The Impact of Universal Suffrage

A Comparison of Popular and Property Voting

Bibliographic Data

ID3217304
AuthorsKenneth N Vines (Temple College), Henry Robert Glick
Year1967
Volume61
Issue4
Pages1078-1087
Publication date1967-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1953408
OpenAlexW2333433130
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited8

The attainment of universal suffrage over various forms of voting restrictions has been one of the major accomplishments in the development of modern democratic institutions. Struggles for the vote have had to overcome restrictions based on factors such as sex, race and tenure of property. While gaps in the exercise of the franchise still remain, formal restrictions on voting in the United States have been largely removed.However, an important question, largely uninvestigated, concerns the "costs" of the universal franchise in terms of the quality of government and its impact upon policy decisions. Do the disadvantages of universal suffrage offset advantages said to be gained, particularly in Western nations, such as increased legitimization of decisions and stability of regimes? Many of the past and present opponents of the extension of voting have argued that the poor results to be expected from the impact of universal suffrage far outweigh the advantages. Clearly, the problem of "costs" is important, for it is a crucial element in the argument over democracy and the vote

Argument (complex analysis · Business · Democracy · Economics · Franchise · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Suffrage · Universal suffrage · Voting · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Marketing

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub