Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Case for Responsible Parties

Bibliographic Data

ID3300508
AuthorsDan Bernhardt (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign), Jim Duggan (0000-0001-8554-2594, University of Rochester), John Duggan, Francesco Squintani (0000-0001-5632-5267, University of Essex)
Year2009
Volume103
Issue4
Pages570-587
Publication date2009-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0003055409990232
OpenAlexW2135114312
LanguageEN
Citations received20
References cited41

Electoral platform convergence is perceived unfavorably by both the popular press and many academic scholars. Arguably, to paraphrase, "it does not provide enough choice" between candidates. This article provides a formal account of the perceived negative effects of platform convergence. We show that when parties do not know voters' preferences precisely, all voters ex ante prefer some platform divergence to convergence at the ex ante median. After characterizing the unique symmetric equilibrium of competition between responsible (policy-motivated) parties, we conclude that all voters ex ante prefer responsible parties to opportunistic (purely office-motivated) ones when parties are sufficiently ideologically polarized that platforms diverge, but not so polarized that they diverge excessively. However, greater polarization increases the scope for office benefits as an instrument for institutional design. We calculate the socially optimal level of platform divergence and show that office benefits can be used to achieve this first-best outcome, if parties are sufficiently ideologically polarized

Competition (biology · Convergence (economics · Divergence (linguistics · Economics · Ex-ante · Ideology · Law and economics · Microeconomics · Outcome (game theory · Paraphrase · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Politics · Scope (computer science · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • A theory on party discipline and vote switching by legislators

    Open Access•Paula González, Francesca Passarelli et al.•European Journal of Political…•2021

  • How does political uncertainty affect the optimal degree of policy divergence

    Open Access•R Emre Aytimur, Aris Boukouras et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2025

  • Does Polarisation of Opinions Lead to Polarisation of Platforms? The Case of Correlation Neglect

    Gilat Levy, Ronny Razin•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2015

  • Dynamic Elections and Ideological Polarization

    Open Access•Salvatore Nunnari, Jan Zápal•Political Analysis•2017

  • Implementing direct democracy via representation

    Open Access•Guadalupe Correa-Lopera•Mathematical Social Sciences•2024

  • Do direct-democratic procedures lead to higher acceptance than political representation

    Open Access•Emanuel V Towfigh, Sebastian J Goerg et al.•Public Choice•2016

  • Silent promotion of agendas

    Open Access•Hideo Konishi, Chen-Yu Pan•Public Choice•2020

  • Negative Voters? Electoral Competition with Loss-Aversion

    Open Access•Ben Lockwood, James Rockey•The Economic Journal•2020

  • Electoral Accountability and Responsive Democracy

    Open Access•Jim Duggan, John Duggan et al.•The Economic Journal•2019

  • Adopting restriction

    Open Access•Fabio Ellger, Heinrich Kluver•West European Politics•2025

  • With Friends like These, Who Needs Enemies

    Francesco Izzo, Federica Izzo•The Journal of Politics•2024

  • Political Conflict over Time

    Open Access•William Howells, William G Howell et al.•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • Electoral Ambiguity and Political Representation

    Open Access•Navin Kartik, Richard Van Weelden et al.•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Political space representations with approval data

    Open Access•Carlos Alós-Ferrer, Georg D Granic et al.•Electoral Studies•2015

  • Leaders, voters and activists in the elections in Great Britain 2005 and 2010

    Open Access•Norman Schofield, Maria Gallego et al.•Electoral Studies•2011

  • Tactical Extremism

    Open Access•Jon X Eguia, Francesco Giovannoni•American Political Science Review•2019

  • Partisan Leaning

    Open Access•Zuheir Desai, Anderson Frey et al.•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Political Competition in Legislative Elections

    Open Access•Stefan Krasa, Mattias Polborn et al.•American Political Science Review•2018

  • Searching for Good Policies

    Open Access•Steven Callander•American Political Science Review•2011

  • Competition between Specialized Candidates

    Open Access•Stefan Krasa, Mattias Polborn•American Political Science Review•2010

  • Ideology and discontent

    David Ernest Apter•Ideology and discontent•1967

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • The Responsible Electorate

    V O Key, Arthur Maass et al.•Responsible Electorate•1966

  • A Unified Theory of Voting

    Open Access•Samuel Merrill, III Samuel Merrill et al.•Unified Theory of Voting•1999

  • Mapping Policy Preferences ii

    Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Hans‐dieter Klingemann et al.•Mapping policy preferences II•2006

  • The Rational Public

    Benjamin I Page, Robert Y Shapiro•The Rational Public•1992

  • A Unified Theory of Party Competition

    Open Access•James Adams, James F Adams et al.•Unified Theory of Party Competition•2005

  • Mapping Policy Preferences

    Ian Budge, Hans-Dieter Klingemann et al.•Mapping policy preferences•2001

  • An Economic Model of Representative Democracy

    Tim Besley, Stephen Coate•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1997

  • A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates

    Martin J Osborne, Alan Slivinski•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1996

  • Spatial Equilibrium with Entry

    Thomas R Palfrey•The Review of Economic Studies•1984

  • A Political Economy Model of Congressional Careers

    Daniel Diermeier, Michael P Keane et al.•American Economic Review•2005

  • Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate

    Open Access•Enriqueta Aragones, Thomas R Palfrey•Journal of Economic Theory•2002

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • Problems and Techniques

    Elmo Roper, Edward G Benson et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1940

  • The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics

    Philip E Converse•Politisk Psykologi•2010

  • The Theory of Committees and Elections

    Open Access•Duncan Black, Georg Kunze•Theory of Committees and Elections•1986

  • Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System

    Samuel J Eldersveld•The Western Political Quarterly•1951

  • Stability in Competition

    Harold Hotelling•The Economic Journal•1929

  • Context Effects on Survey Responses to Questions About Abortion

    Howard Schuman, Stanley Presser et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1981

  • Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response

    Open Access•Christopher H Achen•American Political Science Review•1975

  • A Simple Theory of the Survey Response

    John Zaller, Stanley Feldman•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Experiments in Wording Questions

    Donald Rugg, Donald E Rugg•Public Opinion Quarterly•1941

  • Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes

    Philip E Converse•Public Opinion Quarterly•1962

  • Uninformed Votes

    Larry M Bartels•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model

    Randall L Calvert•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage

    Tim Groseclose•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Considered Opinions

    Open Access•Robert C Luskin, James S Fishkin et al.•British Journal of Political…•2002

  • The Strength of Issues

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Judith Rodden et al.•American Political Science Review•2008

  • Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Martin Gilens•American Political Science Review•2001

  • Spatial Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election

    Open Access•Steve Jessee, Stephen A Jessee•American Political Science Review•2009

  • Candidate Motivation

    Open Access•Donald Wittman•American Political Science Review•1983

  • Information Effects in Collective Preferences

    Open Access•Scott L Althau, Scott L Althaus•American Political Science Review•1998

Unique citing works20
Citations per year1,25
Citation span2010 - 2025 (16)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 20

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae