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • Breaking the bank

    Open Access•Thora Giallouri, Elli Menounou•Social Science Quarterly•2024

  • The Public Consequences of Presidential Legitimacy Rhetoric

    Open Access•Stephanie Wise•Social Science Quarterly•2025

  • Friendship is Rare

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, Jessica A Schoenherr•American Politics Research•2025

  • The Supreme Court as an electoral issue

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Elizabeth N Simas et al.•Political Science Research and…•2022

  • Social Imagery and Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Eric R Schmidt•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Public Approval of the Supreme Court and Its Implications for Legitimacy

    Open Access•Joshua Boston, Christopher Krewson•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Social Imagery and Subjective Ideological Proximity to the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Eric R Schmidt•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Motivated Reasoning and Attitudes Towards Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

    Open Access•Alex Badas•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Millionaire Justices and Attitudes Towards the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Billy Justus•Political Behavior•2024

  • Televised Oral Arguments and Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Ryan C Black, Timothy R Johnson et al.•Political Behavior•2024

  • The Racialization of the United States Supreme Court? Examining Changes in Public Opinion Toward SCOTUS Over Time

    Open Access•K Shoub, Jamie S Scott et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • Partisan sorting, fatalism, and Supreme Court legitimacy

    Open Access•Nicholas T Davis, Matthew P Hitt•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • The Gender Gap in Supreme Court Legitimacy

    Open Access•Christopher Krewson, Jean Reith Schroedel•American Politics Research•2023

  • Politicized Battles

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, Elizabeth A Lane•American Politics Research•2023

  • Medindo o apoio público ao Supremo Tribunal Federal

    Open Access•Fabiana L De Oliveira, Luciana G Cunha et al.•Opinião Pública•2024

  • Dimensions of Tolerance

    Alida Brill, Herbert Mcclosky•Dimensions of Tolerance•1983

  • What Americans know about politics and why it matters

    Michael X Delli Carpini•What Americans know about…•1996

  • The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice

    Open Access•A Lind, E Allan Lind et al.•Social Psychology of Procedural…•1988

  • Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations•2009

  • A systems analysis of political life

    David Easton•A systems analysis of political…•1979

  • Ideology in America

    Open Access•Christopher Ellis, James A Stimson•Ideology in America•2012

  • Is the U.S. Supreme Court's Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Michael J Nelson•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • New-Style” Judicial Campaigns and the Legitimacy of State High Courts

    James L Gibson•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Issue-Specific Opinion Change

    D P Christenson, David M Glick•Public Opinion Quarterly•2015

  • Change in Institutional Support for the US Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Michael J Nelson•Public Opinion Quarterly•2016

  • Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • Reassessing the Supreme Court

    Open Access•D P Christenson, David M Glick•Political Research Quarterly•2019

  • Silent Voices

    Open Access•David Niven•Perspectives on Politics•2005

  • The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Gregory A Caldeira, James L Gibson•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Chief Justice Roberts's Health Care Decision Disrobed

    Open Access•D P Christenson, David M Glick•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public

    Open Access•Brandon L Bartels, Christian D Johnston et al.•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Losing, but Accepting

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Milton Lodge et al.•Law & Society Review•2014

  • The Two Faces of Issue Voting

    Open Access•E G Carmines, James A Stimson•American Political Science Review•1980

  • On the Legitimacy of National High Courts

    Open Access•James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Some Social Requisites of Democracy

    Open Access•Seymour Martin Lipset•American Political Science Review•1959

  • Middle Alternatives Revisited

    Open Access•Patrick Sturgis, Caroline Roberts et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2014

Unique citing works29
Citations per year5,8
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 29

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae