Exploring the generational ordering of kinship through decisions about DNA testing and gamete donor conception
What's the right age to know your donor relatives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3280381 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lisa Gilman (0000-0002-4697-6485, University of Sheffield), P Nordqvist (0000-0001-8340-9976, University of Manchester), N Hudson (0000-0003-4091-1493, De Montfort University), Libby Frith (0000-0002-8506-0699, University of Manchester, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 526-545 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Sociological Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-0261 • E-ISSN: 1467-954X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00380261241309488 |
| OpenAlex | W4406538234 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 40 |
The development of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT), in conjunction with social media, has had profound consequences for the management of information about donor conception. One outcome is that it is now possible to circumvent formal age-restrictions on accessing information about people related through donor conception. Consequently, many donor conceived people and their parents face questions regarding what is the 'right age' to seek out such connections with 'donor relatives'. In this article, we share findings from 20 interviews with UK-based parents through donor conception, exploring how they grapple with such questions and possibilities. This involves parents reflecting on the meaning of childhood and its significance in processes of kinship. We identify three ontologies of childhood in participants' reasoning: children as kinship catalysts, children as vulnerable to kinship risk and children as emerging kinship agents. We discuss what our findings tell us about the generational ordering of kinship. We show that processes through which genetic relatedness is made to matter (or not) are understood to operate differently according to the generational position of those involved due to culturally-specific understandings of childhood. These ontologies of childhood, and their relationship to kinship, are (re)produced in and through parent-child relationships
Biology · Gamete · Genealogy · Kinship · Political science · Right to know · Sociology · Anthropology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Genetics · History · Law · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Social Psychology
Embodied Progress
Reconceptualising Agency and Childhood
Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood
The Palgrave Handbook of Childhood Studies
Sex Cells
Infertility around the globe
Born and Bred
Establishing Identity
Risk, health and parenting culture
Siblings and sociology
Understanding Children’s Personal Lives and Relationships
The Sociology of Children, Childhood and Generation
The Kinning of Foreigners
European Kinship in the Age of Biotechnology
Adult-child relations in neoliberal times
Organizing Openness
Children’s agency and migration
Mediated Kinship
Reconceptualising Children's Agency as Continuum and Interdependence
Children's agency and its contradictions in the context of transnational labour migration from Vietnam
Affinities, seeing and feeling like family
Genetic thinking and everyday living
Being Related
Childhood Studies
Interrogating innocence
Productive Paradoxes of the Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the Context of the New Kinship Studies
Parenting
Tangible Affinities and the Real Life Fascination of Kinship
A Nine-Month Head-Start
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |