Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Broken signs

The architectonic translation of Peirce's fragments

Bibliographic Data

ID3151381
AuthorsDinda L Gorlée (corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume2007
Issue163
Publication date2007-01-20
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSemiotica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0037-1998 • E-ISSN: 1613-3692
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/sem.2007.012
OpenAlexW2002376296
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited8

Peirce's writings are understood and translated in their interweaved fragments without final form. The broken and unbroken fragmentary items of language correspond to degrees of tone, token, and type as Peirce's building blocks of his three superlative categories. The collective and private meanings of Firsts, Seconds, and Thirds are embodied in vague bricolages and grounding paraphrases toward the (maybe idealized) whole manuscript version. Semio-translation, the process of reading and translating from one language into another, speaks about metaphrase, periphrase, and superphrase in order to construct the proposed verbal meaning, corresponding to the judgmental semiosis of Peirce's writings. The text of his entire manuscripts (in edited and unedited versions) give the readers (including translators as privileged readers) the opportunity of various degrees of justification and doubt of possible meanings, casted on what is the fragmentariness, elementariness, and holism of his oeuvre. Using the available translations of Peirce's English writings into German, French, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, Norwegian, and other languages, translation criticism perceives different upward and downward habits at work, creating acceptable and unacceptable solutions in the target language of philosophical and narrative genres. As practical examples of the degrees of formal and dynamical translations, interlingual and intralingual translations of Peirce's terms and sentences such as ‘lithium,’ ‘university,’ ‘apple pie,’ ‘musement,’ ‘decapitated frog,’ and the versions of the ‘pragmatic maxims’ — all of them fallibly (and sometimes fallaciously) translated into single and replicated fragments of scripture composed by various translators into various languages are discussed

Art · Epistemology · Formality · German · Linguistics · Literature · Meaning (existential) · Narrative · Reading (process) · Semiosis · Semiotics · Philosophy · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education

  • Translation of semiotics into translation theory, and vice versa

    Susan Petrilli•Punctum International Journal of…•2015

  • A sketch of Peirce’s Firstness and its significance to art

    Open Access•Dinda L Gorlée•Sign Systems Studies•2009

  • Goethe's glosses to translation

    Open Access•Dinda L Gorlée•Sign Systems Studies•2012

  • Wittgenstein as Mastersinger

    Open Access•Dinda L Gorlée•Semiotica•2008

  • Semiosic Translation

    Open Access•Sergio Torres-Martínez•Language and Semiotic Studies•2024

  • The black box of translation

    Open Access•Dinda L Gorlée•Semiotica•2010

  • Hints and guesses

    Open Access•Dinda L Gorlée•Sign Systems Studies•2005

  • Text semiotics

    Open Access•Dina L Gorlée•Sign Systems Studies•2000

  • Bridging the gap ‐ a Semiotician's view on translating the Greek classics

    Dinda L Gorlée•Perspectives•1997

  • The universality and fecundity of Peirce's categories

    Open Access•Lúcia Santaella, Lucia Santaella-Braga•Semiotica•2005

  • Degeneracy

    Open Access•Dinda L Gorlée•Semiotica•1990

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2008 - 2024 (17)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae